sin 2 1 8 ∘ + sin 2 3 0 ∘ .
Which of the following is equal to the above expression?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
You should explain why cos 3 6 ∘ + cos 1 0 8 ∘ = 2 1 . That is not obvious.
(Fixed) Typo in the 4th line, should be a - instead of + cos 3 6 ∘ .
In the ancient days, this was known as:
In a unit circle, the sum of areas of the squares constructed on an inscribed regular decagon and hexagon, are equal to that on a pentagon.
Log in to reply
how to prove that?
Log in to reply
I've added a solution that avoids trigonometry. It uses 3-D geometric visualization.
this is really nice sir!
My bad! How 'cos108 degree' comes on 5th line ? Can you explain it for me, please ?
cos36+cos108=1/2.....? and cos72+cos144=- 1/2 ?
i did not understand from line 4.
It's been a really long time since I've done this, but thank you for the notes. This really helps. I guess I need a hell of a lot more practice.
So instead of using identities, I resorted to using actual values and miraculously arrived to a solution. The reason I selected this approach was because 30º is a special angle and its sine can be easily computed; it's one half (simply draw an equilateral triangle, bisect one of the angles, and use the pythagorean theorem to determine the ratio of the sides). Therefore, I was able to collapse the problem a little bit.
sin 2 ( 1 8 ) + sin 2 ( 3 0 ) = sin 2 ( θ ) sin 2 ( 1 8 ) + ( 2 1 ) 2 = sin 2 ( θ ) sin 2 ( 1 8 ) + 4 1 = sin 2 ( θ )
Now, the sine of 18º is not as easily computable as that of 30º, but it can still be done. Take the following 72, 72, 36 triangle:
The non-vertical dotted line bisects the 72º angle on the left, thus creating a smaller 72, 72, 36 triangle at the bottom of the big triangle. I arbitrarily gave a length of 1 to the line that both triangles share. That line is opposite to one of the 72º of the small triangle; therefore, the line that is opposite to the other 72º angle of the small triangle should also have a length of 1; that happens to be the non-vertical dotted line. There is a third triangle: a 36, 36, 108 triangle that rests on top of the smaller 72, 72, 36 triangle. The non-vertical dotted line is opposite to one of the 36º angles of this new triangle; therefore, the line that is opposite to the other 36º angle of the new triangle should have the same length as the non-vertical dotted line, which happens to be 1. As a result the distance from the top of the big triangle to the point where the rightmost line of the big triangle and the non-vertical dotted line intersect is 1. The remaining portion of the rightmost line of the big triangle I simply labeled "X".
The two triangles that have 72º, 72º and 36º as their angles are similar. Therefore, we can write a simple ratio relating the lengths of the sides.
o p p o s i t e 3 6 b i g o p p o s i t e 7 2 b i g = o p p o s i t e 3 6 s m a l l o p p o s i t e 7 2 s m a l l 1 1 + X = X 1
Cross multiply and simplify:
( 1 + X ) ( X ) = ( 1 ) ( 1 ) X + X 2 = 1 X 2 + X − 1 = 0
To solve for "X", use the quadratic formula. Keep in mind that "X" is a distance; therefore, only the positive value matters.
X = 2 ( 1 ) − 1 + 1 2 − 4 ( 1 ) ( − 1 ) X = 2 − 1 + 1 + 4 X = 2 − 1 + 5
Now, to calculate the sine of 18, bisect the 36º angle of the big triangle. Because the big triangle is isosceles, the line that bisects the 36º angle also bisects the line with length 1 at the bottom. This new 18, 72, 90 triangle thus has a side of length 0.5 that is opposite the 18º angle and a hypotenuse of "1 + X". Because we now know the value of "X", we can compute the sine of 18.
sin θ = h y p o t e n u s e o p p o s i t e sin ( 1 8 ) = 1 + X 2 1 sin ( 1 8 ) = 1 + 2 − 1 + 5 2 1 sin ( 1 8 ) = 2 2 + 2 − 1 + 5 2 1 sin ( 1 8 ) = 2 2 − 1 + 5 2 1 sin ( 1 8 ) = 2 1 + 5 2 1 sin ( 1 8 ) = 1 + 5 1 sin ( 1 8 ) = 1 + 5 1 × 1 − 5 1 − 5 sin ( 1 8 ) = 1 − 5 1 − 5 sin ( 1 8 ) = − 4 1 − 5 sin ( 1 8 ) = 4 5 − 1
Now, back to the problem.
sin 2 ( 1 8 ) + 4 1 = sin 2 ( θ ) ( 4 5 − 1 ) 2 + 4 1 = sin 2 ( θ ) 1 6 ( 5 − 1 ) 2 + 4 1 = sin 2 ( θ ) 1 6 5 − 2 5 + 1 + 1 6 4 = sin 2 ( θ ) 1 6 6 − 2 5 + 1 6 4 = sin 2 ( θ ) 1 6 1 0 − 2 5 = sin 2 ( θ ) 8 5 − 5 = sin 2 ( θ ) sin ( θ ) = 8 5 − 5
We will now introduce the variable "U"
U = 2 θ θ = 2 U sin ( 2 U ) = 8 5 − 5
Now, use the half angle identity. I am only concerned with the positive value because all of the angles are in the first quadrant.
