Given: ∫ 0 2 π 1 + tan 2 0 1 4 x d x = p π e q . Find p + q .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
No offence, (Im sorry if I do) but this problem was a bit easier for a problem given by you (I mean to say that you usually give very difficult problems). Please do not take this in the wrong way.
Log in to reply
I'd not take that as an insult. It's really hard! You're just too smart Anish, that's why I follow you. No matter how difficult I make a problem, you (and anyone else that I follow) still could answer it. :)
Anyway, this problem is inspired by your idea. See the problem made by Avineil Jain. I made this by looking your solution. No wonder you can solve it. :D
Log in to reply
You are too kind, my friend. I thank you for your compliments, but honestly, the same words go for you. Your other problems are really too advanced for me. I didn't solve most of your problems. I could not believe that such problems could be framed, that is why I said that your problems are truly great.
Log in to reply
@Anish Puthuraya – Anish how is your prep for JEE ?
Log in to reply
@Arijit Banerjee – Its going on..I am practicing previous AIEEE papers, and as far as theory is concerned, I am focusing on Chemistry and Mathematics (just going through all the formulas)
I assume you have already given JEE?
Log in to reply
@Anish Puthuraya – no I haven't.. I'm giving my board exams now
@Anish Puthuraya – For the benefit of the rest of us to compete with you, please post your marks in JEE Mains, after you write it on 6th April! Thanks, and best of luck for all your exams, :D
Log in to reply
@Rohan Rao – Well, that would be an estimated amount of marks, because the actual result would be declared later.
Log in to reply
@Anish Puthuraya – Yes, of course, but after checking with a few solutions from a few institutes, I am sure an average value would be quite accurate.
Log in to reply
@Rohan Rao – Well sure, I will post my marks (they would not be that good, surely)
Log in to reply
@Anish Puthuraya – You have gotta be joking. Anyway, let's do our best and compete for the best! :D
@Anish Puthuraya – It looks advanced for you because you don't take the course yet. While you learn the topic, I bet you can answer it. No doubt. BTW, good luck for your exam. Wishing you the best. :)
Log in to reply
@Tunk-Fey Ariawan – Thank you..Btw can you give a solution to your problem "Rolling Ball"?
Log in to reply
@Anish Puthuraya – Done! You can check it here . So far, only Vishnuram Leonardodavinci could solve it.
Log in to reply
@Tunk-Fey Ariawan – Nice, but could you do it with newtonian mechanics, I do not know how to deal with Lagrangian mechanics.
Btw, I just searched for Vishnuram Leonardodavinci in the search bar for members, and I found that there are two members with that same name..I wonder what that means!
Log in to reply
@Anish Puthuraya – I'm really sorry Anish, I think I can't do that since it will take a longer time to make the solution and I also must draw each force's vectors involved to the diagram. Why I use Lagrangian mechanics? Because it only deals with energy, scalar quantity so it becomes easy to handle it. Meanwhile, if you use Newtonian mechanics, you will deal with vector quantity. I do love Newtonian approach, but sometimes I use Lagrangian to solve mechanics problem because it's simplicity. I believe a smart young man like you can immediately understand Lagrangian concept. :)
I don't get it what did you mean about Vishnuram Leonardodavinci?
Log in to reply
@Tunk-Fey Ariawan – So, can you provide me with a link where I can learn Lagrangian mechanics from the basics ?
About the other thing, just search for Vishnuram leonardodavinci in the search bar and change the search from problems to members and you will see what I mean.
Log in to reply
@Anish Puthuraya – Start from this:
After you read 1 then see 2 and 3 , just go to the problems that are solved by using Lagrangian Mechanics especially in 3 , part Some Additional Examples. You can also download PDF files about Lagrangian Mechanics problems solved on Google .
@Anish Puthuraya – Hey dude...you can get a similar problem solved in Newtonian Physics in the Basic book which we have to study while preparing IIT-JEE ...which is Concepts of Physics by HC Verma ;)
Log in to reply
@Shriram Iyer – Yes, I solved it using Newtonian mechanics, but the problem is that the answer I obtained is not the same as Tunk's answer...
Log in to reply
@Anish Puthuraya – Same here, I solved it using vectors and stuff, but my answer is correct for the case of a block, and not for this rolling ball. Could you tell me what answer you got? The p/q form...
