Consider a cubic polynomial f ( x ) with integer coefficients that has three distinct complex roots a , b , c . What are the possible degrees of Q ( a , b , c ) over Q ? Enter the sum of those possible degrees.
Clarification :
Q ( a , b , c ) consists of all complex numbers of the form g ( a , b , c ) where g ( x , y , z ) is a polynomial with rational coefficients. The degree of Q ( a , b , c ) is its dimension as a vector space over Q .
Relevant Wiki : Algebraic number theory .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Thank you, this looks wonderful! (+1)
Clearly, you cover all the possible cases: If f ( x ) is reducible, then the degree must be 1 or 2 (your cases 1 and 2) and if f ( x ) is irreducible the degree will be 3 or 6.
In case 3 you can simply use the "rational root test" to see that x 3 − 3 x + 1 is irreducible.
Now that you are "on a roll": Here is another interesting problem that is still waiting to be solved.
Log in to reply
hmm, interesting, thank you, althought I was wrong in part 1 ,haha. Ok, I'm going to check my book about Euclidean Geometry and Linear Algebra. I hope to do it in a week. I'm seeing that you are posting a lot problems about this...
Log in to reply
What was wrong with part 1? What did I miss?
Log in to reply
@Otto Bretscher – Nothing. It's me. I'm a stupid. Can you believe that I failed your last problem knowing that A T ⋅ A = I 3 and dim ker(A + I) = 2 and dim ker(A -I) = 1 and eigenvectors with different eigenvalues are orthogonal if A is orthogonal?
Log in to reply
@Guillermo Templado – Don't feel too bad... that problem has 22 attempts and 3 solvers thus far ;)
Log in to reply
@Otto Bretscher – I appreciate the link to the algebraic number theory wiki, but I tried to keep everything as down-to-earth as possible, so I didn't talk about e.g. the fact that field extension degrees multiply in towers, or Galois theory, etc. I guess it's a good way to make someone read the whole thing in a fruitless attempt to find something that will solve their problem for them!
Log in to reply
@Patrick Corn – I think the Wiki is still very helpful. If people know any linear algebra, they should be able to figure out that the degrees multiply, based on what they learn in the Wiki. The problem really does not require Galois theory.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
1.- Let the polynomial (x - 1)(x - 2)(x - 3) then Q ( 1 , 2 , 3 ) = Q ⇒ [ Q : Q ] = 1 . Q ( a , b , c ) is the smallest field containing Q and a, b and c. Notice also that Q ( a , b , c ) = Q ( a , b ) due to Vieta's formula a + b + c ∈ Z
2.- Now, let the polynomial x 3 + x then Q ( i , − i , 0 ) = Q ( i ) ⇒ [ Q ( i ) : Q ] = = 2 .
3.-Let the polynomial p ( x ) = x 3 − 3 x + 1 then if θ is a root of p ( x ) , θ 2 − 2 is also a root of p ( x ) and Q ( θ , θ 2 − 2 ) = Q ( θ ) ⇒ [ Q ( θ ) : Q ] = 3 . Let's see that p ( x ) is irreducible over Q . If some root θ of p ( x ) belonged to Q then θ = n m with m,n coprime integers and θ distinct to 1 and -1, then n 3 m 3 = − 1 + 3 n m ⇒ m 3 = n 2 ⋅ ( 3 m − n ) but this a contradiction with the Fundamental Arithmetic Theorem.
4.-And finally, the polynomial x 3 − 2 fullfils [ Q ( 3 2 , 3 2 ⋅ e 3 2 i ⋅ π ) : Q ] = = [ Q ( 3 2 , 3 2 ⋅ e 3 2 i ⋅ π ) : Q ( 3 2 ) ] [ Q ( 3 2 ) : Q ] = 2 × 3 = 6 .
Note.- there aren't more cases. Why?