( x , y , z ) → ( 0 , 0 , 0 ) lim x 2 + y 2 + z 2 e − x 2 − y 2 − z 2 − 1 = ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
You are the master of the one-line solution. :)
I think that a first, and more interesting step is proving that the limit exist. Or trying to find the value of the limit by definition.... What do you think about??
Log in to reply
I'm showing that the limit exists by showing that it is the derivative of e − t at t = 0 .
Log in to reply
And how do you know you can make the substitution? Because when a limit doesn't exist there are substitutions that give you different results.
Log in to reply
@Hjalmar Orellana Soto – Can you give us an example of that: A substitution giving a different result?
Log in to reply
@Otto Bretscher – For this limit there is no one, because the limit exists, that's why I say that we should prove that the limit exist before the substitution, because substitutions are paths to approach to the value of the limit, aren't they?
Log in to reply
@Hjalmar Orellana Soto – Not if properly done; a substitution is just a relabeling. Could you give us an example where a limit fails to exist but a substitution gives a "false positive"; I don't quite see what you mean.
Log in to reply
@Otto Bretscher – l i m ( x , y ) → ( 0 , 0 ) x x + y we can take the path y = m x ∀ m ∈ R and the limit becomes lim ( x , m x ) → ( 0 , 0 ) x x 1 + m = m + 1 giving infinite values for the limit... Are we talking about the same thing?
Log in to reply
@Hjalmar Orellana Soto – Oh, now I get it. Well, a path is not a substitution. Letting t = x 2 + y 2 + z 2 , we cover all possible values of x 2 + y 2 + z 2 ... that is required of a substitution.
Log in to reply
@Otto Bretscher – Yeah, you're right, thank you .)
Applying spherical coordinates, let x = r sin ( θ ) cos ( ϕ ) , y = r sin ( θ ) sin ( ϕ ) , z = r cos ( θ ) , where r ∈ ( 0 , ∞ ) , θ ∈ [ 0 , π ] , ϕ ∈ [ 0 , 2 π ) . Then x 2 + y 2 + z 2 = r 2 , and the three-variable limit is transformed into a one-variable limit to which L'Hopital's rule can be applied as follows:
r → 0 lim r 2 e − r 2 − 1 = r → 0 lim 2 r − 2 r e − r 2 = r → 0 lim − e − r 2 = − 1 .
Ha ha, yes, did the same way you did! :)
How do I add a solution ..independently.....
Log in to reply
If you answered correctly then you should be allowed to post your own solution. There should be a box at the top of this solution section that says something like "Post your solution here".
Log in to reply
This is only true on the full website, not the app
Substituting x 2 + y 2 + z 2 = u , we notice that as ( x , y , z ) → ( 0 , 0 , 0 ) , u → 0
Next, we transform the limit to read lim u → 0 u e − u − 1
Since the value of the numerator and denominator at u = 0 is 0 , we can apply l'Hôpital's Rule
lim u → 0 u e − u − 1 = lim u → 0 d u d u d u d ( e − u − 1 ) = lim u → 0 1 − e − u = lim u → 0 − e − u = − ( e 0 ) = − ( 1 ) = − 1
The fastest would be to consider the series expansion for e x . :-)
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Relevant wiki: Derivative by First Principle
My solution is similar to Brian's:
Substitute x 2 + y 2 + z 2 = t and note that lim t → 0 + t e − t − 1 = − 1 , the derivative of e − t at t = 0 .