Summer fun #20

Algebra Level 1

1 × 8 + 1 = 9 12 × 8 + 2 = 98 123 × 8 + 3 = 987 \begin{aligned} \color{#D61F06}1\times8+1& =9 \\ \color{#3D99F6}12\times8+2 & =98 \\ \color{#EC7300}123\times8+3 & =987 \end{aligned}

It seems like there's a pattern here, but is the statement below also true? 123456789 × 8 + 9 = 987654321 123456789\times8+9 = 987654321

Yes No

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

37 solutions

I used a calculator

A calculator? Pshaw! I worked it out in my head.

Paul Cockburn - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

I also worked it out in my head.

Ricci Rich - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Yes, me too

Ahmad fikri Azhari - 2 years, 9 months ago

I worked it out on my fingers

Will Potten - 2 years, 9 months ago

Elegant solution.

Bryan Hung - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

and a humorous answer

Kaisei Tanaka - 2 years, 9 months ago

I got 987654315

Tim Kelly - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

you did it wrong

Kaisei Tanaka - 2 years, 9 months ago

i used a calculator too

Kaisei Tanaka - 2 years, 9 months ago

Very innovative. Thinking outside the box

hotdog123 king - 2 years, 9 months ago

我就是在心算了一下以检验前一位和最后两位的合理性。

Anna Li - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Anna -- what is that in English ?

Jesse Otis - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

According to google translate, anna said “I just calculated it to check the rationality of the previous and last two”

Will Potten - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

@Will Potten Will -- Thanks. I had no idea that Google could translate that language. Is that Korean, Chinese, Japanese, etc. ?

Jesse Otis - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

@Jesse Otis @Jesse Otis , doesn't look like Korean and I know Japanese so it's Chinese?

Lucia and Emma - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

@Lucia and Emma Thanks! :-)

Jesse Otis - 2 years, 9 months ago

Good job. Your wonderful and delightful proof has advanced science and math to an unbelievable height, bringing joy and life to us all.

Aidan Bowman - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

is everybody saying that the calculators are wrong. All this maths is proving that you can prove anything mathematically including the world is flat and the sun revolves around the earth if you do not use simple logic and a calculator or simple multiplication and addition

bill boyd - 2 years, 9 months ago

Now that's brilliant! :)

Lucia and Emma - 2 years, 9 months ago

I said 50-50 and the pattern thing looks plausible, so, why not? Obviously I am no mathematician

Michelle Paninopoulos - 2 years, 9 months ago

I am confused. Is this simply an array of numbers, arranged in an interesting pattern, or is it a serial calculation?

Dave Todd - 2 years, 9 months ago

Absolute MADLAD!

Imad Eddine Lasly - 2 years, 9 months ago

haha these days u can just bring a calculator or a Phone!! to ur school.U wont have to do any of the problems!

Apple Gaming - 2 years, 9 months ago

That's called cheating. Wait! Then I am a cheater too.

Abhishek Rathore - 2 years, 8 months ago

I lost it when I saw the number of upvotes to this "solution".

Abha Vishwakarma - 2 years, 8 months ago

baisc math induction.

Stella Xu - 1 year, 9 months ago
David Vreken
Aug 24, 2018

Adding 123456789 123456789 to both sides gives:

Adding another 123456789 123456789 to both sides gives:

which is a true statement.


In general, if A k A_k is a string of consecutive increasing digits from 1 1 to k k , B k B_k is a string of consecutive decreasing digits from 9 9 to 10 k 10 - k , and C k C_k is a string of k k 1 1 's followed by a 0 0 , then by digit addition A k + B k = C k A_k + B_k = C_k for 0 k 9 0 \leq k \leq 9 and 10 A k + k = C k + A k 10A_k + k = C_k + A_k for 0 k 9 0 \leq k \leq 9 . Substituting gives 10 A k + k = ( A k + B k ) + A k 10A_k + k = (A_k + B_k) + A_k and simplifying gives 8 A k + k = B k 8A_k + k = B_k , which is the pattern given in the problem.

