Mischievous Sam is sitting in a moving bus. At the moment he spots his best friend Jim standing on the footpath, Sam throws a water balloon directly at Jim.
Will the balloon hit Jim?
Note:
For simplicity, treat Jim and the balloon as if they are point particles.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
If w is half of Jim's width, d is the distance of Jim to the balloon, u is the speed of the bus, then one could launch the balloon at speed v = w d u and still hit Jim. Realistic values would be d = 5 m, w = 0 . 3 m, u = 6 m/s, so that v = 1 0 0 m/s or 225 mph-- a very fast balloon.
But the balloon must have a decent speed, otherwise it splashes on the ground before reaching Jim. If the balloon is tossed from height h , we need a minimum speed of v = d g / 2 h . With h = 1 . 5 m and g = 1 0 m/s/s, this minimum speed is nearly 10 m/s, or 23 mph-- still pretty fast.
And how big is jim...
This problem is only difficult insofar as the language used. Colloquially if you throw an object at someone that doesn't mean you are throwing the object at the stationary point they currently occupy in your reference frame.
Otherwise none would ever catch a pass in football. This isn't even including gravity which will further throw you off
Log in to reply
In football, the players are trained to throw balls after taking care of their relative motions.
Log in to reply
Where does the puzzle say that Jim didn't take care of their relative motions? If one player is stationary, and the one throwing the ball is moving, he is going to throw the ball "direct at" the non-moving player. Because he knows how to do that.
The qualifier is that they are point particles - otherwise the question is not really solvable for the real world without more data. Although of course in the real world the human brain will allow for speed angle etc.
As also the fact Sam will probably be friendless!
Log in to reply
Human brain allowing for speed angle etc is ruled out because problem says "throws ... directly at ..." Read the problem carefully, please.
Actually, there is also another reason the balloon will miss Jim. Being a bus, the window will be up. No balloon will be thrown out.
no. excses throw a bus throwthly in the days off ouer,s.thank uou!
While I understand that we're looking at the problem from a maths/physics perspective, in reality, the balloon is very likely to hit Jim because the human brain is quite good at correcting speed differentials and inertia on the go. A simple way of corroborating this is to walk briskly while tossing a ball high into the air. By all means, the ball should always fall behind you, more or less onto the spot you were when you toss it, but you'll find out that with the slightest application of intentional direction, you can always make the ball fall back into your hand, your brain effortlessly calculating and executing what on a paper would be a complex parabolic trajectory.
It bears mentioning, though, that if the bus is moving at a very high speed, the balloon is likely to miss if only because the thrower's arm is not capable of moving fast enough to compensate the distance traversed by the bus in that short lapse.
Log in to reply
The "compensation", by definition, is not "directly at Jim".
Log in to reply
@Edgar Lemos - Also, a ball tossed high straight up while walking briskly will NOT (and should not) fall behind you for precisely the same reason that the balloon shot straight at Jim will miss him. This is because the ball has the same horizontal velocity as the walker and the horizontal velocity is maintained (ignoring negligible wind drag).
A ball tossed high straight up while walking briskly will NOT (and should not) fall behind you for precisely the same reason that the balloon shot straight at Jim will miss him. This is because the ball has the same horizontal velocity as the walker and the horizontal velocity is maintained (ignoring negligible wind drag). The point is that the brain is not doing any "correcting speed differentials and inertia on the go" to make the ball fall back to the walker. It is simple physics. I suggest you refresh your high school physics once again and not overanalyze the problem.
Log in to reply
Fair enough, I provided a poor example. That doesn't take away from the point that the brain does compensate and correct on the go. Also, I wouldn't say it is over analyzing when I'm simply referring to empiric results in a real life scenario. Sports wouldn't be a thing if you couldn't toss or kick a ball and have it land where you want regardless of your horizontal speed.
Nevertheless, I regret to bring it up. The problem is clearly a hypothetical case constructed for exact responses using exclusively math constants.
Log in to reply
@Edgar Lemos – An athlete running with a ball learns to aim behind the target!
Log in to reply
@Arjen Vreugdenhil – If the ball was not thrown "directly at" the non-moving target, it will miss. Where you "aim" and where you "throw" are two different things.
Tautologically, if the balloon misses Jim, then Sam didn't throw it "directly at" him.
Another possibility: the moving bus is moving incredibly slow, so its velocity is negligible compared to Jim's width.
The right answer. "Directly at Jim" means "in the direction such that it will hit Jim". What the question setter seems to have meant is "in the direction of the vector that is the sum of the velocity vector of the bus and the displacement vector between Jim and the thrower."
