Rigid uniform Rod is pulled slightly ( Gently ) at the bottom at time t = 0 . Then Find the angle θ from Horizontal as shown at which Rod will Loose it's contact with Vertical Smooth wall . If your answer can be expressed as : tan θ = c a b . Then Find a + b + c
Details and assumptions
∙ All surfaces are perfectly smooth.
∙ g c d ( a , c ) = 1
∙ b is square free integer and a , b , c all are integers.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Nice solution. I think using concept of IAOR gives the answer quite quickly.
Log in to reply
Yes it Saves much Time , But Your approach is also Nice !
Log in to reply
Thanks! :)
here d w(omega)/d(theta ) is negative , I think the equation (2) is wrong
Best solution.
Isn't the ICR changing as the rod's position changes ? Shouldn't there be a pseudo force due to its acceleration ?
This is what I did, but I have a doubt - Don't we need to consider the work done by the normal forces while writing the conservation-of-energy equation?
Log in to reply
No , it will be zero Because By using work-energy equation: System(Rod + Earth): Reference ( ICR) Since ICR is momentarily at rest So we Don't Consider any Pseudo Force at COM of Rod
w e x t = ∑ E f , M e c h a n i c a l − ∑ E i , M e c h a n i c a l w e x t = ∫ τ I C R d θ τ I C R = τ N 1 + τ N 2 τ N 1 = τ N 2 = 0 .
Since They Pass Through The Point of Rotation (ICR)
Log in to reply
One can qualititatively say that normal reactions dont do work as the displacement of the bodies part immediately in contact is at 90 degree, to force, but your method is a good way to state that,, though its the same,, its good to see that you arrive at the same result through both ways :)
Nice :) I don't know why I didn't think of torque as ∫ τ d θ . My bad.
The Work done by N1 is +ve
The work done by N2 is negative so they cancel out.
This is true because,
If you use the Torque equation about ICoR,
1/2(MgLcos(theta))=I*(alpha).
You get the same equation for alpha.
Log in to reply
No ! In which Fame You are talking ? If You are Talking in ICR frame Then work done by Normal forces are individualy zero . You are saying wrong that work done by N1 is +ve and N2 is -ve , Infact work done by N1 = 0 and N2=0 in ICR frame ! So think once again !
Log in to reply
@Deepanshu Gupta – Im talking from the point where the two walls meet.(call it X)
the center of mass of the rod moves away from X due to force N1 as displacement and force direction is the same work done is +ve But in Y direction the center of mass of rod is coming down towards the floor but N2 is in opposite direction so work done is -ve.
If work done by N1 is zero why would the center of mass be displaced at all? (The only force acting the x direction is N1)
Log in to reply
@A Former Brilliant Member – No Dear , Did You Know what is Basic Definition of Work done ?
It States That Work done By any Force equals to : W f = f . d x cos θ .
where
θ = angle between displacement(of Point of application) vector and force
d x = displacment of Point of application force
So While Calculating work done For Extended Bodies (Like Here it is Rod) You can't apply Force Centre of mass ! You have to seen displacement of point of application of Force not the Centre of mass of body !
And You Say that why Centre of mass is shifting forward Then it is Because of Normal Force it will move forward but it doesn't mean That work is also done by Normal force
So here N 1 = 0 & N 2 = 0 . But
W N 1 = W N 2 = 0 .
Because Displacement Vector of point of application of force and Force are orthogonal ( at right angle) So cos θ = 0 .
So Be careful That : i f W = 0 ⇏ f = 0 .
For Better Understanding Explain why work done By friction on Rolling Sphere is Zero ?
here d w(omega)/d(theta ) is negative
it's no good , i got the aNSWER 2/ROOT5 I THOUGHT THE ANSWER WAS NOT IN THE FORM I GOT SO, I DISCUSSED SOLUTION :'(
Log in to reply
So you should learn a lesson.In an exam consider each aspect of the question.If you solved this in an exam and didn't mark the answer you will be kicking yourself for what you did.Best of luck and sorry if I was a bit harsh.
Log in to reply
why pseudo acceleration for IAOR not taken into account? while calculating the horizontal component of acceleration of com why was the acceleration of IAOR not added????
JEE just a few days far 😨
Log in to reply
@Sumanth R Hegde – Best of luck.......You are in which coaching.?
Log in to reply
@Spandan Senapati – I'm in BASE coaching institute in Karnataka.
@Sumanth R Hegde – ya i don't think i can pass :(
@Sumanth R Hegde – Hey can you give some hints on calculating the definite integral of a r c t a n s i n x .With the limits from 0 − π / 2
Log in to reply
@Spandan Senapati – nobody talk to a loser , huh ?
Log in to reply
@A Former Brilliant Member – Ur not a loser! Getting low marks in an exam is no where close to being a reflection of ur intelligence!
thnx.........
shouldn't there be any pseudo force as iaor is changing with time?
This is second time I am posting this figure. :D
img
From the figure
V B C = 2 l ω
V B C = 2 l ω s i n θ i ^ + 2 l ω c o s θ j ^
and V A C = − 2 l ω s i n θ i ^ − 2 l ω c o s θ j ^
As V B C = V B − V C and V A C = V A − V C
or V C = V B − V B C
So V C j ^ = − 2 l ω c o s θ j ^ (considering velocity in vertical direction only. We are doing this because V B j ^ = 0 )
Similarly we can get
V C i ^ = 2 l ω s i n θ i ^ ............(4)
So V C = 2 l ω s i n θ i ^ − 2 l ω c o s θ j ^
Also from conservation of energy
m g 2 l ( 1 − s i n θ ) = 2 1 ( m v 2 + I C ω 2 ) ......................(1)
Also V C = ( 2 l ω ) 2 (we can get this from eq(4))
Putting this in eq-1 we get
ω 2 = l 3 g ( 1 − s i n θ ) ............(2)
When the rod looses contact with the vertical rod the Normal force acting on Rod becomes 0. So no horizontal force act on the rod after the moment the rod left contact with vertical wall. So acceleration of the CoM of the rod in horizontal direction is 0.
So d t d ( V C i ^ ) = d t d ( 2 l ω s i n θ i ^ ) = 0
So d θ d ( l 3 g ( 1 − s i n θ ) s i n θ ) d t d θ = 0
or d θ d ( ( 1 − s i n θ ) s i n θ ) = 0
or c o s θ ( 1 − s i n θ ) = 2 ( 1 − s i n θ ) s i n θ c o s θ
So s i n θ = 3 2
or t a n θ = 5 2 5 . :)
I almost did the same
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
we can solve this question by IAOR ( Instantaneous Centre of rotation )
Using energy conservation in ICR frame : ( Since Rod is in pure Rotational motion about ICR )
2 m g L ( 1 − sin φ ) = 2 1 I I C R ω 2 2 m g L ( 1 − sin φ ) = 2 1 ( 1 2 m L 2 + 4 m L 2 ) ω 2 ω 2 = L 3 g ( 1 − sin φ ) . . . ( 1 ) .
α = ω d φ d ω = − 2 L 3 g ( cos φ ) . . . . ( 2 ) a C = ω 2 2 L = 2 3 g ( 1 − sin φ ) . . . . ( 3 ) a T = 2 L α = − 4 3 g ( cos φ ) . . . . . ( 4 ) .
Rod will Loose it's Contact with the wall if N 1 = 0 ⇒ a c o m , n e t , H o r i z o n t a l = 0 .
Resolve net acceleration in vertical and horizontal direction and equating horizontal component to zero , so we should get ,
sin θ = 3 2 , ⇒ tan θ = 5 2 5 . Q.E.D