True or False?
For positive reals a , b , and c , if 3 a b c = a 3 + b 3 + c 3 , then it is necessarily true that a = b = c .
Note
: One can interpret this geometrically. Consider a cuboid with side lengths
a
,
b
,
c
,
and three cubes with respective side lengths
a
,
b
,
c
.
If the sum of the volumes of the cubes is the same as three times the volume of the cuboid, then is the cuboid necessarily a cube?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Note this problem has an strong link to the second Intermediate problem from last week asking about solutions to a 2 + b 2 = a b .
It's possible to solve last week's problem with a method very similar to the one here; the difference is we can get a 2 + b 2 > a b for positive a and b meaning the only solutions in such a case are a = b = 0 .
Also note that through the AM-GM inequality , we also have the generalization: i = 1 ∑ n a i n ≥ n i = 1 ∏ n a i , for all a i ≥ 0 with equality if and only if all a i are equal.
We start by translating the given relation "The sum of the volumes of the cubes is three times the volume of the cuboid" into the following mathematical equation.
a 3 + b 3 + c 3 = 3 a b c
Now, a 3 + b 3 + c 3 = 3 a b c
⟹ a 3 + b 3 + c 3 − 3 a b c = 0
⟹ ( a + b ) 3 − 3 a b ( a + b ) + c 3 − 3 a b c = 0
⟹ ( a + b ) 3 + c 3 − 3 a b ( a + b ) − 3 a b c = 0
⟹ ( a + b + c ) { ( a + b ) 2 − ( a + b ) c + c 2 } − 3 a b ( a + b + c ) = 0
⟹ ( a + b + c ) ( a 2 + 2 a b + b 2 − c a − b c + c 2 − 3 a b ) = 0
⟹ a 2 + b 2 + c 2 − a b − b c − c a = 0 [As a + b + c = 0 ]
⟹ 2 a 2 + 2 b 2 + 2 c 2 − 2 a b − 2 a c − 2 c a = 0
⟹ ( a − b ) 2 + ( b − c ) 2 + ( c − a ) 2 = 0
⟹ ( a − b ) 2 = ( b − c ) 2 = ( c − a ) 2 = 0
⟹ a − b = b − c = c − a = 0
⟹ a = b = c .
So, Yes , Babu's cuboid is necessarily a cube.
Hey could you prove that "the sum of the volumes of the cube is three times the volume of the cuboid" ?
Log in to reply
It's the premise.
Log in to reply
Could you elaborate ?
Log in to reply
@Aman Thegreat – It's given.
Log in to reply
@Muhammad Rasel Parvej – Yes, I know that, but still can you prove it? Just curious how that formula was derived.
Log in to reply
@Aman Thegreat – It's not a general formula. It's a relation between Babu's cuboid and his cubes.
Why is a+b+c unequal to 0
Log in to reply
Geometrically, a 'cuboid' with the sum of its length ( a ) , breadth ( b ) and height ( c ) is zero is not a cuboid; it's a point.
Log in to reply
but the main question does not state that its just a hint
Log in to reply
@Saksham Jain – Even if you consider a + b + c = 0 , it again implies that a = b = c = 0
Log in to reply
@Vighnesh Raut – yes,if we are considering note,but according to main text they are reals so this is possible without a = b = c
Its is not a point either. It is just a void.
How did you factor out (a+b+c) from the first 2 terms in line 3?
a^3+b^3+c^3-3abc = (a+b+c)(a^2+b^2+c^2-bc-ca-ab) = 0, The first bracket cannot be zero as a, b and c are positive. The second bracket = {(b-c)^2+(c-a)^2+(a-b)^2}/2, which is zero only if a=b=c
Can't we directly say that it is right considering the fact that a3+b3+c3=3abc only when a=b=c So the cuboid has to be cube in the first place?
Log in to reply
How is it that intuitive?
We don't have this statement to go by. It is the statement we are trying to prove or disprove.
This can be shown by a visual proof of the first octant, where a , b , c are coordinates x , y , z .
f ( x , y , z ) = x 3 + y 3 + z 3 is concave with respect to the origin; the farthest euclidean distance from the origin on a level surface f ( x , y , z ) = k is achieved when x = y = z .
g ( x , y , z ) = 3 x y z is convex with respect to the origin; the closest euclidean distance to the origin on a level surface g ( x , y , z ) = k is achieved when x = y = z .
