Compute n → ∞ lim 1 + 2 2 + 3 3 + ⋯ + n n π ⋅ n . Give your answer to 2 decimal places.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I have a doubt sir. when you say ∑ k = 1 n k k is asymptotically equal to n I can only see it applying Stolz,are you applying Stolz Criterium? I'm not sure how do you do it
Log in to reply
No, just a simple ϵ -argument... all I'm saying is that the average value of 1 , . . . n n goes to 1 as we let n go to infinity.
Log in to reply
thank you very much,althought anyway I only get understand you with Stolz. If noone posts a solution with Stolz, I'll post a solution with this one later.
Log in to reply
@Guillermo Templado – What I'm saying is this: If a decreasing sequence a n approaches a limit a , then the average b n = n ∑ k = 1 n a k will also approach a ; that follows directly from the definitions.
Log in to reply
@Otto Bretscher – thank you very much, I got it now, althought it's not necessary a n decreasing,is it? If lim n → ∞ a n = a , then lim n → ∞ n ∑ k = 1 n a k = a
Log in to reply
@Guillermo Templado – Nope. In Stolz lemma, only b_n is required to monotonically increase/decrease (so it diverge).
@Guillermo Templado – "decreasing" (or "increasing") is not logically necessary, but it makes the argument easier. I include the condition when I do problems like that in my calculus classes, as a special case of lim x → ∞ x 1 ∫ 0 x f ( t ) d t = lim x → ∞ f ( x ) if the last limit exists.
Log in to reply
@Otto Bretscher – I don't usually question the comments or answers, because the only right answer must be found by oneself, sometimes I simply prefer to laugh... Thank you again, for your time this time, it wasn't neccesary. This isn't a clever question, you are a clever person ,it's different.
ok,I think I'm understanding you now, considerating lim k → ∞ k k = 1
What is ϵ -argument? Is it Epsilon delta?
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – Well, there is no delta in a sequence, only an epsilon ;) For every ϵ > 0 there is an n such that the average of 1 , . . , n n < 1 + ϵ
Log in to reply
@Otto Bretscher – Is this something obvious (the average is less than 1 + epsilon)? I don't think it's a common fact. You might want to prove it rigorously.
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – It's pretty obvious for a decreasing sequence a n with limit a , yes. Given any ϵ > 0 , there exists an N such that a n < a + 2 ϵ whenever n > N . By adding enough terms past the N 'th, we can push the average below a + ϵ .
Log in to reply
@Otto Bretscher – Hmmmm... Either I'm getting rusty in my calculus or you're setting too high of a standard for us.... I think it's most likely the latter case. HHAAHAHAHAHA
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – I'm adding my answer one sentence at a time, since my "brilliant.org" often crashes. See the whole answer, please. Does it make more sense now?
Log in to reply
@Otto Bretscher – Ah that made sense. You should post that in your solution.... Or just use Stolz Cesaro Theorem hahahahaahhaha
* Stolz Criterium *
Let { a n } and { b n } two sequences such that:
lim n → ∞ a n = 0 or ∞ ,and { b n } is monotonically decreasing and lim n → ∞ b n = 0 or monotone increasing and diverging to + ∞ . lim n → ∞ b n + 1 − b n a n + 1 − a n = λ , λ ∈ R Then the limit:
lim n → ∞ b n a n = λ .
In this case
n → ∞ lim n + 1 n + 1 π ⋅ ( n + 1 ) − π ⋅ n = n → ∞ lim n + 1 n + 1 π = π ⇒ n → ∞ lim 1 1 + 2 2 + … + n n π ⋅ n = π
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Clever problem! I will have to assign this in a calculus exam some time.
∑ k = 1 n k k is asymptotically equal to n since lim n → ∞ k k = 1 , so that the limit we seek is π ≈ 3 . 1 4