The Answer Is Not 0.225

Algebra Level 5

What is the smallest real number k k (to 3 decimal places), such that for all ordered triples of non-negative reals ( a , b , c ) (a,b,c) which satisfy a + b + c = 1 a + b + c = 1 , we have

a 1 c + b 1 a + c 1 b 1 + k ? \frac{ a}{ \sqrt{1-c} } + \frac{b} { \sqrt{1-a} } + \frac{ c} { \sqrt{1-b} } \leq 1 + k ?


The answer is 0.250.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Calvin Lin Staff
Apr 2, 2014

[This is not a solution.]

The maximum is achieved at ( 0 , 3 4 , 1 4 ) ( 0, \frac{3}{4}, \frac{1}{4} ) and cyclic permutations, which gives k = 0.250 k = 0.250 .

Now it's up to you to prove that

a 1 c + b 1 a + c 1 b 1.25. \frac{ a}{ \sqrt{1-c} } + \frac{b} { \sqrt{1-a} } + \frac{ c} { \sqrt{1-b} } \leq 1.25.

Could you please explain how maximum is achieved at (0,3/4,1/4)?

Vijay Ganti - 7 years, 2 months ago

did you use partial differentiation?

Vol Vox - 7 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Currently, the only method that I know of is to use lagrange multipliers. This is not an easy problem to approach, and the unequal roots makes it harder to use classical methods.

Calvin Lin Staff - 7 years, 1 month ago

how did you got (0, 3/4, 1/4) ?

Cilese Curaming - 7 years, 2 months ago

I do have a nice algebraic proof but its somewhat long .

Aakash Khandelwal - 5 years ago

Log in to reply

You should post it!

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years ago

Why not .225 (with 1/3,1/3,1/3)

Karan Bhuwalka - 7 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

we are finding max value for 'k'.. thats y. not 0.225 but 0.250.

Nisarg Thakkar - 7 years, 1 month ago

with (1/2,1/2,0) we get 1.207 can you explain the solution? i went on with random values for a,b and c. which gives k=0.207

Nisarg Thakkar - 7 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

As remarked, substituting in (0, 3/4, 1/4) gives us the value of 0.25, and hence k 0.25 k \geq 0.25 .

Calvin Lin Staff - 7 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

oh yes.. my bad.. we have to find maximum.. :D sorry! but can u give out the steps to get the answer? please.?

Nisarg Thakkar - 7 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Nisarg Thakkar Calvin replied above that his key was to use Lagrange multipliers... yeah it's going to be a while till someone figures out a method from that.

Jared Low - 7 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Jared Low yea.. when i was in my school, my teacher mentioned it a couple of times. But i dont remember it now.. true, we have to wait..

Nisarg Thakkar - 7 years, 1 month ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...