f ( x + y ) = f ( x ) + 2 x y + f ( y )
Let f : Q → R be a function defined on the set of all rational numbers Q satisfying the above functional equation for all x , y ∈ Q and where f ( 1 ) = 2 0 1 5 . Submit the value of f ( 2 0 . 1 5 ) upto three correct places of decimals as your answer.
Bonus : Generalize f ( x ) .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Can you generalize f ( x ) ?
Log in to reply
Functions of the form x 2 + c x (is that what you mean?)
Log in to reply
Yes. Generalize f ( x ) satisfying the above function. And add it in your solution :)
Log in to reply
@Satyajit Mohanty – Is f ( x ) = x 2 + 2 0 1 4 x ?
@Satyajit Mohanty – If that is the generalized function, then why is it stated that the function is defined mapping the rational numbers to the real numbers? Wouldn't that function be valid for all real input?
f ( n x ) = f ( x ) + 2 x 2 ( n − 1 ) + f ( ( n − 1 ) x ) = f ( x ) + 2 x 2 ( n − 1 ) + f ( x ) + 2 x 2 ( n − 2 ) + f ( ( n − 2 ) x ) = n f ( x ) + 2 x 2 ( ( n − 1 ) + ( n − 2 ) + . . . . + 1 ) f ( n x ) = n f ( x ) + 2 x 2 × 2 n ( n − 1 ) = n f ( x ) + x 2 n ( n − 1 ) put x=1, f ( n ) = 2 0 1 5 n + n ( n − 1 ) = n 2 + 2 0 1 4 n f ( 2 0 . 1 5 ) = 2 0 . 1 5 ⋅ 2 0 1 5 + 2 0 . 1 5 ⋅ 1 9 . 1 5 ≈ 4 0 9 8 8 . 1 2 2
f ( x + y ) = f ( x ) + 2 x y + f ( y ) , f ( 1 ) = 2 0 1 5
f ( x + x ) = 2 f ( x ) + 2 x 2
When x = 1, we get value of f(2)
When x = 2, we get value of f(4) and so on.
f ( 1 6 + 4 ) = f ( 2 0 ) = 4 0 6 8 0
f ( 0 . 5 + 0 . 5 ) = f ( 1 ) , f ( 0 . 2 5 + 0 . 2 5 ) = f ( 0 . 5 )
This way we get value of f ( 0 . 2 5 + 0 . 5 ) = f ( 0 . 7 5 )
f ( 5 x ) = f ( x ) + f ( 4 x ) + 8 x 2 = 5 f ( x ) + 2 0 x 2 (Repeat for f(4x) and so on.)
That is how we get value of f(0.15) = 302.1225 (5x = 0.75)
f ( 2 0 + 0 . 1 5 ) = f ( 2 0 . 1 5 ) ≈ 4 0 9 8 8 . 1 2 2
You should explain that you are using Induction to prove the third statement. And in particular, the induction proof only holds for being an integer. Thus , you haven't proved it for all real values, but only for all integer values thus far.
I'm sorry, but I got lost, could you please explain how you got from your second line to your third line? i don't see where the ( x + n ) ( x + m ) or 2 0 1 5 x terms came from.
Log in to reply
f ( x + 1 ) = f ( x ) + 2 x + 2 0 1 5
Therefore when 1 is added to the value of x, 2x + 2015 is added to the value of f(x). f(x) grows by 2015 every time 1 is added to x so there must be 2015x. f(x) grows by 2x every time 1 is added to x so there must be a 2nd degree polynomial, but we don't know which polynomial it is yet. Using f(0) = 0 and f(1) = 2015, we find that the polynomial is x^2 - x = x(x-1). f(x) = x(x-1) + 2015x (= x(x+2014)) and f(x) satisfies all of the conditions so it must be right.
Log in to reply
You should explain that you are using Induction to prove the third statement. And in particular, the induction proof only holds for x being an integer. Thus , you haven't proved it for all real values, but only for all integer values thus far.
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – Is the new solution better?
Log in to reply
@Jesse Nieminen – Yes, this now works as you deal explicitly with the 0 . 1 5 . It would be slightly better to work out what f ( n x ) is in terms of f ( x ) , and use it to calculate f ( 1 ) ⇒ f ( 0 . 0 5 ) ⇒ f ( 0 . 1 5 ) .
Note that such an inductive approach will only work for countable sets. In particular, we would be unable to prove it for all real numbers. In your approach, you can only extend it to all rational x .
F(x) = x(x+1) + 2013x You can prove this by putting x = x-1 and y = 1
f ( x ) = x 2 + 2 0 1 4 x
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
We may rewrite the given relation as f ( x ) = x f ( 1 ) + x ( x − 1 ) . Therefore, f ( 2 0 . 1 5 ) = 2 0 . 1 5 ⋅ 2 0 1 5 + 2 0 . 1 5 ⋅ 1 9 . 1 5 ≈ 4 0 9 8 8 . 1 2 2 .