I hate math I don't know what those letters mean am lost

Kevin Cadet - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Lol just pretend he’s an annoying Sheldon cooper and ignore it. I like Math but even I got lost following that

Shae Esmail - 2 years, 9 months ago

you add one to the nine not to the eight

Kaisei Tanaka - 2 years, 9 months ago

Where did you learn this?

Manuel Enrique Solano Rodriguez - 2 years, 9 months ago
Naren Bhandari
Aug 23, 2018

N = 1 9 ( 80 ( N k N k 1 ) + k ) = 1 9 ( 80 ( 1234 9 1234 8 ) + 9 ) = 987654321 \begin{aligned} N & = \dfrac{1}{9}\left(80\,(N_{k} -N_{k-1} )+k\right) \\& = \dfrac{1}{9}\left(80\,(1234\cdots 9 -1234\cdots 8) +9 \right)\\& = 987654321\end{aligned} where N k N_{k} and N k 1 N_{k-1} are the numbers in which last digits ends at k k and k 1 k-1 . For example if N k = 1234 N_{k} = 1234 then N k 1 = 123 N_{k-1}= 123 .


Generalization

Notice that the number 1234 k 1234\cdots k for 0 k 9 0 \leq k \leq 9 be denoted as N k N_k and further it can be expressed as N = 8 ( 12345 k ) + k = 8 N k + k = 8 ( 111 1 k 1’s + 111 1 k-1 1’s + 11 + 1 ) + k = 8 9 ( 999 9 k 9’s + 999 9 k-1 9’s + 99 + 9 ) + k = 8 9 ( 1 0 k 1 + 1 0 k 1 1 + 1 0 1 1 ) + k = 8 9 ( 10 ( 1 0 k 1 ) 9 k ) + k \begin{aligned} N & = 8\,(12345 \cdots\cdots k )+k = 8N_k +k \\& =8\,(\underbrace{111\cdots 1}_{\text{k 1's}}+ \underbrace{111\cdots 1 }_{\text{k-1 1's}} + \cdots 11 +1) +k \\& = \dfrac{8}{9}\left(\underbrace{999\cdots 9}_{\text{k 9's}}+ \underbrace{999\cdots 9 }_{\text{k-1 9's}} + \cdots 99 + 9 \right) +k \\& = \dfrac{8}{9}\left(10^k -1 +10^{k-1} -1 +\cdots 10^{1}-1\right) + k \\& = \dfrac{8}{9}\left(\dfrac{10\,(10^k-1)}{9}-k \right)+ k \end{aligned} Simplifying we obtain that N = 8 1 0 k + 1 80 72 k + 81 k 81 = 80 ( 1 0 k 1 ) + k ( 10 1 ) 81 = 9 81 ( 80 k = 1 k 1 1 0 k + k ) = 1 9 ( 80 ( N k + 1 N k ) + k ) \begin{aligned} N & =\dfrac{8\cdot 10^{k+1}-80 -72k+81k }{81}\\& =\dfrac{80\cdot \,(10^{k}-1) +k\,(10-1) }{81}\\& = \dfrac{9}{81} \left(80\sum_{k=1}^{k-1} 10^k +k\right) \\ & = \dfrac{1}{9}\left(80\,(N_{k+1}-N_{k})+k \right) \end{aligned}

Note: This pattern will continue till k 9 k\leq 9 but a new pattern will exist where formula works too. 1234567890 × 8 + 0 = 9876543120 12345678901 × 8 + 1 = 98765431209 123456789012 × 8 + 2 = 987654312098 \begin{aligned} 1234567890×8+0 & =9876543120 \\ 12345678901×8+1 & = 98765431209\\ 123456789012\times 8 +2 & =987654312098 \\\vdots \end{aligned}

Naren, yes, that's what I thought too.

Not.

Mark Mazda - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Mark Mazda lol! The people on this site reveal what a complete idiot I truly am. Is it the subpar math education in the US (worse by far when I was a child than it is now IMO), or am I truly just as dumb as a brick? I'm afraid I may never know.

