Variable density - SHM

A tank contains a special liquid of depth h 0 h_0 . The density of the liquid varies with h h measured from the bottom of the tank as

ρ = ρ 0 ( 4 3 h h 0 ) \rho=\rho_0 \left (4-\frac{3h}{h_{0}} \right )

where ρ 0 \rho_0 is a constant with appropriate demensions.

A small solid block of density 2.5 ρ 0 2.5 \rho_0 and mass m m is released from the bottom of the tank. If the block oscillates with a frequency of α g h 0 \alpha \sqrt{\dfrac{g}{h_{0}}} , where g g is the acceleration due to gravity, find α \alpha .


The answer is 0.174.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Karan Chatrath
Oct 13, 2020

Consider a cuboidal element of fluid of height δ y \delta y and cross section area δ A \delta A at a height y y above the bottom of the container. By drawing a free body diagram, one can balance all forces along the vertical direction. Let the pressure on the lower face of this element be P P and that on the upper surface be P + d P d y δ y P + \frac{dP}{dy}\delta y .

The force balance looks as such:

P δ A = ( P + d P d y δ y ) δ A + ρ δ y δ A g P\delta A = \left(P + \frac{dP}{dy}\delta y\right) \delta A + \rho \delta y \delta Ag d P d y = ρ g \implies \frac{dP}{dy} = -\rho g

Now, consider the mass to be at a distance y y above the bottom of the container. Then, by applying Newton's second law to this small mass gives the following. Consider the mass to have a cross section area of δ A m \delta A_m and length of δ y m \delta y_m .

P ( δ A m ) ( P + d P d y ( δ y m ) ) ( δ A m ) m g = m y ¨ P(\delta A_m) - \left(P + \frac{dP}{dy}(\delta y_m)\right)(\delta A_m) -mg = m\ddot{y} d P d y ( δ y m ) ( δ A m ) m g = m y ¨ \implies -\frac{dP}{dy}(\delta y_m) (\delta A_m) - mg = m\ddot{y}

m = 5 2 ρ o ( δ y m ) ( δ A m ) m = \frac{5}{2}\rho_o (\delta y_m) (\delta A_m)

Substituting all expressions and simplifying gives:

( 4 3 y h o ) g 5 2 g = 5 2 y ¨ \left(4 - \frac{3y}{h_o}\right)g - \frac{5}{2}g = \frac{5}{2}\ddot{y}

This equation represents an oscillatory motion of frequency:

ω 2 = 6 g 5 h o \omega^2 = \frac{6g}{5h_o}

@Karan Chatrath Thanks for the solution. Did you have attempted thermo problems? and from where your are revising thermodynamics?

Talulah Riley - 8 months ago

Log in to reply

I attempted them and I got my initial tries wrong. I have not got time to revise, but I think I might look back at my old copy of HC Verma, when I do.

Karan Chatrath - 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Karan Chatrath HC verma is good, but not that much. Try some more advanced books. They will directly help you in these problems.

Talulah Riley - 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Talulah Riley Okay, which one do you suggest?

Karan Chatrath - 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Karan Chatrath @Karan Chatrath ( DC Pandey Waves and Thermodynamics )or( Physics Galaxy Waves and Thermodynamics)
2nd book is more advanced.

Talulah Riley - 8 months ago

@Karan Chatrath Do you have knowledge of solving electrical circuits using phasor diagram?

Talulah Riley - 8 months ago

Log in to reply

I prefer using complex numbers instead of phasor diagrams.

Karan Chatrath - 8 months ago

@Karan Chatrath something like that lagging ?

Talulah Riley - 8 months ago

@Karan Chatrath I have a very small doubt in one question, can you help me now?

Talulah Riley - 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Okay, I will try

Karan Chatrath - 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Karan Chatrath Find the net impedance, power factor of this circuit

Talulah Riley - 8 months ago

@Karan Chatrath which is more easy complex or phasor?

Talulah Riley - 8 months ago

Log in to reply

complex is easier according to me.

Karan Chatrath - 8 months ago

In the problem that you shared, the magnitude of net impedance I found is:

Z M = ( 9000 ω ) 2 + 1600 ( 900 ω ) 2 + 1 Z_M = \sqrt{\frac{(9000\omega)^2 + 1600}{(900\omega)^2 + 1}}

Karan Chatrath - 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Karan Chatrath The answer given behind my book is in terms of phasor, now how I can convert your answer in phasor?

