2 1 1 0 0 − 1 2 1 0 0
Is this result divisible by 1 1 ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Far nicer than my way. I made the mistake of taking the 3 1 0 0 out of both, meaning that I had to go through the 10-long cycle for 7 n to repeat and the 5-cycle for 4 n to repeat. I saw your way after and realised how I'd made life difficult for myself.
What can I say? Brilliant!
I don't understand the jump from the main explanation (very good indeed) to the ending sentence: "as long as the exponent on 21 is even, the difference will always be divisible by 11. For example 21^6-12^7, is divisible by 11."
Log in to reply
21^p is congruent to: (-1)^p mod 11. Hence, if p is positive then 21^p = 1 mod 11. If p is negative then 21^p = -1 mod 11. 12^a is congruent to (1)^a mod 11. Hence if a is either positive or negative 12^a = 1 mod 11. Finally, take the subtraction of 21^p - 12^a mod 11. Then when p is positive we have: 1 - 1 = 0 mod 11. If p is negative then: -1 - 1 = -2 mod 11. Only positive p works.
EDIT: I made a mistake here. I mean positive to be even and negative to be odd. Not sure why I wrote this but this was pointed out by Felix Perez.
This is what I meant: 21^p is congruent to: (-1)^p mod 11. Hence, if p is even then 21^p = 1 mod 11. If p is odd then 21^p = -1 mod 11. 12^a is congruent to (1)^a mod 11. Hence if a is either even or odd 12^a = 1 mod 11. Finally, take the subtraction of 21^p - 12^a mod 11. Then when p is even we have: 1 - 1 = 0 mod 11. If p is odd then: -1 - 1 = -2 mod 11. Only even p works.
Log in to reply
Thank you very much for the explanation.
But, when you say "positive p"... are you meaning "(p is) even" and when you say "negative p" you mean "(p is) odd"??? Only if so, it makes sense to me.
Log in to reply
@Félix Pérez Haoñie – no its wrong don't listen to him
Log in to reply
@Ashton Parker – He has edited his original answer. My following comment doesn't sound now as coherent.
Log in to reply
@Félix Pérez Haoñie – I did edit it. Anyone reading it would have realized i edited it to correct for what you said. I can edit it back. No worries I will. This is what I meant: 21^p is congruent to: (-1)^p mod 11. Hence, if p is even then 21^p = 1 mod 11. If p is odd then 21^p = -1 mod 11. 12^a is congruent to (1)^a mod 11. Hence if a is either even or odd 12^a = 1 mod 11. Finally, take the subtraction of 21^p - 12^a mod 11. Then when p is even we have: 1 - 1 = 0 mod 11. If p is odd then: -1 - 1 = -2 mod 11. Only even p works.
Log in to reply
@Mo H – OK, I've seen your explanation including the wrong version and the right one. Thanks. Not checked it all the way, though. Sorry, lack of time.
Correct Because a Ξ b [n] is equivalent with n/(a-b) So 11/(21^100-12^100)
100 is a multiple of 10 = phi(11)(phi is eulero totien function). In general a^100-b^100 divide 11 with a and b relative prime with 11,
Just for fun, here's a solution that relies on the fact that a − b ∣ a k − b k :
2 1 1 0 0 − 1 2 1 0 0 = ( 2 1 2 ) 5 0 − ( 1 2 2 ) 5 0 = ( 2 1 2 − 1 2 2 ) ( d ) = ( 2 1 + 1 2 ) ( 2 1 − 1 2 ) ( d ) = 1 1 ( 3 ) ( 9 ) ( d ) ,
where d is some expression that evaluates to a positive integer. We conclude that yes , 2 1 1 0 0 − 1 2 1 0 0 is divisible by 11.
Is there a name for that fact you mentioned on the first line? It seems to me to be true but can you provide a proof or theorem name? Just for my curiosity
Log in to reply
some proofs: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/712758/derivation-of-factorization-of-an-bn
One quick proof is to consider the polynomial f ( a ) = a k − b k , where b , k are fixed positive integers. Obviously, a = b is a root of the polynomial, so a − b is a factor of f , giving us a − b ∣ a k − b k .