Naren, your solution seems brilliant. Although I admit I only vaguely grasp what you are doing.

Michelle Paninopoulos - 2 years, 9 months ago

This seems like you are just over complicating things

Noah Lewis - 2 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

sdlakjfl;kafuiopdfasdfsadfasdfsadfsadfsadfsadfsadfsdasdfsdfasdfsadfsdfsadfsasafsadfsafwaerufg q3r891374387593247845897349857348957389475

DYLAN MARSHALL - 2 years, 8 months ago
Arjen Vreugdenhil
Aug 27, 2018

Generalization

In number base b b , it is generally true that for 1 n b 1 1 \leq n \leq b-1 , 123 ( n 1 ) n × ( b 2 ) + n = ( b 1 ) ( b 2 ) ( b n + 1 ) ( b n ) . \overline{123\cdots (n-1)\ n} \times (b-2) + n = \overline{(b-1)\ (b-2)\ \cdots (b-n+1)\ (b-n)}.

Proof : 123 ( n 1 ) n × ( b 2 ) + n = ( i = 1 n i b n i ) ( b 2 ) + n = ( i = 1 n i b b n i ) ( i = 1 n i b n i ) ( i = 1 n i b n i ) + n = ( i = 0 n 1 ( i + 1 ) b n i ) ( i = 0 n 1 i b n i ) combine n b n n ( i = 1 n i b n i ) + n = ( i = 0 n 1 ( i + 1 i ) b n i ) ( i = 1 n i b n i ) + n n = ( i = 0 n 1 b n i ) ( i = 1 n i b n i ) = ( i = 1 n b b n i ) ( i = 1 n i b n i ) combine = i = 1 n ( b i ) b n i = ( b 1 ) ( b 2 ) ( b n + 1 ) ( b n ) . \begin{aligned} \overline{123\cdots (n-1)\ n} \times (b-2) + n & = \left(\sum_{i=1}^n i\cdot b^{n-i}\right)\cdot (b-2) + n \\ & = \left(\sum_{i=1}^n ib\cdot b^{n-i}\right) - \left(\sum_{i=1}^n i\cdot b^{n-i}\right) - \left(\sum_{i=1}^n i\cdot b^{n-i}\right) + n \\ & = \underbrace{\left(\sum_{i'=0}^{n-1} (i'+1)\cdot b^{n-i'}\right) - \left(\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} i\cdot b^{n-i}\right)}_{\text{combine}} - n\cdot b^{n-n} - \left(\sum_{i=1}^n i\cdot b^{n-i}\right) + n \\ & = \left(\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} (i+1-i)\cdot b^{n-i}\right) - \left(\sum_{i=1}^n i\cdot b^{n-i}\right) + \underbrace{ n - n }\\ & = \left(\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} b^{n-i}\right) - \left(\sum_{i=1}^n i\cdot b^{n-i}\right) \\ & = \underbrace{\left(\sum_{i'=1}^n b\cdot b^{n-i'}\right) - \left(\sum_{i=1}^n i\cdot b^{n-i}\right)}_{\text{combine}} \\ & = \sum_{i=1}^n (b-i)\cdot b^{n-i} \\ & = \overline{(b-1)\ (b-2)\ \cdots (b-n+1)\ (b-n)}. \end{aligned}

can you please explain more elementarily

Mohammad Farhat - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Others have posted the more elementary solution for b = 10 b = 10 .

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 2 years, 9 months ago

Arjen -- Is there, like, an elementary NAME for what on earth this is about ? What would math-challenged people like me refer to it as (other than mind-boggling) ?

