Too many unknowns!

Algebra Level 5

a 1 x 1 + a 2 x 2 + a 3 x 3 + a 4 x 4 = 1432 a 7 x 1 + a 6 x 2 + a 5 x 3 + a 8 x 4 = 2341 a 11 x 1 + a 12 x 2 + a 13 x 3 + a 10 x 4 = 3412 a 17 x 1 + a 16 x 2 + a 15 x 3 + a 14 x 4 = 4321 \large{\begin{aligned} \color{#D61F06}{a_1x_1 + a_2x_2+a_3x_3+a_4x_4} &= \color{#D61F06}{1432} \\ \color{#20A900}{a_7x_1 + a_6x_2+a_5x_3+a_8x_4} &= \color{#20A900}{2341} \\ \color{#3D99F6}{a_{11}x_1 + a_{12}x_2+a_{13}x_3+a_{10}x_4} &= \color{#3D99F6}{3412} \\ \color{magenta}{a_{17}x_1 + a_{16}x_2+a_{15}x_3+a_{14}x_4} &= \color{magenta}{4321} \end{aligned} }

Suppose a 1 , a 2 , a 3 , , a 15 , a 16 , a 17 a_1 , a_2 , a_3, \ldots, a_{15} , a_{16} , a_{17} form an arithmetic progression such that a 9 = 257 a_9=257 . Find the value of x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 \color{#624F41}{\lfloor x_1 + x_2+x_3+x_4 \rfloor} .


The answer is 11.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

4 solutions

Nihar Mahajan
Oct 15, 2015

Observe that the arithmetic mean of all these four groups of terms ( a 1 , a 7 , a 11 , a 17 ) , ( a 2 , a 6 , a 12 , a 16 ) , ( a 3 , a 5 , a 13 , a 15 ) , ( a 4 , a 8 , a 10 , a 14 ) \large(a_1,a_7,a_{11},a_{17}),(a_2,a_6,a_{12},a_{16}),(a_3,a_5,a_{13},a_{15}),(a_4,a_8,a_{10},a_{14}) is the same and it is ( a 9 ) \large{(a_9)} . Thus we have:

( a 1 + a 7 + a 11 + a 17 ) = ( a 2 + a 6 + a 12 + a 16 ) = ( a 3 + a 5 + a 13 + a 15 ) = ( a 4 + a 8 + a 10 + a 14 ) = 4 × a 9 = 4 × 257 \large{\begin{aligned} (a_1+a_7+a_{11}+a_{17}) &=(a_2+a_6+a_{12}+a_{16}) \\ =(a_3+a_5+a_{13}+a_{15}) &=(a_4+a_8+a_{10}+a_{14})=4\times a_9= 4\times 257 \end{aligned}}

Now add all the equations to get the following:

x 1 ( a 1 + a 7 + a 11 + a 17 ) + x 2 ( a 2 + a 6 + a 12 + a 16 ) + x 3 ( a 3 + a 5 + a 13 + a 15 ) + x 4 ( a 4 + a 8 + a 10 + a 14 ) = 11506 x 1 ( 4 × 257 ) + x 2 ( 4 × 257 ) + x 3 ( 4 × 257 ) + x 4 ( 4 × 257 ) = 11506 ( 4 × 257 ) ( x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 ) = 11506 x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 = 11506 4 × 257 11.192 x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 = 11 \large{\begin{aligned} x_1(a_1+a_7+a_{11}+a_{17}) &+x_2(a_2+a_6+a_{12}+a_{16}) \\ +x_3(a_3+a_5+a_{13}+a_{15}) &+ x_4(a_4+a_8+a_{10}+a_{14}) =11506\\ \Rightarrow x_1(4\times 257)+x_2(4\times 257) &+x_3(4\times 257)+x_4(4\times 257) = 11506\end{aligned} \\ \Rightarrow (4\times 257)(x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4) =11506 \\ \Rightarrow x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4 = \dfrac{11506}{4\times 257} \approx 11.192 \\ \Rightarrow \lfloor x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4 \rfloor = \Large{\boxed{11}}}

Moderator note:

Nice observation about the terms of the AP averaging out nicely.

