a 1 x 1 + a 2 x 2 + a 3 x 3 + a 4 x 4 a 7 x 1 + a 6 x 2 + a 5 x 3 + a 8 x 4 a 1 1 x 1 + a 1 2 x 2 + a 1 3 x 3 + a 1 0 x 4 a 1 7 x 1 + a 1 6 x 2 + a 1 5 x 3 + a 1 4 x 4 = 1 4 3 2 = 2 3 4 1 = 3 4 1 2 = 4 3 2 1
Suppose a 1 , a 2 , a 3 , … , a 1 5 , a 1 6 , a 1 7 form an arithmetic progression such that a 9 = 2 5 7 . Find the value of ⌊ x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 ⌋ .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Nice observation about the terms of the AP averaging out nicely.
What is the reason that you needed "non-constant AP"? That should be evident from the conditions in the question right?
Wait, shouldn't the sum of the first and last equations equal the sum of the inner equations??? Wouldn't that mean that the question is flawed?
Log in to reply
Yeah same principle works for the 1st and 4th, and the 2nd and 3rd equations, but the sums of the two are different. The problem should be fixed if you interchange some of the a's in each column such that you can't add only two equations and get the cancelation from the averaging. Such as switching around a1 and a7 or something. By the way this is a really cool problem.
Log in to reply
I fixed it by replacing 1 2 3 4 by 1 4 3 2 so that this equality gets established : 1 4 3 2 + 4 3 2 1 = 2 3 4 1 + 3 4 1 2 , proving that a solution set exists for the system. Also I added floor function so as to have an integer as an answer. This is a nice blend of AP and system of equations , Isn't it? ;)
Thanks , I got your point I have edited the question such that the answer still remains the same :)
That is true. One should check that there is indeed a solution set to the problem.
The question is correct. You can observe after getting it solved using Excel.
Log in to reply
He edited it...read the comments.
Log in to reply
@Alan Yan – Not realize whether there was a change but he said the answer still remained the same. I think I am reading the same version of question. The question is surprisingly correct with sum equals to 11506/(4*257) although x1, x2, x3 and x4 cannot be fixed values.
Log in to reply
@Lu Chee Ket – I introduced the floor function to make the answer same. Or it would have been in decimals...
Log in to reply
@Nihar Mahajan – After reading the solution you wrote, I find that this become an easy situation. I actually went through more complicated tasks. Making 11 as answer makes the question more confidential when writings here are not read. I like this question very much!
Cool :P! Great solution!
Same solution!You beat me to writing it!:P
Log in to reply
Hehe. Better luck next time :P
Log in to reply
Thanx!:PCould you please help me with my doubt?I have tagged you.
Nice observation about the terms of the AP averaging out nicely.
What is the reason that you needed "non-constant AP"? That should be evident from the conditions in the question right?
Log in to reply
Yeah , its pretty evident from the conditions in the question. Thanks I removed that. Also this question was flawed as mentioned by Alan and Rajen Sir , I have fixed it in such a way that the answer still remains the same , not causing you further trouble.
Have you seen such question before? Actually I was inspired by this question where the simple addition of equations , gave the answer away. So what if we blend AP in it? And I did it! haha!
Same solution! :)
Same solution and really its nice problem...
{1432 <--> 4321} and {2341 <--> 3412} swapped got the same sum or same answer.
{255, 254, 253, 256 <--> 249, 250, 251, 252} and
{265, 264, 263, 262 <--> 259, 260, 261, 258} also the same.
Examples for actual values not bothered for specific cases:
d = 1; 2;
x4 = -467.018482490272; -219.518482490271;
x3 = -1065.19824024794; -524.124560848676;
x2 = 2176.49278399786; 1074.09542519931;
x1 = -633.083454255754; -319.259774856465;
Sum = 11.192607003896; 11.192607003901.
Make a matrix AX=B, apply the row operation, R 1=R 1+R 2+R 3+R 4 , which will give you in first row all four elements as: 4a 1 + 32d where d is the common difference of successive members and which can also be written as 4 (a 1 +8d) or 4a 9. Apply now R 1=R 1/4a 9 . Hence x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 =11506/4a 9 = 11.2 . hence the answer is 11
11.192607003891 regardless of changes for x1 + x2 + x3 + x4.
Solving 2 x 2 for x4, then x3 and back again for x2 and x1 with distance of A.P. remained change-able, despite changes of x1, x2, x3 and x4, their sum is constant.