Jesse Otis - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Yeah, I guess it is a bit intimidating-looking. The basic idea is that when we write numerals, we express a number as a sum of powers of the base (usually 10). For example, 1234 = 1000 + 200 + 30 + 4 1234 = 1000 + 200 + 30 + 4 1234 = 1 1 0 3 + 2 1 0 2 + 3 1 0 1 + 4 1 0 0 1234 = 1\cdot 10^3 + 2\cdot 10^2 + 3\cdot 10^1 + 4\cdot 10^0 1234 = i = 1 4 i 1 0 4 i 1234 = \sum_{i=1}^4 i\cdot 10^{4-i} 1234 = i = 1 4 i b 4 i b = 10 1234 = \sum_{i=1}^4 i\cdot b^{4-i}\ \ \ \ \ b = 10 Basically, in my solution I start with the number whose digits are 1234 n \overline{1234\cdots n} , write it as a sum, then manipulate that sum until it becomes 9876 ( 10 n ) \overline{9876\cdots (10-n)} . Then, instead of 10 (our usual decimal system) I show that it works in any number base b b .

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Yes ... you generalized Naren Bhandari solution where b=10 to any base

Kenneth Wada - 2 years, 9 months ago

Fascinating stuff; the Lord blessed you with an incredible mind. I was thinking that the 'overline' indicates that the number group is repeating - like is written with repeating numbers to the right of a decimal point; that is one of the things that threw me off. In this case the overline must indicate that the numbers (variables) below it are summed. True ?

Jesse Otis - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

@Jesse Otis The overline indicates that the expressions must be interpreted as digits. For instance, a b c abc normally means the product of a a , b b , and c c ; but a b c \overline{abc} stands for the number with digits a a , b b , and c c . In the same way, 1234 n 1234n may be understood as 1234 × n 1234\times n , but 1234 n \overline{1234n} stands for a 5-digit numeral.

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 2 years, 9 months ago
Kelvin Okoromhun
Aug 28, 2018

I used a calculator for the solution.

Thank you, why over-complicate things?!

Jeff Phillips - 2 years, 9 months ago
Samuel Emeka
Aug 27, 2018

From the three examples we observe this: 10^y(x) + 10^y-1(x+1).......10^0(x+y) × 8 + (x+y) = 10^y(n) +10^y-1(n-1)........10^0(n-y) for x=1,0< y < 9,and n=9. So for 123456789 we observe that y is 8. Next we substitute accordingly: 10^8(1) +10^7(2) +10^6(3) + 10^5(4) +10^4(5) + 10^3(6) +10^2(7) + 10^1(8) + 10^0(9) × 8 + (9) = 10^8(9) + 10^7(8) +10^6(7) +10^5(6) + 10^4(5) + 10^3(4) + 10^2(3) + 10^1(2) +10^0(1); So we get 100000000 + 20000000+3000000+400000+50000+6000+700+80+9 × 8 + 9 = 900000000+80000000+7000000+600000+50000+4000+300+20+1;This gives:123456789 × 8 + 9 = 987654321

looks crazy...easy to think tho

Akshay Krishna - 2 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

it can also be done by mere observation

Samuel Emeka - 2 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

Not that kind of crazy...it's not formatted. (Beautiful observation tho)

Akshay Krishna - 2 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

@Akshay Krishna explain please

Samuel Emeka - 2 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

@Samuel Emeka It's not formatted, which in a way is the reason it's underrated. Consider using rajex(or whatever brilliant uses).

Akshay Krishna - 2 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

@Akshay Krishna add a comment...OK u mean I should use formalas

Samuel Emeka - 2 years, 7 months ago

Log in to reply

@Samuel Emeka https://brilliant.org/discussions/thread/beginner-latex-guide/

Akshay Krishna - 2 years, 7 months ago
Avram Victor
Aug 27, 2018

Just use a calculator

I just answer yes

Great solution! This made me think about the problem from a new perspective.

Sean Bean - 2 years, 9 months ago

We start by expressing the left hand side ( L ) (L) and the right hand side ( R ) (R) in analytical form.

