Which of the following has the largest value?
(1) 1 2 3 9 8 7
(2) 2 3 4 8 7 6
(3) 3 4 5 7 6 5
(4) 4 5 6 6 5 4
(5) 5 6 7 5 4 3
(6) 6 7 8 4 3 2
(7) 7 8 9 3 2 1
This is Part 3 of 3 of the set Triple Powers , here is Part I and Part II .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Excellent solution, very complete and use of calculator is very limited. Well Done :)
( a ) 1 2 3 8 7 6 9 8 7 = 2 2 6 < 2 3 4 ⟹ ( 2 ) > ( 1 ) ( b ) 2 3 4 7 6 5 8 7 6 = 5 2 0 > 3 4 5 ⟹ ( 2 ) > ( 3 ) ( c ) 2 3 4 6 5 4 8 7 6 = 1 4 9 0 > 4 5 6 ⟹ ( 2 ) > ( 4 ) ( d ) 2 3 4 5 4 3 8 7 6 = 6 6 3 9 > 5 6 7 ⟹ ( 2 ) > ( 5 ) ( e ) 2 3 4 7 6 5 8 7 6 = 6 3 7 1 5 > 6 7 8 ⟹ ( 2 ) > ( 6 ) ( f ) 2 3 4 7 6 5 8 7 6 = 2 9 2 0 9 4 6 > 7 8 9 ⟹ ( 2 ) > ( 7 ) 2 3 4 8 7 6 e . g . 2 3 4 6 5 4 8 7 6 = 1 4 9 0 i s t e r m e d a s a r a t i o . For ratios, only integers are used since this is sufficient. Short cut:- Compare (3) and (4) with step (b) above. Exponent of (4) is less than that of (3) and in (c) the rartio we get is 520>456 the base of (4), so (4)<(2). Similarly, in (d) ratio 6639> bases of (6) and (7) and their exponents are less than 543 used in (d).Hence (6) and (7) are less than (2). SO only steps (a),(b) and (d) are sufficient.
Without calculator how can you do these calculations
Good solution, though can you clarify why you are taking a root, for example in the first line why are you doing the 876th root of (1) and how did you get the inequality? It's a little choppy and unclear overall, but good solution.
Log in to reply
A m B n ? I f A n m > B t h e n A m = ( A n m ) n > B n . S a y 4 4 9 2 ? ⟹ 4 2 4 = 1 6 > 9 t h e n 4 4 > 9 2 . Hope it is clear.
Log in to reply
Much clearer now, Thank you. And excellent solution overall.
Log in to reply
@Stewart Feasby – I thought we couldn't use a calculator? It's not like those equalities were exact.
Log in to reply
@Akiva Weinberger – The question never specified whether you could or could not use a calculator. Ideally most people will try to do this without a calculator (which is not that bad simply using logarithms), but some will use a calculator to help them. It's completely your choice unless the question says not to use one.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
The following proof is more analytic and reduces the number of times you have to use the calculator. Let us introduce the function f ( x ) = x 1 1 1 0 − x where 0 < x < 1 1 1 0 . What we have to find is the largest of the values f ( 1 2 3 ) , f ( 2 3 4 ) , . . . , f ( 7 8 9 ) . We claim that the largest of these values is f ( 2 3 4 ) = 2 3 4 8 7 6 . The proof of our claim can be reduced to verify that f ( x ) is decreasing for x ≥ 2 3 4 and f ( 1 2 3 ) < f ( 2 3 4 ) . The inequality is very easy to check by comparing the natural logarithms of the two numbers. To prove that f ( x ) is decreasing on the given interval is equivalent to prove that g ( x ) = ln f ( x ) = ( 1 1 1 0 − x ) ln x is decreasing on the interval. This can be obtained by showing that g ′ ( x ) = x 1 1 1 0 − 1 − ln ( x ) is negative for x ≥ 2 3 4 and this follows from the fact that g ′ ′ ( x ) = − x x + 1 1 1 0 < 0 for any x ≥ 2 3 4 and g ′ ( 2 3 4 ) ≈ − 1 . 7 1 < 0 .