What is the reason that you needed "non-constant AP"? That should be evident from the conditions in the question right?

Wait, shouldn't the sum of the first and last equations equal the sum of the inner equations??? Wouldn't that mean that the question is flawed?

@Calvin Lin

Alan Yan - 5 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Yeah same principle works for the 1st and 4th, and the 2nd and 3rd equations, but the sums of the two are different. The problem should be fixed if you interchange some of the a's in each column such that you can't add only two equations and get the cancelation from the averaging. Such as switching around a1 and a7 or something. By the way this is a really cool problem.

Jonathan Hocker - 5 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

I fixed it by replacing 1234 1234 by 1432 1432 so that this equality gets established : 1432 + 4321 = 2341 + 3412 1432+4321=2341+3412 , proving that a solution set exists for the system. Also I added floor function so as to have an integer as an answer. This is a nice blend of AP and system of equations , Isn't it? ;)

Nihar Mahajan - 5 years, 8 months ago

Thanks , I got your point I have edited the question such that the answer still remains the same :)

Nihar Mahajan - 5 years, 8 months ago

That is true. One should check that there is indeed a solution set to the problem.

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 8 months ago

The question is correct. You can observe after getting it solved using Excel.

Lu Chee Ket - 5 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

He edited it...read the comments.

Alan Yan - 5 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Alan Yan Not realize whether there was a change but he said the answer still remained the same. I think I am reading the same version of question. The question is surprisingly correct with sum equals to 11506/(4*257) although x1, x2, x3 and x4 cannot be fixed values.

Lu Chee Ket - 5 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Lu Chee Ket I introduced the floor function to make the answer same. Or it would have been in decimals...

Nihar Mahajan - 5 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Nihar Mahajan After reading the solution you wrote, I find that this become an easy situation. I actually went through more complicated tasks. Making 11 as answer makes the question more confidential when writings here are not read. I like this question very much!

Lu Chee Ket - 5 years, 8 months ago

Cool :P! Great solution!

Rohit Udaiwal - 5 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks! :)

Nihar Mahajan - 5 years, 8 months ago

Same solution!You beat me to writing it!:P

Adarsh Kumar - 5 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Hehe. Better luck next time :P

Nihar Mahajan - 5 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanx!:PCould you please help me with my doubt?I have tagged you.

Adarsh Kumar - 5 years, 8 months ago

Nice observation about the terms of the AP averaging out nicely.

What is the reason that you needed "non-constant AP"? That should be evident from the conditions in the question right?

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Yeah , its pretty evident from the conditions in the question. Thanks I removed that. Also this question was flawed as mentioned by Alan and Rajen Sir , I have fixed it in such a way that the answer still remains the same , not causing you further trouble.

Have you seen such question before? Actually I was inspired by this question where the simple addition of equations , gave the answer away. So what if we blend AP in it? And I did it! haha!

Nihar Mahajan - 5 years, 8 months ago

Same solution! :)

Nanda Rahsyad - 5 years, 6 months ago

Same solution and really its nice problem...

Dev Sharma - 5 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Glad to see that you liked and solved it :)

Nihar Mahajan - 5 years, 8 months ago

{1432 <--> 4321} and {2341 <--> 3412} swapped got the same sum or same answer.

{255, 254, 253, 256 <--> 249, 250, 251, 252} and

{265, 264, 263, 262 <--> 259, 260, 261, 258} also the same.

Examples for actual values not bothered for specific cases:

d = 1; 2;

x4 = -467.018482490272; -219.518482490271;

x3 = -1065.19824024794; -524.124560848676;

x2 = 2176.49278399786; 1074.09542519931;

x1 = -633.083454255754; -319.259774856465;

Sum = 11.192607003896; 11.192607003901.

Lu Chee Ket - 5 years, 8 months ago
Sajan Kapil
Oct 19, 2015

Make a matrix AX=B, apply the row operation, R 1=R 1+R 2+R 3+R 4 , which will give you in first row all four elements as: 4a 1 + 32d where d is the common difference of successive members and which can also be written as 4 (a 1 +8d) or 4a 9. Apply now R 1=R 1/4a 9 . Hence x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 =11506/4a 9 = 11.2 . hence the answer is 11

Lu Chee Ket
Oct 16, 2015

11.192607003891 regardless of changes for x1 + x2 + x3 + x4.

