These are the only numbers that have this property!

Level 2

A certain property P P is shared by the numbers 0 , 1 , 512 , 4913 , 5832 , 0, 1, 512, 4913, 5832, and 17576 17576 .

This property only holds for one other whole number n n .

What is n n ?


Hint: It has probably got something to do with the sum of the digits.

(Disclaimer: this problem is not original.)


The answer is 19683.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Discussions for this problem are now closed

Pranjal Jain
Dec 9, 2014

It is clear from initial 3 numbers that first step is to check cube roots which come out to be 0 , 1 , 8 , 17 , 18 , 26 0,1,8,17,18,26

Now next step is to notice that sum of digits of respective cubes are the numbers itself

  • 0 3 = 0 0^{3}=0
  • 1 3 = 1 1^{3}=1
  • 8 3 = 512 , 5 + 1 + 2 = 8 8^{3}=512,\ 5+1+2=8
  • 1 7 3 = 4913 , 4 + 9 + 1 + 3 = 17 17^{3}=4913,\ 4+9+1+3=17
  • 1 8 3 = 5832 , 5 + 8 + 3 + 2 = 18 18^{3}=5832,\ 5+8+3+2=18
  • 2 6 3 = 17576 , 1 + 7 + 5 + 7 + 6 = 26 26^{3}=17576,\ 1+7+5+7+6=26

Now the remaining number is 27 2 7 3 = 19683 , 1 + 9 + 6 + 8 + 3 = 27 27^{3}=19683,\ 1+9+6+8+3=27

So our answer is 19683 \boxed{19683}

OEIS

@ArielGershon No need to provide the max limit of n as 1 0 10 10^{10} . These are the only numbers possible

Pranjal Jain - 6 years, 6 months ago

How do you know that this is all the possible numbers? That makes this question really interesting.

Calvin Lin Staff - 6 years, 6 months ago

http://hostilefork.com/2009/12/24/six-dudeney-numbers-proof/

I found this computer program on a blog that proves there are only 6 numbers. I cannot see any mathematical way of proving it.

Satyen Nabar - 6 years, 6 months ago

@Satyen Nabar If the cube root of n has x digits, the n has at most (3x) digits, sum of digits of n is at most 27x.

( 27 x ) 3 n 1 0 3 x 3 (27x)^{3} \geq n \geq 10^{3x-3}

This already gives a bound of at most 3 digits.

Joel Tan - 6 years, 6 months ago

@Joel Tan Right, and that is why the original version of "numbers up to 1 0 10 10 ^ {10} is almost immediately equivalent to the unbounded version.

This is one way that CS can be used to prove math theorems. First we find a (ridiculously) large bound, and then we check all cases with a computer.

Calvin Lin Staff - 6 years, 6 months ago

@Satyen Nabar Thanks for the link! Thats something nice to spend time upon!

Pranjal Jain - 6 years, 6 months ago

OEIS link says! Though it would be interesting to prove this!

Pranjal Jain - 6 years, 6 months ago

Yeah you're right, I'll take that part out. Good job solving it, by the way :)

Ariel Gershon - 6 years, 6 months ago

Dudeny Numbers !

Venkata Karthik Bandaru - 6 years, 2 months ago
Ashu Gupta
Dec 9, 2014

512=8^3 and 5+1+2=8 , and similar 4913=17^3 and 4+9+1+3=17 so next no is 19683=27^3 AND 1+9+6+8+3=27

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...