{ a 1 a n + 1 = 1 = b 1 = a n + b n , b n + 1 = a n + 1 + a n , n ≥ 1
Let { a k } an { b k } be sequences satisfying the above conditions.
Find the value of ⌊ 1 0 0 0 0 n → ∞ lim a n b n ⌋ .
Notation : ⌊ ⋅ ⌋ denotes the floor function .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I am noob in recursion solving. How did you solve the recursion?
Log in to reply
Look for solutions of the form a n = u n . To be a solution, we must have u 2 − 2 u − 1 = 0 , giving us two values for u , namely 1 ± 2 . Find constants c , d such that a n = c ( 1 + 2 ) n + d ( 1 − 2 ) n gives the right values for n = 1 , 2 , and we are done.
[Partial solution]
The table shows the first values of
a
n
and
b
n
.
It is interesting to note that 2 a n 2 = b n 2 + ( − 1 ) n − 1 . For example: 2 a 3 2 = 2 ( 2 5 ) = 5 0 = 7 2 + 1 = b 3 2 + 1 . Hence 2 a n 2 ≈ b n 2 . So a n b n ≈ 2 . Finally ⌊ 1 0 0 0 0 n → ∞ lim a n b n ⌋ = 1 0 0 0 0 2 = 1 4 1 4 2 .
Sir please see my solution
We can write [ a n + 1 b n + 1 ] = [ 1 2 1 1 ] [ a n b n ] . The eigenvalues of the matrix are 1 ± 2 , and an eigenvector associated with the dominant eigenvalue 1 + 2 is [ a b ] = [ 1 2 ] . Thus lim n → ∞ a n b n = a b = 2 ≈ 1 . 4 1 4 2 and the answer is 1 4 1 4 2 .
It is interesting to note that the answer is independent of the initial values as long as b 1 = − 2 a 1 .
Sir, Please review my solution and point any mistakes...
First, see that both sequence are increasing and
L = n → ∞ lim a n b n = n → ∞ lim a n + 1 b n + 1
Now the fun part
L = n → ∞ lim a n + 1 b n + 1 = n → ∞ lim a n + b n 2 a n + b n = n → ∞ lim ( 1 + 1 + a n b n 1 )
Ha...
L = 1 + L + 1 1 ⇒ L 2 − 1 = 1 ⇒ L = 2 ⌊ 1 0 0 0 0 × L ⌋ = 1 4 1 4 2
Interesting! But how do we know that lim n → ∞ a n b n exists in the first place?
Log in to reply
Because the answer was to be integer?? But on paper, if writing the whole solution was to be subjective then the question raised by you, sir, was very valid. So, how do we actually prove it? Plus, How were you able to see it???
Log in to reply
The problem can be done elegantly with linear algebra, as I try to show in my solution. Does it make sense?
Log in to reply
@Otto Bretscher – Yeah! I was able to understand now. Thanks!
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
We note that a n + 1 = 2 a n + a n − 1 with a 1 = 1 , a 2 = 2 . Solving this recurrence relation, we obtain a n = 2 2 1 [ ( 1 + 2 ) n − ( 1 − 2 ) n ] and hence b n = a n + 1 − a n = 2 1 [ ( 1 + 2 ) n + ( 1 − 2 ) n ] and hence a n b n = 2 1 − u n 1 + u n where u = 1 + 2 1 − 2 Since − 1 < u < 0 , we deduce that n → ∞ lim a n b n = 2 making the desired answer ⌊ 1 0 0 0 0 2 ⌋ = 1 4 1 4 2 .
It is worth noting that 2 a n 2 − b 2 = 4 1 [ ( ( 1 + 2 ) n − ( 1 − 2 ) n ) n − ( ( 1 + 2 ) n + ( 1 − 2 ) n ) n ] = − ( 1 + 2 ) n ( 1 − 2 ) n = ( − 1 ) n + 1 as noted by @Chan Lye Lee . For that matter, 2 a n + 1 2 − b n + 1 2 = 2 ( a n + b n ) 2 − ( 2 a n + b n ) 2 = b n 2 − 2 a n 2 and so the fact that 2 a n 2 − b n 2 = ( − 1 ) n + 1 is a simple induction.