The unending streak of circles and sticks

A large number of sticks (with mass density ρ \rho per unit length) and circles (with radius R R ) lean on each other, as shown in the figure below.

Each stick makes an angle θ \theta with the horizontal and is tangent to a circle at its upper end. The sticks are hinged to the ground, and every other surface is friction less.

In the limit of a very large number of sticks and circles, what is the normal force between a stick and the circle it rests on, very far to the right? If you find result as S S give the as [ S ] [S] , where [.] represents the ceiling function.

Details and assumptions:

  • The last circle, i.e. the circle at infinity is leaning against a wall (which has only the significance of stopping the whole system from moving)
  • Take ρ = 1 , R = 15 , g = 10 m/s 2 , θ = 7 4 \rho = 1, R = 15, g = 10\text{ m/s}^2, \theta = 74^\circ .
  • Every value is given is S.I. system.

Hint: As always, generalize the result for any N N and then take the limit as N N tends to infinity .


The answer is 64.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

please zoom in if you find it small, thanks ! please zoom in if you find it small, thanks !

I don't know much about the physics of this, but I do have concerns about "Prove the result for finite N with a wall, and then assume that the infinite case is the limit of the finite case". There are several claims which are not true in the infinite case by taking the limit.

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

no sir, the question is exactly fine and it is the only thing needed for solving it as far as wall is concerned , i wrote in the question that it has only work of stopping the circles from moving and nothing else ! :) and the statement of taking limit was a hint as this is how we proceed in questions like this , we find for any "n" and then , if the limit converges,we find it , if it diverges , such physical position can't exist ! but in this case, since limit exists , this situation is obviously fine :) if you still do not believe me , we may hear sir @Josh Silverman

A Former Brilliant Member - 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

I don't have a problem with the approach. At some point, a circle at the near end shouldn't be able to feel a difference from the far (large N N ) end.

I would though highly discourage screenshot solutions.

Josh Silverman Staff - 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Josh Silverman Good to know. Thanks.

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 5 months ago

@Harsh Shrivastava you were demanding a problem , here it is ! have fun bro :)

A Former Brilliant Member - 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Had fun! Nice problem.

I am happy that I solved it.

Now my turn to post a problem!

Will post a problem soon(buzy this week due to inmo)

Harsh Shrivastava - 4 years, 5 months ago

From which book is this problem?

Harsh Shrivastava - 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

Its from David Morin!!!

A Former Brilliant Member - 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@A Former Brilliant Member Oh I see.thanks.

Harsh Shrivastava - 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Harsh Shrivastava Do you use this book?

A Former Brilliant Member - 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@A Former Brilliant Member No.But I have a PDF of it.

Harsh Shrivastava - 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@Harsh Shrivastava Its a nice book,but the main problem is answers to exercise questions are not avalaible.

A Former Brilliant Member - 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@A Former Brilliant Member do you hve doubt in ny excercise uestion, i my be of some help :)

A Former Brilliant Member - 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

@A Former Brilliant Member Do you have answers of all questions?

A Former Brilliant Member - 4 years, 5 months ago

@A Former Brilliant Member The problem is I don't have doubts but I just want to verify answers.

A Former Brilliant Member - 4 years, 5 months ago

Actually can you please help me,I have been solving the book by David morin,but the problems is where do I get the answers to the exercise questions?

A Former Brilliant Member - 4 years, 5 months ago

Very nice problem and well written solution !

A minor suggestion: when numerically evaluating N N_{\infty} , i find 63,48.

Do you agree ?

If so, could you specify in the problem that the result must be rounded up to the nearest integer ? Thank you

mat baluch - 4 years, 5 months ago

Log in to reply

oh , yes . i will write to give result as in ceiling function , i took theta as 4/5 .

A Former Brilliant Member - 4 years, 5 months ago
Laszlo Mihaly
Mar 30, 2018

You do not need to do the infinite series. Simply assume that N i = N i + 1 = N N_i=N_{i+1}=N and solve for N N . The torque equation for the rod is

N N m g 2 cos θ = 0 N \ell - N'\ell' -mg \frac{\ell}{2} \cos \theta = 0

Here = R cot θ / 2 \ell=R \cot \theta/2 , = R tan θ / 2 \ell'=R \tan \theta/2 and m = ρ m=\rho \ell . From the balance of forces for the ring we get:

N = N N=N'

Solving for N N yields:

N = ρ R G 2 cos θ / tan 2 θ / 2 cot θ / 2 tan θ / 2 = ρ R G 2 cos 3 θ / 2 sin θ / 2 = 63.48 N N=\frac{\rho R G}{2} \frac{\cos \theta/\tan^2\theta/2}{\cot\theta/2-\tan \theta/2}=\frac{\rho R G}{2} \frac{\cos^3\theta/2}{\sin\theta/2}=63.48N

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...