Log in to reply
@Rohan Rao – I got the p / q as 1 5 / 3 7
Log in to reply
@Anish Puthuraya – I too got the same answer. How was your AITS? I actually gave it online but since the paper was not uploaded properly I had to give up the test.
Log in to reply
@Karthik Kannan – I took time to solve Physics, so I didn't get much time to solve Maths (I attempted 17 or so).
How was your FIITJEE AITS?
Log in to reply
@Anish Puthuraya – FIIITJEE was not good as usual. I could only score in Physics (111). Chem:59, Maths (worst):33. In the Pace AITS I just solved a few questions in physics. they were pretty good, weren't they?
Log in to reply
@Karthik Kannan – Are they more difficult than actual JEE-Mains? I really want to get an idea about that..such that, I can practice a certain level of problems.
Log in to reply
@Anish Puthuraya – Certainly they are more difficult than the actual test. Though I just saw a few questions, I think this AITS of Pace was tougher than the previous ones.
Log in to reply
@Karthik Kannan – Rather, they were lengthier for me..If given more time, it was a standard paper.
Log in to reply
@Anish Puthuraya – Agreed. Time is always a key factor.
@Anish Puthuraya – I believe he cheats. He solves every problem he encounters, posting solution of none. The problem "A charge oscillating above charged square plate" had a wrong answer in the beginning and he got it correct. Indeed the first 5 solvers of the problem must have cheated(as the answer was wrong)
Log in to reply
@Jatin Yadav – Well, how do we then inform the staff about this? I can't see any link for "Reports" or anything.
@Tunk-Fey Ariawan – thnx
nicely done !
Another way of solving this problem is to apply the trigonometric identities until you get (cos2x+1)/2 in the integral as 2014 is an even number we can consider 2x instead of 2014x and apply the limits of the integral to get pi/4 .
Log in to reply
I think the proper and easiest way of doing the sum is given in Tunk-Fey Ariawan's solution .
Yup I know...I just mentioned another way of solving it...but when I looked at this sum...the 1st thing that came up to my mind was to solve it using the most basic trigonometric identities... ;)
Anish, could you please post a solution to your problem Wire Capacitor. Thanks :)
Log in to reply
Actually, I have my AITS tommorow as well as my Birthday, so I wouldn't be able to post it tommorow, or even today (as I have to prepare). Would it be okay if I posted the solution on 24th?
Log in to reply
FIITJEE AITS? I hope so... Cool! We gotta compare ranks! :D
Log in to reply
@Rohan Rao – No, PACE AITS, sorry to disappoint you my friend.
Log in to reply
@Anish Puthuraya – Oh ok, LOL I have a FIITJEE AITS tomorrow, so...I thought you did too...XD
Absolutely fine !!! And happy birthday and all the best for your AITS !!!
Log in to reply
On that note, you are the first one to wish me! (you should be proud! just kidding) Thank you very much.
Well, I am giving both FIITJEE as well as Pace !
Log in to reply
So....how did you do in the FIITJEE paper? Personally, I found math quite difficult...how did yours go?
Log in to reply
Yeah, I got really bad marks in Maths, just 33. Chem :59. Physics:111
easy one ... first convert tan into sin cos take cos to numerator then apply property f(a+b-x) a= 0 and b=pi/2 ...then add two equations, all the sin and cos terms will cancel and then ultimately put the limits it will come pi/4 hence ans is 4... sorry for not giving a clear solution !
Every problem is easy when you know how to solve it. :)
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
In general, the integral can be solved by using the fact tan ( 2 π − x ) = cot x and ∫ a b f ( x ) d x = ∫ a b f ( a + b − x ) d x . Let I = ∫ 0 2 π 1 + tan n x d x , then I = ∫ 0 2 π 1 + tan n ( 2 π + 0 − x ) d x = ∫ 0 2 π 1 + cot n x d x = ∫ 0 2 π 1 + tan n x 1 d x = ∫ 0 2 π 1 + tan n x tan n x d x . Adding the two I 's yields 2 I I = ∫ 0 2 π 1 + tan n x 1 d x + ∫ 0 2 π 1 + tan n x tan n x d x = ∫ 0 2 π d x = 2 π = 4 π . Therefore ∫ 0 2 π 1 + tan 2 0 1 4 x d x = 4 π . Thus, p + q = 4 + 0 = 4 .
# Q . E . D . #