Triangle Circuit

A circuit is built by connecting 1 Ω 1\ \Omega wires in a pattern of triangles, as shown above. Point A A is the common vertex of all triangles, and point B B is a vertex of one of the triangles at the end of the pattern.

Let n n be the number of triangles in the pattern. (In the diagram above, n = 7 n = 7 .)

Determine the resistance between points A A and B B in the limit where the pattern of wires grows to infinitely many triangles, i.e. lim n R A B \lim_{n\to\infty} R_{AB}

Give your answer to 3 decimal places.


The answer is 0.618033989.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

Milind Blaze
May 9, 2016

A simpler way to visualise the circuit is as follows (R=1ohm)

If the Resistance between A and B is say P as the number of 'triangles' tends to infinity then the circuit simplifies to the following

From this we get

P = ( P + R ) ( R ) P + 2 R P=\dfrac{(P+R)(R)}{P+2R}

putting R=1 and solving we get P = 0.618 o h m s P=0.618ohms

Exactly ! It is the simple modification of rectangular arrangement into a triangular one .

Chirayu Bhardwaj - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

sir how you solve such hard questions... it is worth admiring...... sir you are seriously a genius sir ... a big salute to you sir.....

Deepansh Jindal - 5 years, 1 month ago

A great solution! Effectively, your solution assumes that adding another triangle should not affect the overall resistance.

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Yes... exactly!

Milind Blaze - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Well I don't understand either one . how you get that eqn I.e ( p+r)r/p+2r

gaurang goyal - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Gaurang Goyal I hope the soln. Is clear till the 2nd ckt. In that case P is the final resistance between the lower and upper parts (A and B) of the ckt. But as has been shown P between A and B is nothing but (P in series with R) in parallel with R which gives the above equation (as the ladder is infinite). Better now?

Milind Blaze - 5 years, 1 month ago

Do you mind when I will say ,'' exactly the same "

Aakash Khandelwal - 5 years, 1 month ago

I came up with the same solution! :D

Erasmo Hinojosa - 5 years, 1 month ago

Sir can u elaborate a little more

Akash aggrawal - 5 years ago

Log in to reply

Relevant wiki: check this out A similar problem, "infinite ladder of resistors," is presented there as an example.

Erasmo Hinojosa - 5 years ago

Suppose the circuit is built with n n triangles, and therefore k = 2 n + 1 k = 2n+1 wires. We number the wires as follows:

The arrows show how the current will flow is point A A is connected to the higher voltage.

Now we add the next wire:

Applying Kirchhoff's current/junction rule to the red arrows shown, we find I k + 1 = I k 1 + I k . I_{k+1} = I_{k-1} + I_k.

Now close the triangle by yet another wire:

Apply Kirchhoff's voltage/loop rule to the triangle marked with red arrows: V k + 2 = V k + V k + 1 . V_{k+2} = V_k + V_{k+1}. Since all wires have the same resistance, we can divide ( V / R = I V/R = I ) and find I k + 2 = I k + I k + 1 . I_{k+2} = I_k + I_{k+1}.

This shows that the currents in the wires satisfy the recurrence relation I k + 2 = I k + I k + 1 k 1. I 1 = I 2 . I_{k+2} = I_k + I_{k+1}\ \ \ \ \ k \geq 1. \\ I_1 = I_2. The solution is the Fibonacci sequence, up to a factor that depends on the applied voltage: I k = f k I 1 . I_k = f_k\:I_1.

The total current flowing from A to B is I A B = I k + 1 + I k + 2 = f k + 3 I 1 I_{AB} = I_{k+1} + I_{k+2} = f_{k+3}\:I_1 and the voltage across A and B is V A B = R I k + 2 = f k + 2 I 1 R V_{AB} = R\:I_{k+2} = f_{k+2}\:I_1\:R so that R A B = V A B I A B = f k + 2 f k + 1 R , R_{AB} = \frac{V_{AB}}{I_{AB}} = \frac{f_{k+2}}{f_{k+1}}\:R, where R = 1 Ω R = 1\ \Omega is the resistance of a single wire. It is well-known that the ratio between successive terms in the Fibonacci sequence is the golden ratio ϕ \phi , so R A B = 1 ϕ R = 5 1 2 R = 0.618033989 Ω . R_{AB} = \frac 1\phi\:R = \frac{\sqrt 5 - 1}2\:R = \boxed{0.618033989\ \Omega}.

Sir from where you got this problem .

Deepansh Jindal - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

I made it up :)

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

i did'nt understand it yet can u help.

A Former Brilliant Member - 4 years, 10 months ago
Mark Hennings
May 9, 2016

If the effective resistance between A A and B B in a circuit with n n triangles is R n Ω R_n\,\Omega , then the circuit with n + 1 n+1 triangles is equivalent to a resistance of 1 Ω 1\,\Omega and a resistance of 1 + R n Ω 1+R_n\,\Omega in parallel, and hence R n + 1 1 = 1 + ( 1 + R n ) 1 R_{n+1}^{-1} \; = \; 1 + (1 + R_n)^{-1} Since R 1 = 2 3 R_1 = \tfrac23 , it is a simple induction that R n = F 2 n + 1 F 2 n + 2 , R_n \; = \; \frac{F_{2n+1}}{F_{2n+2}} \;, where F n F_n are the Fibonacci numbers, with F 0 = 0 F_0=0 , F 1 = 1 F_1=1 , ... Thus lim n R n = ϕ 1 \lim_{n \to \infty} R_n \; =\; \phi^{-1} where ϕ \phi is the golden section, making the answer 0.6180339887... \boxed{0.6180339887...}

How did you used fibonacci numbers ? thank you .

Chirayu Bhardwaj - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

It is a matter of proof by induction. It is clear that R 1 = F 3 F 4 R_1 = \frac{F_3}{F_4} . If R n = F 2 n + 1 F 2 n + 2 R_n = \frac{F_{2n+1}}{F_{2n+2}} , then it is a simple calculation that R n + 1 = ( 1 + ( 1 + R n 1 ) ) 1 R_{n+1} = \big(1 + (1 + R_n^{-1})\big)^{-1} is equal to F 2 n + 3 F 2 n + 4 \frac{F_{2n+3}}{F_{2n+4}} , which establishes the formula for R n R_n . I then use the well-known fact that the ratio of successive Fibonacci numbers converges to the Golden Section.

Mark Hennings - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Kinda like infinite gp ?

Chirayu Bhardwaj - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Chirayu Bhardwaj Not really. I am using what is called Binet's formula F n = ϕ n ( ϕ 1 ) n 5 F_n \; = \; \frac{\phi^n - (-\phi^{-1})^n}{\sqrt{5}} for the Fibonacci numbers. This implies that F n + 1 F n ϕ n . \frac{F_{n+1}}{F_n} \; \to \; \phi \qquad \qquad n \to \infty \;.

Mark Hennings - 5 years, 1 month ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...