Equation 1 : Equation 2 : ⌊ x ⌋ + ⌊ 2 x ⌋ + ⌊ 4 x ⌋ = 1 3 ⌊ x ⌋ + ⌊ 2 x ⌋ + ⌊ 4 x ⌋ + ⌊ 8 x ⌋ = 1 3
Do the equations above have real solutions?
Notation : ⌊ ⋅ ⌋ denotes the floor function .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Good clear solution. How can we describe the range of the function ⌊ x ⌋ + ⌊ 2 x ⌋ + ⌊ 4 x ⌋ ?
Nice solution!
How can we describe the range of the function ⌊ x ⌋ + ⌊ 2 x ⌋ + ⌊ 4 x ⌋ ?
Log in to reply
The word that comes to mind is "discontinuous". As x approaches an integer it does a sudden jump at every transition. At 2.999 the value is 18: when x hits 3 it suddenly jumps to 21, bypassing 19 and 20. At x = 9.999 the value is 67: when x hits 10 the value jumps to 70, bypassing 68 and 69. And so on.
Log in to reply
More accurately, what is the range of integer values that the function ⌊ x ⌋ + ⌊ 2 x ⌋ + ⌊ 4 x ⌋ can take on?
E.g. Can it be 1000? 2016? Why, or why not? What is a necessary and sufficient condition?
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – the value can be any integer that is 0, 1, 3, or 4 (mod 7)
Log in to reply
@Denton Young – Great! That is indeed the classification.
Can you explain why?
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – The equation "resets" mod 7 every time we hit a new integer (if x is an integer, the value is 7x.) So we only need to consider what happens as x goes from 0 to 1. At 0, the value is 0. when x hits 1/4, the value jumps to 1. Then when x hits 1/2, both the second and third terms increase, so the value goes to 3. When x hits 3/4, the value of the third term jumps by 1, so the value goes to 4.and when x hits 1, all three terms jump, putting us at 7 and "resetting" the function.
If we subtract Equation 1 from Equation 2 , we get ⌊ ( 8 x ) ⌋ = 0 . This means that 0 . 1 2 5 ≥ x ≥ 0 . If we plug in the maximum value of 0 . 1 2 5 into both equations, then the final result is 0 instead of 1 3 . Thus, there are no solutions.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
For equation 1 :
Let us start bounding the range of x first.
If x ≥ 2 , then ⌊ x ⌋ + ⌊ 2 x ⌋ + ⌊ 4 x ⌋ ≥ 2 + 4 + 8 = 1 4 , which is already larger than 13, thus x has to be less than 2.
If x < 2 , then the maximum value of ⌊ x ⌋ , ⌊ 2 x ⌋ , ⌊ 4 x ⌋ is at most 1, 3 and 7 respectively and thus the maximum value of these three terms is ⌊ x ⌋ + ⌊ 2 x ⌋ + ⌊ 4 x ⌋ ≤ 1 + 3 + 7 = 1 1 , which is already less than 13, thus x has to be larger than 2.
But the above tells us these intervals x ≥ 2 and x < 2 are not solutions for x . So there is no solution of x .
Similarly, For equation 2 :
Let us start bounding the range of x first.
If x ≥ 1 , then ⌊ x ⌋ + ⌊ 2 x ⌋ + ⌊ 4 x ⌋ + ⌊ 8 x ⌋ ≥ 1 + 2 + 4 + 8 = 1 5 , which is already larger than 13, thus x has to be less than 1.
If x < 1 , then the maximum value of ⌊ x ⌋ , ⌊ 2 x ⌋ , ⌊ 4 x ⌋ , ⌊ 8 x ⌋ is at most 0, 1, 3 and 7 respectively and thus the maximum value of these three terms is ⌊ x ⌋ + ⌊ 2 x ⌋ + ⌊ 4 x ⌋ + ⌊ 8 x ⌋ ≤ 0 + 1 + 3 + 7 = 1 1 , which is already less than 13, thus x has to be larger than 1.
But the above tells us these intervals x ≥ 2 and x < 2 are not solutions for x . So there is no solution of x .