Solving 2 x 2 for x4, then x3 and back again for x2 and x1 with distance of A.P. remained change-able, despite changes of x1, x2, x3 and x4, their sum is constant.

Indeterminate of 0/ 0 simply means something although a given formula like Cramer's method send this message by not solving them. Lines on 2 dimensional plan with different slopes must intercept even when drifted away from the origin. But for 3 dimensional, situation become less favorable. Therefore, a determinant of 3 x 3 can easily get 0 magnitude with several distinct or separated A.P. combined in.

In fact, Cramer's message is right as x1, x2, x3 and x4 cannot be fixed individually.

Just to share with you:

1 5 9 = 9.59233E-13

34 35 36

67 65 63

1 65 36 = 283157

35 5 67

63 34 9

0 10 20 = 0

39 22 5

78 34 -10

Lu Chee Ket - 5 years, 8 months ago
Bruno Nascimento
Oct 16, 2015

As a 1 , a 2 , a 3 , , a 9 , , a 15 , a 16 , a 17 a_1, a_2, a_3, \ldots, a_9, \ldots, a_{15}, a_{16}, a_{17} form an arithmetic progression.

So, any a n a_{n} could be written in terms of a 1 a_1 as a n = a 1 + ( n 1 ) r a_{n} = a_1 + (n-1)r , for n N n \in \mathbb{N} and n > 0 n > 0 .

In fact, as an arithmetic progression, it could be written in terms of any term, as a n = a n 1 + r a_{n} = a_{n-1} + r , for n N n \in \mathbb{N} and n > 0 n > 0 . So a 10 = a 9 + r a_{10} = a_9 + r , and a 9 = a 8 + r a 8 = a 9 r a_9 = a_8 + r \Rightarrow a_8 = a_9 - r .

Generalizing all terms in terms of a 9 a_9 , the arithmetic progression would be written as a n = a 9 + ( n 9 ) r a_{n} = a_9 + (n - 9)r , for n N n \in \mathbb{N} and n > 0 n > 0 .

As a 9 = 257 a_9 = 257 , so a n = 257 + ( n 9 ) r a_{n} = 257 + (n - 9)r , for n N n \in \mathbb{N} and n > 0 n > 0 .

Now, let's do equation 2 + equation 3, substituting terms for their a 9 = 257 a_9 = 257 based definitions (could be equation 1 + equation 4 too, anyway):

Equation 2: ( 257 2 r ) x 1 + ( 257 3 r ) x 2 + ( 257 4 r ) x 3 + ( 257 r ) x 4 = 2341 (257 - 2r)x_1 + (257 - 3r)x_2 + (257 - 4r)x_3 + (257 - r)x_4 = 2341

Equation 3: ( 257 + 2 r ) x 1 + ( 257 + 3 r ) x 2 + ( 257 + 4 r ) x 3 + ( 257 + r ) x 4 = 3412 (257 + 2r)x_1 + (257 + 3r)x_2 + (257 + 4r)x_3 + (257 + r)x_4 = 3412

Equation 2 + Equation 3: ( 257 2 r + 257 + 2 r ) x 1 + ( 257 3 r + 257 + 3 r ) x 2 + ( 257 4 r + 257 + 4 r ) x 3 + ( 257 r + 257 + r ) x 4 = 2341 + 3412 (257- 2r+257+2r)x_1 + (257-3r+257+3r)x_2 + (257-4r+257+4r)x_3 + (257-r+257+r)x_4 = 2341 + 3412

( 2 257 ) ( x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 ) = 5753 (2 \cdot 257) (x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4) = 5753

( x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 ) = 5753 514 (x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4) = \frac {5753}{514}

( x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 ) = 11.19260 (x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4) = 11.19260\ldots

x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + x 4 = 11 \lfloor x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 \rfloor = \boxed{11}

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...