The Professor

Algebra Level 2

E l i j a h L \large \color{#D61F06}{Elijah \ L} was a Math Professor who was trying figure out the answer to this problem. He was a smart person, probably one of the most BRILLIANT minds to ever exist, but he needed help for this one problem, so please help him -

2 x < x 4 3 x + 8 2x < x - 4 \leq 3x + 8

Find the sum of all the integer values that satisfy this inequality.


The answer is -11.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

Elijah L
Jul 28, 2020

Haha jokes on you, I managed to solve the problem. Here's a (slightly) more algebraic approach:

We can simplify the compound inequality as follows:

2 x < x 4 3 x + 8 x + 4 < 0 2 x + 12 \begin{aligned} 2x&<x-4&\le 3x+8\\ x+4&<0&\le 2x+12 \end{aligned}

For this to be true, we must have x + 4 < 0 x+4 < 0 and 2 x + 12 0 2x + 12 \ge 0 . The answer must be the union of x < 4 x < -4 and x 6 x \ge -6 , or 6 x < 4 -6 \le x < -4 . The only integer solutions to this inequality are 5 -5 and 6 -6 , and the sum of the two is 11 \boxed{-11} .

Thanks again for the featured problem, and the Mathathon 2020! It was a lot of fun!

Glad you like it! \checkmark

A Former Brilliant Member - 10 months, 2 weeks ago

As seen from the graph, the only integer values that satisfy this equation are 5 a n d 6 -5 \ and \ -6

5 + 6 = 11 -5 + -6 = \textsf{\boxed{-11}}

Log in to reply

@Percy Jackson , you missed the

]

in the ending of your mention, it is essential...

Frisk Dreemurr - 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

i don't care, he got the mention and i told you to stop mentioning me, its getting annoying...............

A Former Brilliant Member - 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@A Former Brilliant Member I tried to help, okay then...

Frisk Dreemurr - 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Congrats Elijah!

A Former Brilliant Member - 10 months, 2 weeks ago

how many daggers would you rate this

NSCS 747 - 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

2 daggers, small but pointy :)

A Former Brilliant Member - 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Small but Pointy \Large \text{Small but Pointy}\ \Huge \color{grey} \dagger \dagger

NSCS 747 - 10 months, 2 weeks ago

@Frisk Dreemurr - Did you mention me?

A Former Brilliant Member - 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

Yeah, to get your reference number

Frisk Dreemurr - 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Small but Pointy ††

SRIJAN Singh - 8 months, 4 weeks ago

Log in to reply

use latex copy and pste make it tiny

NSCS 747 - 8 months, 4 weeks ago

Log in to reply

lol,smart guess btw in which grade are you?

SRIJAN Singh - 8 months, 4 weeks ago
Zakir Husain
Jul 28, 2020

2 x < x 4 3 x + 8 2x<x-4\leq3x+8 2 x < x 4 x 4 3 x + 8 \Rightarrow 2x<x-4\quad x-4\leq3x+8 x < 4 x 6 \therefore x<-4\quad x\geq-6 As x x is also an integer x { 5 , 6 , 7... } { 6 , 5 , 4... } = { 5 , 6 } \therefore x\in \{-5,-6,-7...\}\cap\{-6,-5,-4...\}=\{-5,-6\} 5 6 = 11 -5-6=\boxed{-11}

The use of set notation confuses me.

Yajat Shamji - 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

It is very simple in Zakir's solution, @Yajat Shamji . After solving the inequality, you get x < 4 a n d x 6 x < 4 \ and \ x \geq -6 .

So x x is inside the set of all numbers less than 4 4 and the set of all numbers greater than or equal to 6 6 . The common numbers in both these sets are only 5 -5 and 6 -6 , hence the answer 11 -11 . Did you understand it?

A Former Brilliant Member - 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

Now I get it! It's just, in Years 9 11 9-11 , we only learn two symbols of set notation: intersection and union, that's it.

Yajat Shamji - 10 months, 2 weeks ago

Log in to reply

@Yajat Shamji Oh, ok. I learnt the complete set notation in 8th :)

A Former Brilliant Member - 10 months, 2 weeks ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...