Sprinkler range revised

Alice wants to water her large, horizontal, flat lawn with a sprinkler. Originally, she placed the sprinkler on the surface of the lawn, but Bob suggested the sprinkler would cover a larger area if it were raised by a tripod.

Should Alice buy the tripod?

Assume that the water is an ideal fluid with no viscosity and other energy losses. Due to air resistance the water droplets from the sprinkler will cover a range of distances, with the smaller droplets flying to shorter distance, covering the full area of a circle. For the largest droplets we can neglect air resistance. The angle of the sprinkler nozzle is set at 45 ^{\circ} relative to the surface. Also, assume that the hose feeding the sprinkler provides a fixed water pressure.

Yes, because the covered area will be larger No, because the covered area will be smaller No, because the covered area will be the same

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Laszlo Mihaly
Jul 13, 2018

For an ideal fluid the velocity v v , the pressure p p and the elevation y y satisfies 1 2 ρ v 2 + ρ g y = p \frac{1}{2}\rho v^2+\rho g y =p , where ρ \rho is the density and g g is the acceleration of gravity. We can turn this to v 2 2 g = y 0 y \frac {v^2}{2g}= y_0-y . Here y 0 = p 0 ρ g y_0=\frac{p_0}{\rho g} represents the pressure in the water line.

The range of the motion is (see, for example, here )

d = v 2 2 g [ 1 + 1 + 2 g y v 2 sin 2 θ ] sin 2 θ = ( y 0 y ) [ 1 + 1 + 2 y y 0 y ] d= \frac{v^2}{2g}\left[ 1 +\sqrt{1+\frac{2gy}{v^2 \sin^2 \theta}}\right]\sin 2 \theta = (y_0-y)\left[ 1 +\sqrt{1+\frac{2y}{y_0-y}}\right]

for θ = 4 5 \theta=45^{\circ} . The maximum of this function is at y = y 0 / 2 y=-y_0/\sqrt{2} and at that point d = y 0 ( 1 + 2 ) d=y_0(1+\sqrt{2}) . Interestingly, that is below ground level. At y 0 = 0 y_0=0 the range is smaller, d = 2 y 0 d=2 y_0 . Any further increase of the elevation will reduce the range.

For smaller droplets, when the resistance by the air is relevant, the range will be smaller and it will depend on the size of the water droplets, creating a wide pattern of impact. This is actually an important factor in designing a good sprinkler. The calculation of the range requires numerical integration, see this web site .

Michael Mendrin
Jul 13, 2018

See Laszlo Mihaly's explanation of this graph, including the fact that having the nozzle below ground gets the maximum range at ground level.

Excellent graph. The red line "envelope" is an interesting extra feature.

Laszlo Mihaly - 2 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

It's been interesting to read about commercially sold sprinkler tripods and why a consumer would want one. "Better coverage" is frequently stressed, but details are unclear.

Michael Mendrin - 2 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

I have found a paper that claims to discuss this, but it has elementary mistakes in equations (1) and (2), https://www.agroengineering.org/index.php/jae/article/view/jae.2012.e4/14 .

Laszlo Mihaly - 2 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

@Laszlo Mihaly Looks like that the paper is assuming a fixed velocity v 0 v_0 at the nozzle, regardless of height, and that the droplets encounter air resistance during the trajectory. As the experimental graphs show, by keeping the same pressure at the nozzle, yes, a higher nozzle will throw farther. A real life spinkler nozzle jet is far from a smooth flow, it's deliberately designed to disperse droplets as uniformly as possible over the "throw".

This problem, however, assumes ideal Bernoulli flow through the hose, nozzle, and even over the trajectory. Kind of like using an open garden hose with no throttling.

Michael Mendrin - 2 years, 11 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...