2 1 − cos ( U ) = 8 5 − 5 2 1 − cos ( U ) = 8 5 − 5 8 ( 1 − cos ( U ) ) = 2 ( 5 − 5 ) 4 ( 1 − cos ( U ) ) = 5 − 5 4 − 4 cos ( U ) = 5 − 5 − 4 cos ( U ) = 1 − 5 cos ( U ) = − 4 1 − 5 = 4 5 − 1
That number looks awfully familiar. As a matter of fact, we earlier determined that this number is the value for the sine of 18º (see the boxed value above).
cos ( U ) = sin ( 1 8 ) sin ( 9 0 − U ) = sin ( 1 8 ) 9 0 − U = 1 8 U = 9 0 − 1 8 U = 7 2 2 θ = 7 2 θ = 3 6
We will prove that sin 2 1 8 ∘ + sin 2 3 0 ∘ = sin 2 3 6 ∘ .
Here is a "pure synthetic geometry" proof of this result. Consider an icosahedron inscribed in a sphere of radius 1. Let the top vertex by T and the bottom vertex by B .
The bases of the 5 triangles that meet at T would form a regular pentagon. Let these vertices be T 1 , T 2 , T 3 , T 4 , T 5 , and let this plane be Π T .
The bases of the 5 triangles that meet at B would form a regular pentagon. These 2 pentagons are rotated from each other. Let these vertices be B 1 , B 2 , B 3 , B 4 , B 5 , where B 1 is between T 1 and T 5 . Let this plane be Π S .
Consider the projection of T 1 down onto Π S and call it P . Then, by definition T 1 P B 1 forms a right triangle at P . We already have T 1 B 1 = 2 sin 3 6 ∘ and P B 1 = 2 sin 1 8 ∘ from the above discussion. Thus, we just have to show that T 1 C = 2 sin 3 0 ∘ = 1 .
This is pretty obvious and is left as an exercise to the reader.
Hint: Let O be the center of the sphere. How do the points T , O , S relate to planes Π T , Π S ?
How could it be a level 2 question? It should have been level 6 or something like that...
Log in to reply
I think the reason is that this problem can be solved very easily with a calculator. But I agree with you, if you don't use a calculator or Wolfram Alpha this is a problem of a higher level.
Log in to reply
Yes, those who simply used a calculation device may have obtained the answer, but they would not have understood how to solve similar problems properly.
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – I completely agree with you in that respect.
@Calvin Lin – What would one have to do without a calculator or using guess and check on the answer choices? The solutions here all seemed to have worked backwards from already knowing the answer.
Log in to reply
@Ben Lou – If you treat it as "Prove this trigonometric identity", Chew's solution shows a possible approach where you work from both ends.
Alternatively, Fidel's solution of "Let's calculate these actual values and compare" also works.
If you are asking "How do I know that some random trigonometric expression will be equal to something that is very nice", then the honest answer is "Well, in most cases, it will not". E.g. I do not expect sin 2 1 ∘ + sin 2 1 2 ∘ to have a meaningful result. At a meta level, these problems are chosen to showcase an interesting fact, and so we know that there is a "nice" solution.
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – Agree with you that they will have a nice solution... however even knowing that it would be hard to find the answer without the answer choices or a calculator as there are too many answers that could be considered "nice".
How will they use calculators? Even if they compute the value of the expression, the calculator won't give an exact form and they won't be able to deduce that it equals any of the options.
Log in to reply
@Anupam Nayak – There are calculators that give exact values as well as the website Wolfram Alpha. But I see that the members of Brilliant are finding ways of improving the format of the answers so that it is more difficult to solve them just using technology. This makes the questions more interesting and challenging
@Anupam Nayak – Have a look at this link. I could do this on my calculator too. http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=arcsin%E2%88%9A[%28sin+18%29^2+%2B+sin%2830%29^2%29]
First we will prove that cos 7 2 ∘ = 4 5 − 1 . To do this we are going to use the fact that the complex fifth roots of 1, which are different from 1, are w 1 , w 2 , w ˉ 1 , and w ˉ 2 , where w 1 = cos 7 2 ∘ + i sin 7 2 ∘ and w 2 = cos 1 4 4 ∘ + i sin 1 4 4 ∘ . Then ( x − w 1 ) ( x − w ˉ 1 ) ( x − w 2 ) ( x − w ˉ 1 ) = = x − 1 x 5 − 1 = x 4 + x 3 + x 2 + x + 1 . ( ∗ ) Since w 1 + w ˉ 1 = 2 cos 7 2 ∘ , w 2 + w ˉ 2 = 2 cos 1 4 4 ∘ , w 1 w ˉ 1 = 1 , and w 2 w ˉ 2 = 1 then the equation (*) can be written like this ( x 2 − 2 cos 7 2 ∘ x + 1 ) ( x 2 − 2 cos 1 4 4 ∘ x + 1 ) = x 4 + x 3 + x 2 + x + 1 . Expanding the product in the left side of the equation and making corresponding coefficients equal, we obtain the following equations
cos 7 2 ∘ + cos 1 4 4 ∘ = − 2 1 and cos 7 2 ∘ cos 1 4 4 ∘ = − 4 1 .