Thus for the point ( x , y , z ) , if x = y = z , the level surfaces of f and g containing that point would have the same k value, so k = f ( x , y , z ) = g ( x , y , z ) .
But if x = y = z were not true, the point ( x , y , z ) would be on different level surfaces of f and g , meaning f ( x , y , z ) = g ( x , y , z ) .
( a + b + c ) 3 = 3 ( a 2 + b 2 + c 2 ) ( a + b + c ) + 6 a b c − 2 ( a 3 + b 3 + c 3 ) ; with the given assumption, the last two terms cancel; divide out a + b + c to obtain ( a + b + c ) 2 = 3 ( a 2 + b 2 + c 2 ) . Expand the left-hand side and reduce to a b + b c + a c = a 2 + b 2 + c 2 . This can be further reduced to ( c − a ) ( b − a ) + ( c − b ) 2 = 0 . We are free to rearrange so that a ≤ b ≤ c , making the two terms on the left non-negative. But then both ( c − a ) ( b − a ) and ( c − b ) 2 must be zero; thus { c − b = 0 either c − a = 0 or b − a = 0 , showing that a = b = c .
The intention in the last step is clear, but shouldn't it read a ≤ b ≤ c ?
Ordering a, b, c so c>=b>=a:
Let j=b-a>=0, k=c-a>=0
3abc =3a(a+j)(a+k) =3(a^3+ja^2+ka^2+ajk)
a^3+b^3+c^3 =a^3+(a+j)^3+(a+k)^3 =3a^3+3ja^2+3aj^2+j^3+3ka^2+3ak^2+k^3
a>0 so j=k=0 so a=b=c
If 3 a b c = a 3 + b 3 + c 3 and if a = x , then x 3 − 3 b c x + b 3 + c 3 = 0 . Then graphically, all solutions for a positive real number a = x would include all positive real x-intercepts of y = x 3 − 3 b c x + b 3 + c 3 , where b > 0 and c > 0 .
The local maximum and minimum points of y = x 3 − 3 b c x + b 3 + c 3 would be when y ’ = 3 x 2 − 3 b c = 0 , or at x = ± b c . Testing x = − 2 b c , x = 0 , and x = 2 b c shows that this graph has a local maximum at x = − b c and a local minimum at x = b c . The local maximum height is therefore
y = ( − b c ) 3 − 3 b c ( − b c ) + b 3 + c 3
y = − b c b c + 3 b c b c + b 3 + c 3
y = 2 b c b c + b 3 + c 3
y = b 3 + 2 b c b c + c 3
y = ( b b ) 2 + 2 ( b b ) ( c c ) + ( c c ) 2
y = ( b b + c c ) 2
which is necessarily positive if b and c are real numbers.
Similarly, the local minimum height is
y = ( b c ) 3 − 3 b c ( b c ) + b 3 + c 3
y = b c b c − 3 b c b c + b 3 + c 3
y = − 2 b c b c + b 3 + c 3
y = b 3 − 2 b c b c + c 3
y = ( b b ) 2 − 2 ( b b ) ( c c ) + ( c c ) 2
y = ( b b − c c ) 2
which is either 0 if b b − c c = 0 or otherwise positive. If the local minimum height is positive, then for x > 0 the graph’s height decreases to a positive local minimum height and then increases, which means there are no positive x-intercepts, or no positive real solutions for a . If the local minimum height is 0 , then for x > 0 the graph’s height decreases to a local minimum height of 0 and then increases, which means there is one positive x-intercept at the local minimum of ( b c , b b − c c ) , where b b − c c = 0 . Solving this gives b = c , and if b = c then x = a = b c = b = c . Since this is the only possible positive real x-intercept, it is necessarily true that a = b = c .
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
The relation can be written as
3 a 3 + b 3 + c 3 = a b c .
However, by the AM-GM inequality, we have
3 a 3 + b 3 + c 3 ≥ 3 a 3 b 3 c 3 = a b c .
Note that a , b , c are positive real numbers due to them being the side lengths of cubes, so AM-GM can be applied here.
Since we have equality, the side lengths must satisfy the equality conditions of AM-GM, meaning that a 3 = b 3 = c 3 , or a = b = c . Thus, it is true that Babu’s cuboid is necessarily a cube because its side lengths are all the same.