For a given integer N N with N = [ 1 , 2 , 3 , , 9 ] N=[1,2,3,\cdots,9] we have L ( N ) = 8 n = 1 N n 1 0 N n + N \begin{aligned} L(N)=8* \sum_{n=1}^N n*10^{N-n}+N \end{aligned} R ( N ) = n = 1 N ( 10 n ) 1 0 N n \begin{aligned} R(N)=\sum_{n=1}^N(10-n)*10^{N-n} \end{aligned} For example, for N = 1 N=1 L ( 1 ) = 8 ( 1 1 0 1 1 ) + 1 = 9 \begin{aligned} L(1) = 8*(1*10^{1-1}) + 1 = 9\end{aligned} R ( 1 ) = ( 10 1 ) 1 0 1 1 = 9 \begin{aligned} R(1) = (10-1)*10^{1-1} = 9 \end{aligned}

and for N = 3 N=3 L ( 3 ) = 8 ( 1 1 0 3 1 + 2 1 0 3 2 + 3 1 0 3 3 ) + 3 = 8 123 + 3 = 987 \begin{aligned} L(3)=8*(1*10^{3-1}+2*10^{3-2}+3*10^{3-3})+3=8*123+3=987\end{aligned} R ( 3 ) = 9 1 0 3 1 + 8 1 0 3 2 + 7 1 0 3 3 = 900 + 80 + 7 = 987 \begin{aligned} R(3)=9*10^{3-1}+8*10^{3-2}+7*10^{3-3}=900+80+7=987\end{aligned} .

To prove that L ( N ) = R ( N ) L(N)=R(N) for all integers N N , 1 N 9 1 \leq N \leq 9 one could show that the expression for L ( N ) L(N) can be reduced to the one for R ( N ) R(N) (or vice-versa) for N N in the range of interest.

An alternate approach is to use recursion i.e. express L ( N + 1 ) L(N+1) as a function of L ( N ) L(N) and similarly for R ( N + 1 ) R(N+1) . From the analytical forms above for L ( N ) L(N) and R ( N ) R(N) one finds that L ( N + 1 ) = 10 L ( N ) N + 9 \begin{aligned} L(N+1) = 10*L(N) - N + 9 \end{aligned} R ( N + 1 ) = 10 R ( N ) N + 9 \begin{aligned} R(N+1) = 10*R(N) - N + 9 \end{aligned}

Since L ( 1 ) = R ( 1 ) L(1)=R(1) , it follows that L ( N ) = R ( N ) L(N) = R(N) for 1 N 9 1 \leq N \leq 9 .

Ashraf Wani
Sep 1, 2018

I just added last digit of 8x9 with 9 to see if last digit comes out as 1

I did the same

Hans Isbrücker - 2 years, 8 months ago
Ilyass Habbou
Aug 30, 2018

The method that I used was that in the first sum they gave us 1 that's the first number in the order of first to last the answer to that sum was 9 and that was the first number in the order of last to first and if u see the last sum the first number they give is the number 1-9 in the order of first to last and the answer to that sum was 1-9 but in the opposite order to the first number so the sum must have been correct

Anand Prakash
Sep 2, 2018

there's a pattern of complimentary. For e.g. complimentary of 1 is 9, while their sum must be 10, i.e 1+9=10, subsequently 2+8=10, 3+7=10, 4+6=10. Starting from right. For 12, complimentary for individual 1 and 2 are 9 and 8. For 123 complimentary for 1,2 and 3 are 9,8 and 7 respectively. On applying this to 123456789, complimentary for individual digits become 987654321. I solved it like that.

Punay D.A. 213
Sep 2, 2018

1 x8+1=9 ;- 1+9=10 12 ×8+1=98 ;- 1+9=2+8=10 that's the pattern i think

Frank Livingston
Sep 1, 2018

I used pencil and paper and regular multiplication and addition

Killian Hoover
Sep 1, 2018

The number added is the same as the amount of digits in the first and last number given in each equation. The one in question follows

Cristian Barreto
Aug 31, 2018

No “muh calculator” needed...

12345677
123456789
* 8
——————
987654312
+
9
——————
987654321
Ola Czapiewska
Aug 31, 2018

It's like when you see in example No.1, 1×8+1=9 we see two last numbers 1 and 9 with equals 10. At the example No.2 we see the same thing 12×8+2=98 with we see 2 added this time and last digit is 8 which equals 10. The last example is the same 123×8+3=987 3(added) and last digit we see 7 are both giving us 10.