This question makes no sense. How can you say the balloon will either definitely hit or miss the target? Also, the speed the bus is travelling at is not mentioned so it is impossible to take that into account without the relevant information. As for the answer being that it will miss the target, I bet if you actually carried out this theory in real life, Jim could quite easily end up getting a water balloon in the face (considering it was thrown "directly" at him).
Log in to reply
A clarification has been mentioned which state to consider the balloon and the target as point particles. This should satisfy your above concern.
If it were I, he'd have a face drenched with water.
compared with Jim's width
When Sam throws the balloon, the balloon has the inertial equal to the bus. The inertia of the balloon causes it to move towards the right and miss Jim.
Another scenario is that balloon does not even reach Jim (without the inertia)
You mean velocity, not inertia.
When the baloon is in Sam's hand, it moves with the same velocity as him which is the velocity of the bus. When the baloon is thrown it has a velocity (the velocity at the instant of launch) in the direction of motion of bus. So, it will hit some distance apart in direction of initial motion from Jim due to that forward component of velocity.
When the balloon is thrown it has a velocity (the velocity at the instant of launch) in the direction of motion of the bus.
Why does the balloon have a velocity to the direction of the bus instead of hitting Jim?
Due to constant speed of the bus, it will miss Jim. The bus is keep moving and Jim is just standing on the his position, he is not walking. As a result it changes the direction of the water balloon and misses jim. Constant speed of the bus is the reason here.
What changes the direction of the water balloon, exactly?
When he is throwing it, the bus is moving so the balloon 🎈 may just miss Jim. Also, you shouldn't throw water 💦 balloons 🎈 at people as this may get you banned from using buses, sme serious trouble from your parents and if the balloon had hit Jim, Sam will be in really, really big trouble.
wTF you appear lk my mother or the police "you will be in really, really BIG t~r~oubl~e!" Uhhh~hh
I love this solution 😂😂😂
Just let Sam do what he wants.
the best solution!!!
Why is the kid even attacking Jim? Violence is never the answer, so for the sake of religion, no matter how hard you hope it'll hit, it won't
haha😂. you made me laugh.
But Jim threw one at him first.
Lol! This solution went from 23 upvotes to 0.
Log in to reply
Ha, that's sad...oh well...
When did it have 23? What happened?
Log in to reply
Computer glitch? Or maybe everyone that upvoted just thought about it and pressed un-upvote...at least I upvoted...
Two scenarios exist where the balloon can hit Jim:
Then what do you think is the answer, actually?
Basically, busses have things called windows, and that shield people from projectiles such as water balloons
Note: this problemo actually happened to me when I had to throw the garbage (no I wasn't throwing a water balloon at my friend)
As the car approached the bin, I threw the garbage bag directly towards the bin, But it landed besides it!
And it makes sense, because the bag was moving towards the bin AND also in the same direction of the car ; so it missed and that's what happened to poor Sam and lucky Jim.😊
Sam had to throw the balloon earlier; and I should have thrown the bag earlier too... Which actually worked!
If Sam throws the balloon at Jim immediately the moment he sees Jim, the balloon will miss since it also keeps moving sideways at the same non-zero speed that the bus was moving when thrown. Sam could hit Jim if he properly calculated the angle to the right of Jim (therefore Not throwing at Jim) when he sees him to compensate for the distance travelled by the balloon sideways.
As Jim is stationary and Sam along with balloon is moving, therefore Jim is moving backward relative to Sam. At the instant when they both are near each other, when Sam will throw balloon on Jim, the balloon will also move with the same velocity as of the bus. Therefore the balloon will remain ahead of Jim and could never catch him.
The direction of movement of the balloon is directly out of the bus, and the direction of movement of the bus is perpendicular to that of the balloon. So adding these two vectors, the resultant motion of the balloon would actually be at some angle (can be calculated based on ratio of speeds of the balloon and the bus) from the direction the balloon was thrown in.
It's relative velocity. Everyone knows you have to lead a moving target.
What do you mean by relative velocity? From which object's perspective?
Throwing the balloon gives the ball on a second velocity component making it move diagonally right?
Yes, that's right. It is because of the second velocity with the same direction as the bus caused the balloon to move slightly in that direction.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Relative to Sam, Jim is moving to the backward. When the balloon arrives at Jim's original position (relative to the moving bus), Jim is no longer there. The balloon will miss.
Having said that, the answer "It will hit Jim" could be defended. If the balloon has a very high speed, its sideways motion due to the speed of the bus will be so little that it may hit Jim only a little to the side. Also, drag forces will slow down the balloon.