Triangle In The Square

Geometry Level 2

There is a triangle being inscribed in a square.

Can the triangle cover up more than 50% of the square?

Yes, it is possible No, it is impossible

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

First, recall that the area of a triangle is 1 2 b h \dfrac 12 bh where b b denotes the length of the base and h h the height. Keeping h h fixed, we may increase b b to increase the area of the triangle. Similarly, keeping b b fixed, we may increase h h to increase the area of the triangle. This shows that the vertices must lie along the boundary of the square.

Now, we claim that one vertex lies at the corner of the square. Suppose not. Then, pick any edge of the triangle. Consider the vertex not along this edge. By moving this vertex away from the edge, we may increase the height of the triangle, by the remarks above. Since a corner of the square will be the furthest distance from our selected edge, moving the opposite vertex to the corner of the square maximizes the area.

Now, let S S be a square in the plane. Let s s denote the length of the edges of S S . Without loss of generality, we may suppose that S S lies in the first quadrant with one vertex at the origin. Consider a triangle in S S that maximizes area. By the above remarks, we may suppose that one vertex of the triangle lies at the origin.

By the above remarks on the construction of the triangle, b = s b=s . Similarly, h = s h=s . So the area of the triangle is 1 2 b h = 1 2 s 2 = 1 2 A r ( \dfrac 12 bh=\dfrac 12 s^2=\dfrac 12 Ar( Square ) ) . (You may want to argue these points more carefully, but they can be argued by using the ideas of the first two paragraphs.)

Note that the second statement is not true: Let the vertices of the sqaure be ( 0 , 0 ) , ( 1 , 0 ) , ( 0 , 1 ) , (0,0),(1,0),(0,1), and ( 1 , 1 ) (1,1) . Let the vertices of the triangle be ( 0 , 0 ) , ( 1 , 0 ) (0,0),(1,0)
and ( 1 2 , 1 ) (\dfrac 12 ,1) . Then we still have A r ( ) = 1 2 A r ( ) . Ar(△)=\dfrac 12 Ar(□).

While this is intuitively true, you haven't really shown why that's the maximum.

Jordan Cahn - 2 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

You can rotate the square in whichever direction you want, it will give you set of all possible triangles that can have maximum area. Have a look.

A Former Brilliant Member - 2 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

You make the assumption that a triangle with maximal area must share a side with the square. While this is true, you haven't actually shown it.

Jordan Cahn - 2 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

@Jordan Cahn I have edited my solution to become more generalized, hope it helps:)

A Former Brilliant Member - 2 years, 6 months ago

Look at the blue triangle (or any triangle that covers exactly 50% of the square).

If we move the top point of the triangle, it will not increase the area of the triangle because its distance from the line connecting the other 2 points is already the maximum.

If we move the bottom left point of the triangle, it will also not increase the area of the triangle because its distance from the line connecting the other 2 points is already the maximum.

Likewise for the bottom right point.

Hence, we can assume that this triangle which covers exactly 50% of the square is the maximum we can achieve, so it is impossible to cover up more than 50%.

Winston Choo - 2 years, 6 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...