Which moving to actual statement 9+1=10 so this has to be true.

Ps. Sorry if something doesn't make sense, English is not my first language.

B D
Aug 31, 2018

Use a calculator.

Abductive Logic; C.S. Peirce; from Harvard circa ~1840ish; a.k.a. discovery logic/educated guess. Frrom final digit number in statement; worked via the provided pattern construct; yielding a final digit, matching that in the statement provided - I took a leap of faith; guessed re the match; ended up being right !!

Beenish Ansari
Aug 31, 2018

The number added =to th e number of digits of answer

Fernando Duran
Aug 30, 2018

9=1

Mohammad Farhat
Aug 30, 2018

My trusty calculator is the reason we humans do not tear our brains apart

Sami Kymisis
Aug 30, 2018

I took a healthy guess

Jesus Curiel
Aug 30, 2018

It is simple.

The first three problems go by the next formula.

(x) x 8 + (n) = (r).

  • x going by the digits on increasing ratio starting by 1 (like 1,12,123 and etcetera).

  • n going by the number of digits of x number.

  • r going by the result that is easily digits on decreasing ratio starting by 9 but just allowing the number of digits that n tolds us.

So just by checking this formula on the forth problem we can tell that is true.

ps. Sorry don't know how to use latex but this is the only way i can explain how i resolve this problem also english isnt my native lang so it may be kinda sketchy to read.

Livent Liang
Aug 30, 2018

It can be proved by mathematical induction (at a mini scale):

First one is obviously true: 1 × 8 + 1 = 9 1 \times 8 + 1 = 9

The problem is to prove: S n = 12... n × 8 + n = 9... ( 10 n ) S_{n} = 12...n \times 8 + n = 9...(10-n)

given that: S n 1 = 12... ( n 1 ) × 8 + n 1 = 9... ( 9 n ) S_{n-1} = 12...(n-1) \times 8 + n-1 = 9...(9-n)

Actually we just needed to do some algebra with: S n = S n 1 × 10 + 9 n S_{n} = S_{n-1} \times 10 + 9-n .

Then it will become Sn on both sides and end of proof!

you spelt proof as prove. Wrong grammar

Mohammad Farhat - 2 years, 9 months ago
Xeeshan Alam
Aug 30, 2018

I Used My Mind

Well I suppose you use your mind everything, don't you? (Even writing it down is still using your brain)

Lucia and Emma - 2 years, 9 months ago
Peter Rushforth
Aug 29, 2018

Logic. There was a pattern for the first 3, so why would it change. The pattern remained for the question so logically the question was correct.

Samuel Agah
Aug 29, 2018

Ideally, first of all you should multiply 123456789 with 8. So I just multiplied their last digits i.e 9×8=72. So you know the answer's last digit is 2. Then 2+9 is 11. The last digit of your final answer should be 1 which corresponds to 987654321

My idea was to multiply the long number by ten then substract the double of the first digit which is 9 so the double is 18 then 0-8 practically will give 2. Adding 9 to it will give 1 at the first digit of the result. Thus the answer was correct. This was my method

Arnaud Browet
Aug 29, 2018

Hello,

Here is how I get it:

