Tribute to Ramanujan

Algebra Level 3

x 1729 = 1729 x { x }^{ 1729 }={ 1729 }^{ x }

Find the integral root of the above equation.


The answer is 1729.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Swapnil Das
Sep 5, 2015

x 1729 = 1729 x { x }^{ 1729 }={ 1729 }^{ x }

Taking logarithms on both sides, x log 1729 = 1729 log x x \log 1729 = 1729 \log x

log x x = log 1729 1729 \frac { \log { x } }{ x } = \frac { \log { \ 1729 } }{ 1729 }

x = 1729 x = 1729

You have just found a solution of 1729. You need to prove that it's the only solution.

Pi Han Goh - 5 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Hmm… I am trying to do so.

Swapnil Das - 5 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Just differentiate log ( x ) x \frac{\log(x)}{x} . ;)

Maggie Miller - 5 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

@Maggie Miller Why we need to differentiate ?

If we differentiate we will get ::

{ x }^{ -2 }(-\log { (x) } +1)\quad =\quad 0\ \log { (x) } \quad =\quad 1

Syed Baqir - 5 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

@Syed Baqir Ah no, I mean differentiating log ( x ) / x \log(x)/x shows that log ( x ) / x \log(x)/x is decreasing for x > e x>e . Then 1729 1729 is the only answer greater than 2 2 , and its easy to rule out 1 , 2 , 0 1,2,0 and negative integers.

Maggie Miller - 5 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

@Maggie Miller Hmm, Now I know what you mean.

Becaues the derivative gives x = e ( I think critical point ),

Syed Baqir - 5 years, 9 months ago

@Bill Bell Inspired by you!

Swapnil Das - 5 years, 9 months ago

Didn't think of that!!!

Yuki Kuriyama - 5 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Haha, no problem :)

Swapnil Das - 5 years, 9 months ago
Syed Baqir
Sep 5, 2015

If L.H.S = R.H.S

Then x = 1729 < From Bases

1729 = x <From Exponents

  • 1729 is a square free number !!

This argument would work if 1729 1729 were prime, but unfortunately it isn't. As a counterexample to the logic, by your argument the only integral solution to x 4 = 4 x x^4=4^x is 4 4 - but this is false, since 2 2 is also a solution.

However, I think you can easily fix your solution if you use the fact that 1729 1729 is square-free! :)

Maggie Miller - 5 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks, I will update my solution.

Syed Baqir - 5 years, 9 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...