A circuit is built by connecting 1 Ω wires in a pattern of triangles, as shown above. Point A is the common vertex of all triangles, and point B is a vertex of one of the triangles at the end of the pattern.
Let n be the number of triangles in the pattern. (In the diagram above, n = 7 .)
Determine the resistance between points A and B in the limit where the pattern of wires grows to infinitely many triangles, i.e. n → ∞ lim R A B
Give your answer to 3 decimal places.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Exactly ! It is the simple modification of rectangular arrangement into a triangular one .
Log in to reply
sir how you solve such hard questions... it is worth admiring...... sir you are seriously a genius sir ... a big salute to you sir.....
A great solution! Effectively, your solution assumes that adding another triangle should not affect the overall resistance.
Log in to reply
Yes... exactly!
Log in to reply
Well I don't understand either one . how you get that eqn I.e ( p+r)r/p+2r
Log in to reply
@Gaurang Goyal – I hope the soln. Is clear till the 2nd ckt. In that case P is the final resistance between the lower and upper parts (A and B) of the ckt. But as has been shown P between A and B is nothing but (P in series with R) in parallel with R which gives the above equation (as the ladder is infinite). Better now?
Do you mind when I will say ,'' exactly the same "
I came up with the same solution! :D
Sir can u elaborate a little more
Log in to reply
Relevant wiki: check this out A similar problem, "infinite ladder of resistors," is presented there as an example.
Suppose the circuit is built with n triangles, and therefore k = 2 n + 1 wires. We number the wires as follows:
The arrows show how the current will flow is point A is connected to the higher voltage.
Now we add the next wire:
Applying Kirchhoff's current/junction rule to the red arrows shown, we find I k + 1 = I k − 1 + I k .
Now close the triangle by yet another wire:
Apply Kirchhoff's voltage/loop rule to the triangle marked with red arrows: V k + 2 = V k + V k + 1 . Since all wires have the same resistance, we can divide ( V / R = I ) and find I k + 2 = I k + I k + 1 .
This shows that the currents in the wires satisfy the recurrence relation I k + 2 = I k + I k + 1 k ≥ 1 . I 1 = I 2 . The solution is the Fibonacci sequence, up to a factor that depends on the applied voltage: I k = f k I 1 .
The total current flowing from A to B is I A B = I k + 1 + I k + 2 = f k + 3 I 1 and the voltage across A and B is V A B = R I k + 2 = f k + 2 I 1 R so that R A B = I A B V A B = f k + 1 f k + 2 R , where R = 1 Ω is the resistance of a single wire. It is well-known that the ratio between successive terms in the Fibonacci sequence is the golden ratio ϕ , so R A B = ϕ 1 R = 2 5 − 1 R = 0 . 6 1 8 0 3 3 9 8 9 Ω .
Sir from where you got this problem .
Log in to reply
I made it up :)
Log in to reply
i did'nt understand it yet can u help.
If the effective resistance between A and B in a circuit with n triangles is R n Ω , then the circuit with n + 1 triangles is equivalent to a resistance of 1 Ω and a resistance of 1 + R n Ω in parallel, and hence R n + 1 − 1 = 1 + ( 1 + R n ) − 1 Since R 1 = 3 2 , it is a simple induction that R n = F 2 n + 2 F 2 n + 1 , where F n are the Fibonacci numbers, with F 0 = 0 , F 1 = 1 , ... Thus n → ∞ lim R n = ϕ − 1 where ϕ is the golden section, making the answer 0 . 6 1 8 0 3 3 9 8 8 7 . . .
How did you used fibonacci numbers ? thank you .
Log in to reply
It is a matter of proof by induction. It is clear that R 1 = F 4 F 3 . If R n = F 2 n + 2 F 2 n + 1 , then it is a simple calculation that R n + 1 = ( 1 + ( 1 + R n − 1 ) ) − 1 is equal to F 2 n + 4 F 2 n + 3 , which establishes the formula for R n . I then use the well-known fact that the ratio of successive Fibonacci numbers converges to the Golden Section.
Log in to reply
Kinda like infinite gp ?
Log in to reply
@Chirayu Bhardwaj – Not really. I am using what is called Binet's formula F n = 5 ϕ n − ( − ϕ − 1 ) n for the Fibonacci numbers. This implies that F n F n + 1 → ϕ n → ∞ .
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
A simpler way to visualise the circuit is as follows (R=1ohm)
If the Resistance between A and B is say P as the number of 'triangles' tends to infinity then the circuit simplifies to the following
From this we get
P = P + 2 R ( P + R ) ( R )
putting R=1 and solving we get P = 0 . 6 1 8 o h m s