Odd and even consecutive sums

Algebra Level 1

1 + 3 + 5 + + 99 = 2500 2 + 4 + 6 + + 100 = ? \begin{aligned} 1 + 3 + 5 + \cdots + &99 = 2500\\ \\ 2 + 4 + 6 + \cdots + &100 =\ ? \end{aligned}

Hint: What is the difference between these 2 equations?


The answer is 2550.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

6 solutions

Genis Dude
Jul 18, 2017

1 + 3 + 5 ..... 99 = 2500 (eq1)

2 + 4 + 6 .....100 = x (eq2)

(Eq2) - (Eq1) gives

(2-1) + (4-3) + (6-5)....(100-99) = x - 2500

Therefore, 50(1) = x - 2500

So, x = 2550

P. A. de razao 2

Izidoro Elias - 3 years, 10 months ago
Mohammad Khaza
Jul 17, 2017

summation of (1+2+3+.......+100)= n ( n + 1 ) 2 \frac {n(n+1)}{2}

or, the summation is, = 100 ( 100 + 1 ) 2 \frac {100(100+1)}{2} = 5050 5050

now, (1+3+5+....99)=2500

so, (2+4+6+........100)= 5050 2500 5050 -2500 = 2550 2550

Sure, it's easy to evaluate 2+4+6+...+100 = 2(1+2+3+...+50) using the identity 1+2+3+...+n=n(n+1)/2, but is there a quicker approach? Especially since I've already given the first equation...

Pi Han Goh - 3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

i can't remember. if you know i will be very happy to learn.

Mohammad Khaza - 3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

Let 2+4+6+ ... + 100 = x

Can you evaluate " (2+4+6+... + 100) - (1 + 3 + ... + 99) "?

Pi Han Goh - 3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

@Pi Han Goh i think that's the way i solved too. you just removed the formula and the words.

Mohammad Khaza - 3 years, 10 months ago
Anuj Shikarkhane
Jul 17, 2017

It is interesting to observe that when we add these two equations, we are going to get the sum of numbers from 1 1 to 100 100 which is 100 × 101 2 = 5050 \dfrac{100\times101}{2}=5050 .

Now, as the question says to find 2 + 4 + 6 + + 100 2+4+6+\cdots +100 , we simply subtract the sum of 1 + 3 + 5 + + 99 1+3+5+\cdots+ 99 which is 2500 2500 (given) from 5050 5050 to obtain 2550 \boxed{2550} as our result.

Is it possible to solve this question without knowing that 1+2+...+n = n(n+1)/2 ?

Pi Han Goh - 3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

obviously. if you think.........1+the last number =2+ the 2nd last number=3+ the 3rd last number=.........

so, i will get some equal pairs . again,if it is odd then, at first calculate the digits without the last number and then add it.

Mohammad Khaza - 3 years, 10 months ago

The sequence of numbers is an arithmetic progression .

n = 100 2 = 50 n=\dfrac{100}{2}=50

S = 50 2 ( 2 + 100 ) = S=\dfrac{50}{2}(2+100)= 2550 \large \color{#D61F06}\boxed{2550}

If you didn't know the formula of an arithmetic progression sum, can you still evaluate the given expression?

Pi Han Goh - 3 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

Is it by subtracting first equation from second

genis dude - 3 years, 10 months ago
John Zawacki
Aug 13, 2017

The difference is 50

Yup, that's it. Is the first equation actually necessary to solve this question?

Pi Han Goh - 3 years, 10 months ago
Azadali Jivani
Jul 16, 2017

1+2+3+........+99 = 4950, but in Q. given is = 2500
So 1 is = 0.505050505051 & 100 is = 50.5050505051
Therefore 2+3+4+....................+100 = 2550 [ 2500 - 0.50505051 + 50.50505051 = 2550

the question has been fixed

Pi Han Goh - 3 years, 11 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...