A stupid question, but when I divide and multiply the expression (question itself )with 11 and break down 21 and 12 into it's prime factors ...how come when none of the factors of 21 or 12 are divisible by 11, the expression is still divisible by 11? What am I missing here?
Using binomial expansion, 2 1 1 0 0 = ( 2 2 − 1 ) 1 0 0 = 2 2 1 0 0 + 1 0 0 ⋅ 2 2 9 9 ⋅ ( − 1 ) 1 + ⋯ + ( k 1 0 0 ) 2 2 k ( − 1 ) 1 0 0 − k + ⋯ + 1 0 0 ⋅ 2 2 1 ⋅ ( − 1 ) 9 9 + ( − 1 ) 1 0 0 , and 1 2 1 0 0 = ( 1 1 + 1 ) 1 0 0 = 1 1 1 0 0 + 1 0 0 ⋅ 1 1 9 9 ⋅ ( + 1 ) 1 + ⋯ + ( k 1 0 0 ) 1 1 k ( + 1 ) 1 0 0 − k + ⋯ + 1 0 0 ⋅ 1 1 1 ⋅ ( + 1 ) 9 9 + ( + 1 ) 1 0 0 . Each term in these expansions is a multiple of 11, except for the last term of each expression, which is 1.
Since we subtract two numbers that are one more than a multiple of 11, 2 1 1 0 0 − 1 2 1 0 0 is a multiple of 11.
Lovely solution. Thank you.
Admittedly, this solution is essentially equal to working "modulo 11": 2 1 1 0 0 ≡ ( − 1 ) 1 0 0 ≡ 1 and 1 2 1 0 0 ≡ 1 1 0 0 ≡ 1 lead to the conclusion 2 1 1 0 0 − 1 2 1 0 0 ≡ 1 − 1 ≡ 0 mod 11.
I posted the explicit binomial solution for those who are not acquainted with modular arithmetic. The "multiple of 11" argument does precisely the same job.
I can't give you an upvote (I don't know why the button doesn't react to my click) but I like your solution.
In this solution I have used some basic properties of Modular Arithematic.
( 2 1 1 0 0 − 1 2 1 0 0 ) m o d ( 1 1 ) ≡ [ 2 1 1 0 0 m o d ( 1 1 ) ] − [ 1 2 1 0 0 m o d ( 1 1 ) ]
2 1 1 0 0 ≡ ( 2 2 − 1 ) 1 0 0 ≡ ( − 1 ) 1 0 0 ≡ 1 m o d ( 1 1 )
1 2 1 0 0 ≡ ( 1 1 + 1 ) 1 0 0 ≡ ( 1 ) 1 0 0 ≡ 1 m o d ( 1 1 )
Therefore ( 2 1 1 0 0 − 1 2 1 0 0 ) m o d ( 1 1 ) ≡ [ 2 1 1 0 0 m o d ( 1 1 ) ] − [ 1 2 1 0 0 m o d ( 1 1 ) ] ≡ ( 1 − 1 ) m o d ( 1 1 ) ≡ 0 m o d 1 1
So the answer is 'Yes'.
2 1 1 0 0 − 1 2 1 0 0 = 3 1 0 0 ( 7 1 0 0 − 4 1 0 0 ) = 3 1 0 0 ( 7 5 0 − 4 5 0 ) ( 7 5 0 + 4 5 0 ) = 3 1 0 0 ( 7 5 0 − 4 5 0 ) ( 7 + 4 ) ( 7 4 9 − 7 4 8 4 1 + 7 4 7 4 2 − . . . + 4 4 9 ) 7 + 4 = 1 1 , so the given number is divisible by 11
50 square is 250,the powers on 7 and 4 are wrong!!!!
Slightly different from the other solutions I see here, but of the same ilk.
