x n − y n = 2 2 0 1 6
x , y and n are positive integers, with n > 1 such that the above is true. How many solutions in ( x , y , n ) are there?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
[Solution has been edited, so this comment might not make sense.]
I'm not sure what the argument in case 3 is. Why couldn't we have n = 6 , m = 3 ? It might make more sense if case 4 was done before case 3.
Log in to reply
Sorry, there was a small typo in the concluding statement. It was meant to refer to the minimality of k , as opposed to n .
Log in to reply
Then, for case 3, can you update "Assume such a solution exists, such that n is minimal" into k ?
But still, what is the contradiction? Why can't we have x 6 − y 6 = 2 k and x 3 − y 3 = 2 l for some l < k ? We have not shown that x 3 − y 3 = 2 l cannot be attained, nor is it a "smaller" solution set of this case.
This is why I think it would make more sense if case 4 was done before case 3.
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – I see what you mean. Yeah, I'll fix that.
Log in to reply
@Sharky Kesa – Looks much better now. Thanks!
I edited the case 4 argument slightly, to better express why we have the contradiction.
Since there are no solutions for n ≥ 3 , there are no solutions when n ≥ 3 has an odd prime factor, and hence we only need consider the cases where n is a power of 2 . If x 2 m − y 2 m = 2 2 0 1 6 then x 2 m − 1 = 2 1 0 0 7 + a + 2 1 0 0 7 − a , y 2 m − 1 = 2 1 0 0 7 + a − 2 1 0 0 7 − a 1 ≤ a ≤ 1 0 0 7 If m ≥ 2 then y 2 m − 1 = 2 1 0 0 7 − a ( 2 2 a − 1 ) is a perfect square, and hence a is odd and 2 2 a − 1 is a perfect square, which is impossible. Thus the only possibility is m = 1 , so that n = 2 , and we have our 1 0 0 7 solutions.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
My solution to this question was using a case bash.
Case 1: n > 1 is odd
We will show this has no solutions for the general case x n − y n = 2 k , where k is a non-negative integer. Assume such a solution exists, such that k is minimal.
By parity, x and y are either both odd or both even. If they are both odd, we have
( x − y ) ( x n − 1 + x n − 2 y + … + y n − 1 ) = 2 k
There are an odd number of odd terms in the second bracket so this is impossible. Therefore, x and y are both even. Let x = 2 a and y = 2 b . We have
2 n a n − 2 n b n a n − b n = 2 k = 2 k − n
If k − n > 0 , then this contradicts the minimality argument. If k − n = 0 , we have a n − b n = 1 , which is impossible for odd n > 1 . Therefore, there are no solutions.
Case 2: n = 2
x 2 − y 2 ⟹ ( x + y ) ( x − y ) ⟹ x + y x − y ⟹ x y ⟹ ( a , b ) = 2 2 0 1 6 = 2 2 0 1 6 = 2 a = 2 b = 2 a − 1 + 2 b − 1 = 2 a − 1 − 2 b − 1 = ( 2 0 1 5 , 1 ) , ( 2 0 1 4 , 2 ) , … , ( 1 0 0 9 , 1 0 0 7 )
Therefore, there are 1007 solutions in this case.
Case 3: n = 4
x 4 − y 4 y 4 + ( 2 5 0 4 ) 4 = 2 2 0 1 6 = x 4
This has no solutions by Fermat's Last Theorem .
Case 4: n > 4 , n is even
We will show this has no solutions for the general case x n − y n = 2 k , where k is a non-negative integer. Assume such a solution exists, such that n is minimal. Let n = 2 m . We then have
x 2 m − y 2 m ( x m − y m ) ( x m + y m ) = 2 k = 2 k
From this, we must have x m − y m = 2 a , for a non-negative integer a ≤ k . Either m is even and strictly greater than 4, m = 4 (case 3) or m is odd (case 1). Since there are no solutions in case 1 or 3, hence m is even and strictly greater than 4. This creates a contradiction since we assumed k to be minimal. Therefore, no solutions exist for n even and n > 4 .
Overall these cases, there is a total of 1007 solutions.