Suppose that n 9 n \leq 9 and the n t h n^{th} equation can be written as k n = ( i = 1 n 1 0 n i . i ) . 8 + n = ( 1234... n ) . 8 + n k_n = \left(\sum_{i=1}^n 10^{n-i}.i\right) .8 + n = (1234...n) . 8 + n Then k n + 1 = ( i = 1 n + 1 1 0 n + 1 i . i ) . 8 + n + 1 = 10. ( i = 1 n 1 0 n i . i ) . 8 + 8 ( n + 1 ) + n + 1 i.e. removing i=n+1 from the sum = 10. ( i = 1 n 1 0 n i . i ) . 8 + 10. n 10. n + 8 ( n + 1 ) + n + 1 i.e. adding & removing 10n = 10. [ ( i = 1 n 1 0 n i . i ) . 8 + n ] + 9 n = 10. k n + 9 n \begin{array}{rcl} k_{n+1} &=& \left(\sum_{i=1}^{n+1} 10^{n+1-i}.i\right) .8 + n+1 \\ & = & 10. \left(\sum_{i=1}^n 10^{n-i}.i\right) .8 + 8(n+1) + n+1 \qquad \textrm{i.e. removing i=n+1 from the sum} \\ & = & 10. \left(\sum_{i=1}^n 10^{n-i}.i\right) .8 + 10.n - 10.n + 8(n+1) + n+1 \qquad \textrm{i.e. adding \& removing 10n} \\ & = & 10. \left[ \left(\sum_{i=1}^n 10^{n-i}.i\right) .8 +n \right] + 9 - n \\ & = & 10.k_n + 9 - n \end{array} or switching n + 1 n+1 by n n k n = 10 k n 1 + ( 10 n ) k_n = 10 k_{n-1} + \left( 10 - n\right)

Since it holds for n = 1 n=1 , one can show that it holds for n = 2 n=2 and so on.

Knowing that it then holds for n = 8 k 8 = 98765432 n=8 \Rightarrow k_8 = 98765432 , one can get that k 9 = 10. k 8 + ( 10 9 ) = 987654321 k_9 = 10.k_8 + (10-9) = 987654321

Drd 314
Aug 28, 2018

Simply check the first and last digits to approximate the solution.

9 x 8 = 72 + 9 = _1

8 x 1 = 8 + 1 (carried over) = 9

The first, and more importantly, last digits work out, so it is likely correct.

Note: this is not a guaranteed method, it is just a quick approximation.

Matt Maloney
Aug 28, 2018

Just a note of interest:

1
2
3
4
5
6
123456789×8+9 = 987654321
1234567891×8+91 = 9876543219
12345678912×8+902 = 98765432198
123456789123×8+9003 = 987654321987
1234567891234×8+90004 = 9876543219876
...

Jasper Escuro
Aug 28, 2018

Easy problem! Just use a calculator haha.

Kieran Halfpenny
Aug 28, 2018

I did 123 x 8 + 1 and got it. So I did 123456789 x 8 + 9 and it had to be true.

Darel Guinia
Aug 28, 2018

1+1👌👌 uso talaga to isigaw mo gago!!! 😏😏😏😏

Ido Wiseman
Aug 27, 2018

321 9 = 312 321 - 9 = 312

Now, since 312 312 is divisible by 8 8 and 987654000 987654000 is also divisible by 8 8 then this statement is definitely true.

Uros Stojkovic
Aug 27, 2018

Let a n = n a_{n} = n for n = { 1 , 2 , 3 , , 8 , 9 } n = \left\{1, 2, 3, \cdots , 8, 9\right\} . It follows that a n = a n 1 + 1. a_{n} = a_{n-1} + 1. Then, we have: S n = 123 a n 1 a n × 8 + a n = 10 × 123 a n 1 × 8 + 9 a n = 10 × 123 a n 1 × 8 + 9 a n 1 + 9 = 10 × ( 123 a n 1 × 8 + a n 1 ) + ( 9 a n 1 ) = 10 × S n 1 + 10 a n S n = 10 × ( S n 1 + 1 ) n \begin{aligned} S_{n} &= \overline{123\cdots a_{n-1}a_{n}}\times 8 + a_{n} \\ &= 10\times \overline{123\cdots a_{n-1}}\times 8 + 9a_{n} \\ &= 10\times \overline{123\cdots a_{n-1}}\times 8 + 9a_{n-1} + 9 \\ &= 10\times \left ( \overline{123\cdots a_{n-1}}\times 8 + a_{n-1}\right) + \left ( 9-a_{n-1} \right ) \\ &= 10\times S_{n-1} + 10 - a_{n} \\ S_{n} &= 10\times(S_{n-1}+1) - n \end{aligned} We can see that this indeed follows the given patern. So without explicitly calculating, based on first simple cases, we can conclude that the statement is true.

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...