Straight factoring gives us: x 1 0 0 − y 1 0 0 = ( x 5 0 − y 5 0 ) ( x 5 0 + y 5 0 )
Likewise, x 5 0 − y 5 0 = ( x 2 5 − y 2 5 ) ( x 2 5 + y 2 5 )
Then, x 2 5 + y 2 5 = ( x 5 + y 5 ) ( x 2 0 − x 1 5 y 5 + x 1 0 y 1 0 − x 5 y 1 5 + y 2 0 )
Finally,
x 5 + y 5 = ( x + y ) ( x 4 − x 3 y + x 2 y 2 − x y 3 + y 4 )
In conclusion, ( x + y ) ∣ ( x 1 0 0 − y 1 0 0 ) .
Specifically, 1 1 ∣ 3 3 ∣ ( 2 1 1 0 0 − 1 2 1 0 0 ) .
I noticed an interesting relationship using this factorisation approach.
x^n + (11-x)^n is divisible by 11 if n is odd. x^n - (11-x)^n divides 11 if n is even.
I did an immediate factorization after line 1 as follows: x^50 + y^50 = (x+y)*(x^49 - x^48y +x^47y^2 - .... y^49) which means that whatever all the other factors are there will be a multiplication by x+y =33 which is a multiple of 11.
2 1 1 0 0 − 1 2 1 0 0 = ( 1 1 + 1 0 ) 1 0 0 − ( 1 1 + 1 ) 1 0 0 If we expand the R.H.S, only term that doesn’t inlude ’11’ is " 1 0 1 0 0 − 1 1 0 0 " 1 0 2 n − 1 is divisible by 11 ∀ n > 1
I may be wrong, but here goes: 21 x 12 = 252 and 252 is divisible by 12 therefore raising 21 and 12 by power 100 and subtracting the results would also be divisible by 12. That is why I marked the YES option, and lo and behold it was correct, it surprised me so I have shared my take,but please don't make fun.
(A^n-B^n) is always divisible by A-B and divisible by A+B if n is even. So the given expression is divisible by 21+12=33, which is divisible by 11. Keep solving :)
2 1 1 0 0 − 1 2 1 0 0 = 3 1 0 0 ( 7 1 0 0 − 4 1 0 0 )
3 1 0 0 ( 7 1 0 0 − 4 1 0 0 ) = 3 1 0 0 ( 7 5 0 + 4 5 0 ) ( 7 5 0 − 4 5 0 )
3 1 0 0 ( 7 5 0 + 4 5 0 ) ( 7 5 0 − 4 5 0 ) = 3 1 0 0 × 1 1 5 0 × 3 5 0
3 1 0 0 × 1 1 5 0 × 3 5 0 = 3 1 5 0 × 1 1 5 0
So yes, the result is divisible by 110.
Since a^n - b^n is divisible by (a+b) when n is even, (21^100 - 12^100) is divisible by 21 + 12 = 33, and thus by 11.
Challenge: Is 5555^2222 + 2222^5555 divisible by 7?
No it won't be divisible by 7
Yes, it is.
3^100(7^100-4^100)=21^100-12^100. For every other integer greater than zero, 7^n-4^n is divisible by 11. 100mod(2)=0, so (7^100-4^100) is divisible by 11, and 21^100-12^100 is divisible by 11.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
If you are unfamiliar with modular arithmetic or congruence , then:
2 1 1 2 ≡ − 1 ( m o d 1 1 ) ≡ 1 ( m o d 1 1 )
You can raise each side of a congruence to the same exponent, and the congruence still holds .
2 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 ≡ ( − 1 ) 1 0 0 ( m o d 1 1 ) ≡ 1 ( m o d 1 1 ) ≡ 1 1 0 0 ( m o d 1 1 ) ≡ 1 ( m o d 1 1 )
We can substitute just like with equations:
2 1 1 0 0 − 1 2 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 − 1 2 1 0 0 ≡ 1 − 1 ( m o d 1 1 ) ≡ 0 ( m o d 1 1 )
Using the definition of congruence, we can interpret this as 2 1 1 0 0 − 1 2 1 0 0 is divisible by 11. In fact, as long as the exponent on 21 is even, the difference will always be divisible by 11. For example, 2 1 6 − 1 2 7 is divisible by 11.