Floor Functions With Unlucky 13

Algebra Level 5

Equation 1 : x + 2 x + 4 x = 13 Equation 2 : x + 2 x + 4 x + 8 x = 13 \begin{aligned} \text{ Equation 1 }: &&\quad \lfloor x \rfloor + \lfloor 2 x \rfloor + \lfloor 4x \rfloor = 13 \\ \text{ Equation 2 }: &&\quad \lfloor x \rfloor + \lfloor 2 x \rfloor + \lfloor 4x \rfloor+ \lfloor 8x \rfloor = 13 \end{aligned}

Do the equations above have real solutions?

Notation : \lfloor \cdot \rfloor denotes the floor function .

1: No, 2: No 1: Yes, 2: No 1: Yes, 2: Yes 1: No, 2: Yes

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Denton Young
Feb 21, 2016

For equation 1 :

Let us start bounding the range of x x first.

If x 2 x \geq 2 , then x + 2 x + 4 x 2 + 4 + 8 = 14 \lfloor x \rfloor + \lfloor 2 x \rfloor + \lfloor 4x \rfloor \geq 2 +4 + 8 = 14 , which is already larger than 13, thus x x has to be less than 2.

If x < 2 x < 2 , then the maximum value of x , 2 x , 4 x \lfloor x \rfloor , \lfloor 2 x \rfloor , \lfloor 4x \rfloor is at most 1, 3 and 7 respectively and thus the maximum value of these three terms is x + 2 x + 4 x 1 + 3 + 7 = 11 \lfloor x \rfloor + \lfloor 2 x \rfloor + \lfloor 4x \rfloor \leq 1 + 3 + 7 = 11 , which is already less than 13, thus x x has to be larger than 2.

But the above tells us these intervals x 2 x\geq 2 and x < 2 x< 2 are not solutions for x x . So there is no solution of x x .

Similarly, For equation 2 :

Let us start bounding the range of x x first.

If x 1 x \geq 1 , then x + 2 x + 4 x + 8 x 1 + 2 + 4 + 8 = 15 \lfloor x \rfloor + \lfloor 2 x \rfloor + \lfloor 4x \rfloor+ \lfloor 8x \rfloor \geq 1+2 +4 + 8 = 15 , which is already larger than 13, thus x x has to be less than 1.

If x < 1 x < 1 , then the maximum value of x , 2 x , 4 x , 8 x \lfloor x \rfloor , \lfloor 2 x \rfloor , \lfloor 4x \rfloor , \lfloor 8x \rfloor is at most 0, 1, 3 and 7 respectively and thus the maximum value of these three terms is x + 2 x + 4 x + 8 x 0 + 1 + 3 + 7 = 11 \lfloor x \rfloor + \lfloor 2 x \rfloor + \lfloor 4x \rfloor + \lfloor 8x \rfloor \leq 0 +1+ 3 + 7 = 11 , which is already less than 13, thus x x has to be larger than 1.

But the above tells us these intervals x 2 x\geq 2 and x < 2 x< 2 are not solutions for x x . So there is no solution of x x .

Moderator note:

Good clear solution. How can we describe the range of the function x + 2 x + 4 x \lfloor x \rfloor + \lfloor 2 x \rfloor + \lfloor 4x \rfloor ?

Nice solution!

Akhash Raja Raam - 5 years, 3 months ago

How can we describe the range of the function x + 2 x + 4 x \lfloor x \rfloor + \lfloor 2 x \rfloor + \lfloor 4x \rfloor ?

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

The word that comes to mind is "discontinuous". As x approaches an integer it does a sudden jump at every transition. At 2.999 the value is 18: when x hits 3 it suddenly jumps to 21, bypassing 19 and 20. At x = 9.999 the value is 67: when x hits 10 the value jumps to 70, bypassing 68 and 69. And so on.

Denton Young - 5 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

More accurately, what is the range of integer values that the function x + 2 x + 4 x \lfloor x \rfloor + \lfloor 2 x \rfloor + \lfloor 4x \rfloor can take on?

E.g. Can it be 1000? 2016? Why, or why not? What is a necessary and sufficient condition?

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

@Calvin Lin the value can be any integer that is 0, 1, 3, or 4 (mod 7)

Denton Young - 5 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

@Denton Young Great! That is indeed the classification.

Can you explain why?

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

@Calvin Lin The equation "resets" mod 7 every time we hit a new integer (if x is an integer, the value is 7x.) So we only need to consider what happens as x goes from 0 to 1. At 0, the value is 0. when x hits 1/4, the value jumps to 1. Then when x hits 1/2, both the second and third terms increase, so the value goes to 3. When x hits 3/4, the value of the third term jumps by 1, so the value goes to 4.and when x hits 1, all three terms jump, putting us at 7 and "resetting" the function.

Denton Young - 5 years, 3 months ago
Yashas Ravi
Sep 24, 2019

If we subtract Equation 1 1 from Equation 2 2 , we get ( 8 x ) = 0 \lfloor(8x)\rfloor=0 . This means that 0.125 x 0 0.125≥x≥0 . If we plug in the maximum value of 0.125 0.125 into both equations, then the final result is 0 0 instead of 13 13 . Thus, there are no solutions.

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...