Find number of roots of f ( θ ) = 8 cos θ + 2 sec θ − 7 for θ ∈ [ − 2 π , 2 π ]
All of my problems are original
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Good use of AM. GM. but I see no link between how it can have no solutions. I understood till 8 cos θ + 2 sec θ − 7 ≥ 1 , but then how did you conclude this will have no solution??
Log in to reply
As it can never be equal to 0, and for solution, it is equal to zero. So, no solutions possible.
What does it mean to have a 'solution'? We actually refer to the roots of the equation f ( x ) = 0 as the solutions. If f ( x ) > 0 , it means our function can never be 0 . And, if it can't become 0 , we won't have any roots and therefore no solutions.
Assume if the question were to find solution 8 cos θ + 2 sec θ − 9 . How would that be different?
Log in to reply
We can apply a variant of Alak's solution.
Log in to reply
Please share it with us. Today, I am getting amazing solution to a single problem.
Log in to reply
@Aryan Sanghi – It's very similar to their solution, as I have said.
If we were to investigate the equation 8 cos θ + 2 sec θ − 9 = 0 , we transform it into the equation 8 cos 2 θ − 9 cos θ + 2 = 0 . Solving, we get cos θ = 1 6 9 ± 1 7 , and both cases are a number within the range of − 1 ≤ x ≤ 1 .
If cos θ = 1 6 9 + 1 7 , then arccos θ ≈ 0 . 6 0 9 for θ in Quadrant I. To get the corresponding value in Quadrant IV, multiply by − 1 .
If cos θ = 1 6 9 − 1 7 , then arccos θ ≈ 1 . 2 6 for θ in Quadrant I. Again, to get the corresponding value in Quadrant IV, multiply by − 1 .
Therefore, the solutions to the modified problem are ± 0 . 6 0 9 and ± 1 . 2 6 .
Thanku for your solution. It's really extraordinary.
Jahid's is an elegant solution. I'm showing an elementary one.
The given equation is : 8 cos 2 θ − 7 cos θ + 2 = 0 . Discriminant of this equation is 7 2 − 4 × 8 × 2 = 4 9 − 6 4 = − 1 5 < 0 . So both the roots of the equation are complex, and the function has no real root
As always sir, your solution is excellent. Thanku for sharing it with us.
Yes, nice one, Mr. Alak!
I solved in a similar way, but after 2 months :)
8 cos θ + 2 s e c θ − 7 = 0
Multiplying everything by cos θ ,
8 cos 2 θ − 7 cos θ + 2 = 0
By quadratic formula,
cos θ = 2 ( 1 6 ) − ( − 7 ) ± ( − 7 ) 2 − 4 ( 8 ) ( 2 ) = 1 6 7 ± − 1 5
Since both roots are complex, there are no real solutions.
Excellent solution Vinayak. Thanku for sharing it with us. :)
Log in to reply
Thank you! :) I rarely find a problem in your set that I can solve, so I post a solution on ones I solve :)
Let g ( θ ) = a c o s θ + b s e c θ
Let's find minimum value of g ( θ )
g ( θ ) = a b ( b a c o s θ + a b s e c θ )
g ( θ ) = a b ( b a c o s θ + b a c o s θ 1 )
g ( θ ) = a b ( k + k 1 ) where k = b a c o s θ
Now, k + k 1 ≤ − 2 or k + k 1 ≥ 2
a b ( k + k 1 ) ≤ − 2 a b or a b ( k + k 1 ) ≥ 2 a b
g ( θ ) ≤ − 2 a b or g ( θ ) ≥ 2 a b
Putting a = 8 and b = 2
g ( θ ) ≤ − 8 or g ( θ ) ≥ 8 . . . . . . . ( 1 )
For roots of f ( θ ) = 8 c o s θ + 2 s e c θ − 7
8 c o s θ + 2 s e c θ − 7 = 0
8 c o s θ + 2 s e c θ = 7
g ( θ ) = 7 which is not possible as minimum positive value of g ( θ ) is 8 by (1)
Therefore, r o o t s = 0
You can shorten your solution by applying A M − G M at the very beginning.
a cos θ + b sec θ ≥ 2 a cos θ b sec θ = 8
I think your derivation looks good and interesting! What is the insight to take a b out of the brackets?
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
In the range [ − 2 π , 2 π ] , both cos θ and sec θ are positive functions.
Applying AM-GM, 2 8 cos θ + 2 sec θ ≥ ( 8 cos θ ) ( 2 sec θ ) ⟹ 8 cos θ + 2 sec θ ≥ 8 ⟹ 8 cos θ + 2 sec θ − 7 ≥ 1
So, there are no real solutions in this range.
P.S. AM-GM inequality follows from the fact that if ( x − y ) 2 ≥ 0 , then 2 x + y ≥ x y .