Indeterminate of 0/ 0 simply means something although a given formula like Cramer's method send this message by not solving them. Lines on 2 dimensional plan with different slopes must intercept even when drifted away from the origin. But for 3 dimensional, situation become less favorable. Therefore, a determinant of 3 x 3 can easily get 0 magnitude with several distinct or separated A.P. combined in.
In fact, Cramer's message is right as x1, x2, x3 and x4 cannot be fixed individually.
Just to share with you:
1 5 9 = 9.59233E-13
34 35 36
67 65 63
1 65 36 = 283157
35 5 67
63 34 9
0 10 20 = 0
39 22 5
78 34 -10
As a 1 , a 2 , a 3 , … , a 9 , … , a 1 5 , a 1 6 , a 1 7 form an arithmetic progression.
So, any a n could be written in terms of a 1 as a n = a 1 + ( n − 1 ) r , for n ∈ N and n > 0 .
In fact, as an arithmetic progression, it could be written in terms of any term, as a n = a n − 1 + r , for n ∈ N and n > 0 . So a 1 0 = a 9 + r , and a 9 = a 8 + r ⇒ a 8 = a 9 − r .
Generalizing all terms in terms of a 9 , the arithmetic progression would be written as a n = a 9 + ( n − 9 ) r , for n ∈ N and n > 0 .
As a 9 = 2 5 7 , so a n = 2 5 7 + ( n − 9 ) r , for n ∈ N and n > 0 .
Now, let's do equation 2 + equation 3, substituting terms for their a 9 = 2 5 7 based definitions (could be equation 1 + equation 4 too, anyway):
Equation 2: ( 2 5 7 − 2 r ) x 1 + ( 2 5 7 − 3 r ) x 2 + ( 2 5 7 − 4 r ) x 3 + ( 2 5 7 − r ) x 4 = 2 3 4 1
Equation 3: ( 2 5 7 + 2 r ) x 1 + ( 2 5 7 + 3 r ) x 2 + ( 2 5 7 + 4 r ) x 3 + ( 2 5 7 + r ) x 4 = 3 4 1 2
Equation 2 + Equation 3: ( 2 5 7 − 2 r + 2 5 7 + 2 r ) x 1 + ( 2 5 7 − 3 r + 2 5 7 + 3 r ) x 2 + ( 2 5 7 − 4 r + 2 5 7 + 4 r ) x 3 + ( 2 5 7 − r + 2 5 7 + r ) x 4 = 2 3 4 1 + 3 4 1 2
( 2 ⋅ 2 5 7 ) ( x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 ) = 5 7 5 3
( x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 ) = 5 1 4 5 7 5 3
( x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 ) = 1 1 . 1 9 2 6 0 …
⌊ x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 ⌋ = 1 1
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Observe that the arithmetic mean of all these four groups of terms ( a 1 , a 7 , a 1 1 , a 1 7 ) , ( a 2 , a 6 , a 1 2 , a 1 6 ) , ( a 3 , a 5 , a 1 3 , a 1 5 ) , ( a 4 , a 8 , a 1 0 , a 1 4 ) is the same and it is ( a 9 ) . Thus we have:
( a 1 + a 7 + a 1 1 + a 1 7 ) = ( a 3 + a 5 + a 1 3 + a 1 5 ) = ( a 2 + a 6 + a 1 2 + a 1 6 ) = ( a 4 + a 8 + a 1 0 + a 1 4 ) = 4 × a 9 = 4 × 2 5 7
Now add all the equations to get the following:
x 1 ( a 1 + a 7 + a 1 1 + a 1 7 ) + x 3 ( a 3 + a 5 + a 1 3 + a 1 5 ) ⇒ x 1 ( 4 × 2 5 7 ) + x 2 ( 4 × 2 5 7 ) + x 2 ( a 2 + a 6 + a 1 2 + a 1 6 ) + x 4 ( a 4 + a 8 + a 1 0 + a 1 4 ) = 1 1 5 0 6 + x 3 ( 4 × 2 5 7 ) + x 4 ( 4 × 2 5 7 ) = 1 1 5 0 6 ⇒ ( 4 × 2 5 7 ) ( x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 ) = 1 1 5 0 6 ⇒ x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 = 4 × 2 5 7 1 1 5 0 6 ≈ 1 1 . 1 9 2 ⇒ ⌊ x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 ⌋ = 1 1