Therefore cos 7 2 ∘ , and cos 1 4 4 ∘ will be the positive and the negative solutions, respectively, of the equation z 2 + 2 1 z − 4 1 = 0 . Therefore cos 7 2 ∘ = 4 5 − 1 . Now what follows is a lot easier sin 2 1 8 ∘ + sin 2 3 0 ∘ = cos 2 7 2 ∘ + sin 2 3 0 ∘ = ( 4 5 − 1 ) 2 + ( 2 1 ) 2 = = 8 5 − 5 = 2 1 − 4 5 − 1 = 2 1 − cos 7 2 ∘ = sin 2 3 6 ∘
and then the answer must be sin 2 3 6 ∘ .
sin 2 1 8 ∘ + sin 2 3 0 ∘ = sin 2 1 8 ∘ + 4 1 = sin 2 1 8 ∘ + − 4 cos 1 8 ∘ − cos 1 8 ∘ = sin 2 1 8 ∘ + − 4 cos 1 8 ∘ cos 9 0 ∘ − cos 1 8 ∘ = sin 2 1 8 ∘ + − 4 cos 1 8 ∘ − 2 sin 5 4 ∘ sin 3 6 ∘ = sin 2 1 8 ∘ + − 4 cos 1 8 ∘ − 4 sin 5 4 ∘ sin 1 8 ∘ cos 1 8 ∘ = sin 1 8 ∘ ( sin 1 8 ∘ + sin 5 4 ∘ ) = 2 sin 1 8 ∘ sin 3 6 ∘ cos 1 8 ∘ = sin 2 3 6 ∘ □
Let θ = 1 8 ∘ ⇔ 5 θ = 9 0 ∘ ⇔ θ = 9 0 ∘ − 4 θ ⇔ cos θ = sin 4 θ = 4 sin θ cos θ cos 2 θ ⇔ 4 sin θ cos 2 θ = 1 ; [ ∵ cos θ = 1 ] ⇔ 4 sin θ cos ( 5 θ − 3 θ ) = 1 ⇔ 4 sin θ cos ( 9 0 ∘ − 3 θ ) = 1
∴ 4 sin θ sin 3 θ = 1 ..........(i)
Now let
sin 2 α = sin 2 1 8 ∘ + sin 2 3 0 ∘ ⇔ sin 2 α = sin 2 θ + 4 1
⇔ 2 sin 2 α = 2 sin 2 θ + 2 1
⇔ 1 − cos 2 α = 1 − cos 2 θ + 2 1 ⇔ cos 2 θ − cos 2 α = 2 1
⇔ 2 sin ( 2 2 α + 2 θ ) sin ( 2 2 α − 2 θ ) = 2 1
⇔ 4 sin ( α + θ ) sin ( α − θ ) = 1 ..........(ii)
no(i) ≡ no(ii) iff
α + θ = 3 θ and α − θ = θ ⟺ α = 2 θ ∴ α = 2 × 1 8 ∘ = 3 6 ∘
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
X = sin 2 1 8 ∘ + sin 2 3 0 ∘ = 2 1 ( 1 − cos 3 6 ∘ ) + 4 1 = 4 3 − 2 1 cos 3 6 ∘ = 2 1 + 2 1 ˙ 2 1 − 2 1 cos 3 6 ∘ = 2 1 + 2 1 ( cos 3 6 ∘ + cos 1 0 8 ∘ − cos 3 6 ∘ ) [See Note] = 2 1 + 2 1 cos 1 0 8 ∘ = 2 1 + 2 1 ( 2 cos 2 5 4 ∘ − 1 ) = cos 2 5 4 ∘ = sin 2 3 6 ∘
Note:
cos 3 6 ∘ + cos 1 0 8 ∘ = cos 3 6 ∘ + cos ( 3 ( 3 6 ∘ ) ) = cos 3 6 ∘ + 4 cos 3 3 6 ∘ − 3 cos 3 6 ∘ = 2 cos 3 6 ∘ ( 2 cos 2 3 6 ∘ − 1 ) = 2 cos 3 6 ∘ cos 7 2 ∘ = 2 cos 3 6 ∘ sin 1 8 ∘ = cos 1 8 ∘ 2 cos 3 6 ∘ sin 1 8 ∘ cos 1 8 ∘ = cos 1 8 ∘ cos 3 6 ∘ sin 3 6 ∘ = 2 cos 1 8 ∘ sin 7 2 ∘ = 2 cos 1 8 ∘ cos 1 8 ∘ = 2 1