1 + 3 + 5 + ⋯ + 2 + 4 + 6 + ⋯ + 9 9 = 2 5 0 0 1 0 0 = ?
Hint: What is the difference between these 2 equations?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
P. A. de razao 2
summation of (1+2+3+.......+100)= 2 n ( n + 1 )
or, the summation is, = 2 1 0 0 ( 1 0 0 + 1 ) = 5 0 5 0
now, (1+3+5+....99)=2500
so, (2+4+6+........100)= 5 0 5 0 − 2 5 0 0 = 2 5 5 0
Sure, it's easy to evaluate 2+4+6+...+100 = 2(1+2+3+...+50) using the identity 1+2+3+...+n=n(n+1)/2, but is there a quicker approach? Especially since I've already given the first equation...
Log in to reply
i can't remember. if you know i will be very happy to learn.
Log in to reply
Let 2+4+6+ ... + 100 = x
Can you evaluate " (2+4+6+... + 100) - (1 + 3 + ... + 99) "?
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – i think that's the way i solved too. you just removed the formula and the words.
It is interesting to observe that when we add these two equations, we are going to get the sum of numbers from 1 to 1 0 0 which is 2 1 0 0 × 1 0 1 = 5 0 5 0 .
Now, as the question says to find 2 + 4 + 6 + ⋯ + 1 0 0 , we simply subtract the sum of 1 + 3 + 5 + ⋯ + 9 9 which is 2 5 0 0 (given) from 5 0 5 0 to obtain 2 5 5 0 as our result.
Is it possible to solve this question without knowing that 1+2+...+n = n(n+1)/2 ?
Log in to reply
obviously. if you think.........1+the last number =2+ the 2nd last number=3+ the 3rd last number=.........
so, i will get some equal pairs . again,if it is odd then, at first calculate the digits without the last number and then add it.
The sequence of numbers is an arithmetic progression .
n = 2 1 0 0 = 5 0
S = 2 5 0 ( 2 + 1 0 0 ) = 2 5 5 0
If you didn't know the formula of an arithmetic progression sum, can you still evaluate the given expression?
Yup, that's it. Is the first equation actually necessary to solve this question?
1+2+3+........+99 = 4950, but in Q. given is = 2500
So 1 is = 0.505050505051 & 100 is = 50.5050505051
Therefore 2+3+4+....................+100 = 2550 [ 2500 - 0.50505051 + 50.50505051 = 2550
the question has been fixed
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
1 + 3 + 5 ..... 99 = 2500 (eq1)
2 + 4 + 6 .....100 = x (eq2)
(Eq2) - (Eq1) gives
(2-1) + (4-3) + (6-5)....(100-99) = x - 2500
Therefore, 50(1) = x - 2500
So, x = 2550