x satisfying
Find the total number of values of( 3 + 1 ) 2 x + ( 3 − 1 ) 2 x = 2 3 x
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Also, x cannot be greater than 2 because of Fermat's last theorem...
Log in to reply
Yeah but that theorem is applicable pnly when all terms are integers, while here radicals are involved
your solution is very nice
the solution is 1 nad x=1
i just used my hand Calculator to solved it.. :)
2 3 x ( 3 + 1 ) 2 x and 2 3 x ( 3 − 1 ) 2 x as functions of x are 2 strictly monotonically decreasing functions whose sum is again a striclty monotonically decreasing function which evaluates to 2 at x = 0 and 0 as x tends to infinity. Thus it must pass through 1 exactly 1 times. So the number of solutions is also equal to 1
Woah! Great.
taking log both sides, it will be very easy to see that only x=0 satisfies that log eq. Hence no. of solution is 1.
Uh dude x = 0 doesn't satisfy. :P
Log in to reply
2 x l n ( 3 + 1 ) + 2 x l n ( 3 − 1 ) = 3 x l n 2 2 x l n [ ( 3 + 1 ) ( 3 − 1 ) ] = 3 x l n 2 2 x l n 2 = 3 x l n 2 S o l : x = 0
Log in to reply
hey i think u can't take log like this. ln(a+b) is not equal to ln(a)+ln(b). What u did is that ln(a+b)=lna+lnb=ln(ab)...
Log in to reply
@Akanksha Gupta – Hmm... You sometimes make huge silly blunders...thanks
@Akanksha Gupta – Yes that's exactly correct! Thank you! Otherwise
lo g ( 2 0 ) = lo g ( 1 0 + 1 0 ) = lo g ( 1 0 ) + lo g ( 1 0 ) = 1 + 1 = 2
which is clearly not true.
Are you trying to tell me that 1 + 1 = 1 ?
Log in to reply
@Finn Hulse – I am trying to tell you, 0 = 0 . I am talking about sol. of log equation not the original. But since x is in the powers no.of sol. of original as well log must be the same here in this problem.
Log in to reply
@Haresh Raval – Oh. But dude the solution to this problem is just 1 . I hope you realize that n 0 = 1 for all real n .
Log in to reply
@Finn Hulse – but not for 0, as 0 raised to power 0 is not defined.
hey you can use this formula lna+lnb=lnab
Dear log can't be taken like this you made mistake in taking log on left side
Its js d guessing thing,see 2x is the index,fr instance remove 'x' & solve.so The final ans comes 8 & 2^3=8,remove x! So both sides come same! Means x=1!
by Fermat's theorem,value of x ranges only from 0 to 1 it cannot be greater than 2, it follows x cannot also be zero, only 1 could be the value of x that only statisfies the given equation.
( 3 + 1 ) 2 x + ( 3 − 1 ) 2 x = 2 3 x
⇒ ( 2 2 3 + 1 ) 2 x + ( 2 2 3 − 1 ) 2 x = 1
⇒ ( sin 7 5 ) 2 x + ( cos 7 5 ) 2 x = 1 ⇒ x m u s t b e e q u a l t o 1
So, the total number of solutions =1
simply u can check by putting, x=0,1,2......only x=1 satisfies th equ., so no. of values is 1.
x cannot be greater than 2 to contradict fermat's last theorem .....and x=2 do not satisfy the equation
Sir what is Fermat's theorem? And could you plz tell me some other theorems regarding this type of problems.
Oh god! I guess there's an easier solution. Take the terms to be like a2+b2,
add and subtract 2ab, to get (a+b)2-2ab=2^3x
simplification leads to 1
2^x-2^(x+1)=2^3x
or 6^x=2^2x+2
Only soln is 1!
(sqtr(3) + 1)^2 = 4 + 2sqtr(3).........(sqtr(3) - 1)^2 = 4 - 2sqtr()........2^3 = 8...
Therefore eqution is....> [4 + 2sqtr(3)]^x + [ 4 - 2sqtr(3)]^x = 8^x...........
Since[ 4 + 2sqtr(3)] + [ 4 - 2sqtr(3)] = 8, ....x = 1.
The most simple way:. { 2 }^{ 3x } = { ( }{ 2 }^{ 3 })^{ x } or { (2 }^{ x })^{ 3 }
So: (\sqrt { { 3 }^{ x } } +\quad 1)^{ 2 }\quad +\quad (\sqrt { { 3 }^{ x } } -\quad 1)^{ 2 }\quad =\quad { (2 }^{ 3 })^{ x }
Then: { 3 }^{ x }\quad +\quad 2\sqrt { { 3 }^{ x } } +\quad 1\quad +\quad { 3 }^{ x }\quad -\quad 2\sqrt { { 3 }^{ x } } +\quad 1\quad =\quad { 8 }^{ x }
Now: { 3 }^{ x }\quad +\quad { 3 }^{ x }\quad +\quad 2\quad =\quad { 8 }^{ x }
Just looking at this one (Now), we can afirm that x = 1. If you try x = 2 or bigger, it'll always be wrong. I know that isn't the right way to do this, but, if you don't have the necessary skills, try this way! That's the brazillian way ;)
good question
Yeah its also true.I dont how this people got 1 ans!
The most simple way:. { 2 }^{ 3x } = { ( }{ 2 }^{ 3 })^{ x } or { (2 }^{ x })^{ 3 } So: (\sqrt { { 3 }^{ x } } +\quad 1)^{ 2 }\quad +\quad (\sqrt { { 3 }^{ x } } -\quad 1)^{ 2 }\quad =\quad { (2 }^{ 3 })^{ x } Then: { 3 }^{ x }\quad +\quad 2\sqrt { { 3 }^{ x } } +\quad 1\quad +\quad { 3 }^{ x }\quad -\quad 2\sqrt { { 3 }^{ x } } +\quad 1\quad =\quad { 8 }^{ x } Now:
{ 3 }^{ x }\quad +\quad { 3 }^{ x }\quad +\quad 2\quad =\quad { 8 }^{ x}
Just looking at this one (Now), we can afirm that x = 1. If you try x = 2 or bigger, it'll always be wrong. I know that isn't the right way to do this, but, if you don't have the necessary skills, try this way! That's the brazillian way ;)
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
This looks difficult at first, but notice that the numbers look like part of a trigonometric equation. Rewrite the equation, trying to achieve some recognizable trigonometric value. ( 3 + 1 ) 2 x + ( 3 − 1 ) 2 x ( 3 + 1 ) 2 x + ( 3 − 1 ) 2 x ( 2 2 3 + 1 ) 2 x + ( 2 2 3 − 1 ) 2 x ( 4 6 + 2 ) 2 x + ( 4 6 − 2 ) 2 x ( sin 1 2 5 π ) 2 x + ( cos 1 2 5 π ) 2 x = 2 3 x = ( 2 2 ) 2 x = 1 = 1 = 1 You can solve that by invoking the identity sin 2 θ + cos 2 θ = 1 , seeing that x = 1 is the only solution. Thus, there is 1 solution.