Three Men In Three Suits

$\color{#D61F06}{\text{Mr. Red}}$ replied to the man in the $\color{#3D99F6}{\text{Blue suit}}$ , who could either be $\color{#3D99F6}{\text{Mr. Blue}}$ or $\color{#20A900}{\text{Mr. Green}}$ .
However, because none of the men are wearing the color that matches their name, it cannot be that $\color{#D61F06}{\text{Mr. Red}}$ is replying to $\color{#3D99F6}{\text{Mr. Blue}}$ (otherwise Mr. Blue would be wearing the suit that matches his name).
So it must be that $\color{#D61F06}{\text{Mr. Red}}$ is replying to $\color{#20A900}{\text{Mr. Green}}$ .
So $\color{#20A900}{\large\textbf{Mr. Green}}$ is the man in the $\color{#3D99F6}{\large\textbf{blue suit}}$ .

We know that no one is wearing a suit that matches their names. This means that:

Mr. Red: Blue or Green

Mr. Blue: Red or Green

Mr. Green: Blue or Red

Additionally, Mr. Red replies to the man in the blue suit. This means that:

Mr Red: Not Blue

We now have:

Mr. Red: Green

Mr. Blue: Red or (Green-not possible anymore, Mr. Red has it)

Mr. Green: Blue or (Red-not possible anymore, Mr. Blue has it)

The final result:

Mr. Red: Green

Mr. Blue: Red

Mr. Green: Blue

Conclusion: Mr. Green wears a blue suit.

Situation is as follows in picture 1

1st situation is not possible because they are not wearing what is their name

so,situations left B R G and,R G B <as in picture 2 shown>

now man wearing blue says that" none of us is wearing a suit color that matches our name" and MR. red Turned to him<one wearing blue shirt>

So. Mr. red is not wearing Blue Shirt.So situation 3 is also wrong<shown in picture 3>

HENCE we find that situation 2 is correct and mr. green is wearing BLUE <shown in picture 4>

picture 1 picture 2 picture 3 picture 4

• Mr. Green or Mr. Red is wearing a blue suit. as Mr. Red turned to him so that means the man with the blue suit has to be MR.GREEN

The man in the blue suit said to the others: "Have you noticed that none of us is wearing a suit color that matches our own name?"

Mr. Red then turned to him and exclaimed "You're absolutely right!" if that is the case then the guy in the blue suit is not Mr. Blue because according to his "true" statement none of them has the same color as their name. He is not Mr. Red because Mr. Red is a different person, he is the one that replied to the guy in the blue suit. So Mr. Green is the guy in the blue suit

Man with blue suit made a statement ( either Mr. Red or Mr. green ) and made Mr. Red turn to him which indicated that the person who was speaking is Mr green. So Mr red looked to Mr green wearing a blue suit which makes sense that Mr. red was wearing a green suit. That indicated that Mr blue is wearing red.

First, let's draw a table and we know each man cannot wear the same colour suit as his name, so we cross it out.

Then, we know that the man in the blue suit cannot be Mr Blue or it will contradict Mr Red's statement. It also can't be Mr Red because he is the one speaking. So the man in the blue suit must be Mr Green.

Since the blue suit has been taken and Mr Red cannot wear a red suit, Mr Red wears a green suit. As for Mr Blue, the green and blue suit have already been taken, so he wears the red suit.

Here is the completed table:

I got it right, but only by assuming, with no confirming information, that the wearers of the suit don't know what color they are wearing. To be a valid problem, that should be stated.

This is the third "logic" problem today I've found with a glaring flaw, and I am rapidly coming to realize that to solve a "Brilliant" problem one must assume there are glaring flaws and hunt for them before answering the question. Just saying. I'm going to go do other stuff now.