The Case Of The Dropped Pawn

Logic Level 2

A white pawn had been accidentally knocked off the board. Neither player could remember for sure on which square it stood. If neither king has yet moved, where is the pawn?


This problem was inspired by the book Chess Mysteries of Sherlock Holmes by Raymond Smullyan.
This problem is the first one of the set Retrograde Chess .
b4 c3 d3 c4 c2 c7

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Black is missing one rook, which was captured by the pawn on h3. Since the Black king has not yet moved, how did the rook get out to be captured? Only by the pawns on b6 and c6 cross-capturing to let it out—i.e., the pawn on b6 came from c7 and the pawn on c6 came from b7.

Now, the Black rook could not get out until after the capture on c6, because as long as the pawn on c6 was on b7 the bishop on f5 was on c8 and confined the rook to the squares a8 and b8. Thus the capture on c6 was made first, then the rook got out, and then came the capture on b6.

White is missing a bishop and a rook (the missing White pawn should really be on the board, although we don't yet know where). The missing White bishop traveled on black squares, hence was captured on b6. So the missing White rook was captured on c6. Thus the White rook was captured before the Black rook got out to be captured on h3, and therefore before the White pawn (coming from g2) made its capture on h3. But before the capture on h3, how could the White rook have gotten out since the White king has never moved?

The only answer is that the White rook now on a1 is really the King's rook, and hence it was the White queen's rook which got captured on c6!

The sequence was this: First the White queen's rook got captured on c6. Then the Black rook got out and got captured on h3. Then the rook from h1 got out and came around to a1. We now see that it was the White queen's rook that was captured on c6, and we recall that the White king has never moved. Therefore the White pawn we are trying to locate cannot be on c2, since if it were, the White queen's rook could never have gotten out to be captured. Nor can it be on c3, since a cross-capture of this pawn and the one on b3 is not possible, because the only missing Black piece has been captured on h3. However, the White pawn we are trying to place must be on the c-file, because it was originally from c2, and had no Black pieces to capture to get onto a different file. Therefore it must be on either c4 or c7. It can't be on c7 because the Black pawn on c6 was there before the pawn on b6, hence there was always a Black pawn on c6 or c7, and the White pawn could never get around them. Thus the White pawn must stand on c4.

If the pawn is on c4, there is no way for the black bishop to get to f5 .... ???

Brian O'Sullivan - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

I don't understand your question.

Mateo Matijasevick - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

The black bishop on f5 must have started on c8. I cannot see how it can get to f5 as there is no path for it to get there.

Per your solution, "First the White Queenside rook got captured on c6. Then the Black rook got out and got captured on h3." This seems impossible to me, considering the position of the bishop on f5.

(1) Per your final solution, the missing white pawn is on c4, but how long has it been there? In order for the White Queenside rook to get up the board to be captured (per above), this pawn must have been already on c4 as the rook cannot get out if it is on c3 or c2.

Conclusion (1): We can therefore say that the missing white pawn is on c4 BEFORE the white Queenside rook is captured (via... bxc6), and that pawn has NOT MOVED since.. per the solution to the puzzle.

(2) In order for White's Queenside rook to move out in order to be captured, b3 must also be played, to enable the bishop on c1 to move out as it is otherwise blocking the rook.

Conclusion (2): We can therefore say that the pawn is on b3 BEFORE the rook is captured (via... bxc6), and that pawn has NOT MOVED since.

(3) The bishop currently on f5 cannot have moved out from c8 until the rook was captured via bxc6, as otherwise there is no way out.

Conclusion (3) We can therefore say that there is a black pawn on c6 before the black bishop moves from c8 and that pawn has NOT MOVED since.

Combining (1), (2) and (3) we can say there is no path for the bishop to get from c8 to f5... We can say this because:

There is a black pawn on d7 which has not moved. There is a black pawn on c6 (from (3) above), which has not moved. There is a white pawn on c4 (from (1) above), which has not moved. There is a white pawn on b3 (from (2) above), which has not moved.

With these 4 squares constantly occupied, there is no path for a bishop to get from c8 to f5.

Let me know what you think ??

Credit for this goes to a friend of mine - I had not spotted this.

Brian O'Sullivan - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Brian O'Sullivan In the diagram as I see it, the bishop is still on c8. There is no piece on f5.

Perhaps this diagram has been corrected, since the author of the problem refers to a bishop on f5 as well.

If the bishop were on f5, then your point would be valid, I believe.

I also think this is harder than a level 2 problem. I found it fairly challenging. And enjoyable.

Steven Perkins - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Steven Perkins I realized what Brian noted about the bishop while posting the problem, so I edited Raymond's problem... It's incredible that Mr. Smullyan didn't note that.

Yeah, I think the same, at least level 3. Have you read those books?

P.S.: Do you think Karjakin will win against Carlsen?

Mateo Matijasevick - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Mateo Matijasevick I have not read his books, but other puzzle books I have include some of his problems. Many are definitely head-scratchers for me. Quite challenging.

I believe Karjakin will win a game (or perhaps a few), but Carlsen is quite talented (obviously) and has experience in world championship competitions. It's not likely that Karjakin will prevail in this one. But perhaps someday.

Steven Perkins - 5 years, 1 month ago

it never did

Austin Li - 12 months ago

I love this question omg help I'm dying of extreme laughing

Bryan Hung - 4 years, 10 months ago

I am so confused

lee feiling - 2 years, 5 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...