Three differently sized circles and a line can be positioned so that they are all mutually tangent to one another, as shown below. If the largest circle has radius 225 and the medium circle has radius 100, what is the radius of the smallest circle?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Could you please use Latex ?
Log in to reply
I edited my solution to use Latex. Thanks for the tip!
Great solution. Also for the shortcut: Ford Circles
Log in to reply
Thanks! Another (related) shortcut is the specialized case for Descartes' Theorem k4 = k1 + k2 ± 2√(k1k2) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Descartes%27 theorem#Special cases), where k is defined as the curvature 1/r for each circle. In this case, k4 = 1/225 + 1/100 + 2√((1/225)(1/100)) = 1/36, and so r = 36.
Log in to reply
How do we know when to use + or - in the theorem?
Log in to reply
@Aman Thegreat – This theorem gives a radius of a circle that is mutually tangent to the two existing circles and the line, and sometimes there are two possibilities for this, which is why there is a plus or minus sign. Using minus instead of plus in the theorem results in a radius of 900, which is too big for our problem. (However, there also exists a circle with a radius of 900 that is mutually tangent to the two existing circles and the line, but this circle would loom over the existing two circles somewhere on the right side so that its bottom curve would touch the existing circles somewhere at their top right and touch the line somewhere to the right of the diagram.)
How you have used Latex? It will be really great helpful for me if you tell me the tips.
Log in to reply
I found this website and this website helpful. Also, when you write a solution on brilliant you can preview it before posting to make sure everything turned out the way you wanted it.
This problem is a "special case" for Descartes' Circle Theorem , where the straight line can be said to have an infinite radius, which means it's curvature is 0.
r 4 1 r 4 = 2 2 5 1 + 1 0 0 1 ± 2 2 2 5 1 × 1 0 0 1 = 2 2 5 1 + 1 0 0 1 + 7 5 1 = 3 6 1 = 3 6 + is taken since 4th circle is not internally tangent
Log in to reply
Is there such a formula for 5 circles?
Log in to reply
I don't think it's possible for 5 circles to all be mutually tangent to each other, because the centers of 3 circles form a unique triangle, and the 4th is either the + or - solution of Descartes' Circle Theorem. There is, however, a formula for 5 spheres in three dimensions (see here ).
The case have an errors
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Three right triangles can be constructed, where each hypotenuse is the segment between the centers of two circles and therefore the sum of the two radii of those two circles, and each vertical leg is the difference between the two radii of those same two circles, as pictured below:
In the blue right triangle where the hypotenuse is between the center of the largest circle with a radius of 225 and the center of the medium circle with a radius of 100, the hypotenuse is 225 + 100 = 325, and the vertical leg is 225 – 100 = 125, which means the horizontal leg z is z = 3 2 5 2 − 1 2 5 2 by the Pythagorean Theorem, and simplifies to z = 300.
In the green right triangle where the hypotenuse is between the center of the largest circle with a radius of 225 and the center of the smallest circle with an unknown radius r, the hypotenuse is 225 + r, and the vertical leg is 225 – r, which means the horizontal leg x is x = ( 2 2 5 + r ) 2 − ( 2 2 5 − r ) 2 by the Pythagorean Theorem, and simplifies to x = ( ( 2 2 5 + r ) + ( 2 2 5 − r ) ) ( ( 2 2 5 + r ) − ( 2 2 5 − r ) ) = 4 5 0 ⋅ 2 r = 9 0 0 r = 3 0 r .
In the red right triangle where the hypotenuse is between the center of the medium circle with a radius of 100 and the center of the smallest circle with an unknown radius r, the hypotenuse is 100 + r, and the vertical leg is 100 – r, which means the horizontal leg y is y = ( 1 0 0 + r ) 2 − ( 1 0 0 − r ) 2 by the Pythagorean Theorem, and simplifies to y = ( ( 1 0 0 + r ) + ( 1 0 0 − r ) ) ( ( 1 0 0 + r ) − ( 1 0 0 − r ) ) = 2 0 0 ⋅ 2 r = 4 0 0 r = 2 0 r .
The two smaller horizontal segments x and y add up to the larger horizontal segment z, so x + y = z, and substituting x = 3 0 r , y = 2 0 r and z = 300 gives 3 0 r + 2 0 r = 300. This means 5 0 r = 300, and r = 6, and r = 36.