Talulah Riley - 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Talulah Riley Well, using complex numbers and phasors are equivalent. And there is more than one notation for a phasor. So show me the form of the answer.

Karan Chatrath - 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Karan Chatrath @Karan Chatrath modulus of impedance is 850 \sqrt{850}

Talulah Riley - 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Talulah Riley In the diagram, you did not mention frequency. So my answer is in terms of frequency.

Karan Chatrath - 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Karan Chatrath @Karan Chatrath what type of frequency you are talking about?

Talulah Riley - 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Talulah Riley Frequency of the source. You wrote V S = 900 sin ( ω t ) V_S=900\sin(\omega t) . What is ω \omega ? The capacitance is 30F if I am right and the resistances are 10 and 30 ohms.

Karan Chatrath - 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Karan Chatrath @Karan Chatrath no value of ω \omega is given.

Talulah Riley - 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Talulah Riley Then I do not know how to solve the problem. The capacitive reactance is

X C = j ω C X_C = \frac{-j}{\omega C}

Without ω \omega , I cannot calculate the impedance of the circuit. Does the problem ask for the maximum or minimum impedance over the range of all frequencies?

Karan Chatrath - 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Karan Chatrath @Karan Chatrath Yes , asking about maximum.
I am also bit confused.
Can you check and your answer and please tell me if it is coming 850 \sqrt{850} ?

Talulah Riley - 8 months ago

@Karan Chatrath The problem is resolved. It was just a nonsense of my friend. Leave it.
Now show me the method of your complex number.
And treat it as a new problem. Forget everything about past.

Talulah Riley - 8 months ago

Log in to reply

I have posted a problem on this circuit. You may try it. Hopefully, someone else will share a solution, through which you can gain some insights.

Karan Chatrath - 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Karan Chatrath Thank you so much.

Talulah Riley - 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Talulah Riley There is a very fast way to solve this problem, without any tedious calculations. Think about it.

Karan Chatrath - 8 months ago

@Karan Chatrath Are you the solver of my latest thermo problem?

Talulah Riley - 8 months ago
Chew-Seong Cheong
Oct 17, 2020

The equilibrium is established when

2.5 ρ 0 = ρ 0 ( 4 3 h h 0 ) 5 2 = 4 3 h h 0 h = h 0 2 \begin{aligned} 2.5 \rho_0 & = \rho_0 \left(4 - \frac {3h}{h_0}\right) \\ \frac 52 & = 4 - \frac {3h}{h_0} \\ \implies h & = \dfrac {h_0}2 \end{aligned}

When the block overshot h = h 0 2 h = \dfrac {h_0}2 by x x , the density of the liquid the block displaced is

ρ = ρ 0 ( 4 3 ( x + h 0 2 ) h 0 ) = 2.5 ρ 0 3 ρ 0 h 0 x \begin{aligned} \rho & = \rho_0 \left(4 - \frac {3\left(x+ \frac {h_0}2\right)}{h_0}\right) = 2.5\rho_0 - \frac {3\rho_0}{h_0}x \end{aligned}

This means that there is an restoring force of 3 ρ 0 V g h 0 x \dfrac {3\rho_0Vg}{h_0}x , where V V is the volume of the block. This must be equal to the m x ¨ m\ddot x , where x ¨ \ddot x is acceleration of the block. Then we have:

m x ¨ + 3 ρ 0 V g h 0 x = 0 Note that m = 2.5 ρ 0 V 2.5 ρ 0 V x ¨ + 3 ρ 0 V g h 0 x = 0 x ¨ + 6 g 5 h 0 x = 0 \begin{aligned} \blue m\ddot x + \frac {3\rho_0Vg}{h_0}x & = 0 & \small \blue{\text{Note that }m = 2.5\rho_0 V} \\ \blue{2.5 \rho_0V} \ddot x + \frac {3\rho_0Vg}{h_0}x & = 0 \\ \ddot{x} + \frac {6g}{5h_0}x & = 0 \end{aligned}

The frequency of oscillation is then f = 1 2 π 6 g 5 h 0 f = \dfrac 1{2\pi} \sqrt{\dfrac {6g}{5h_0}} . Therefore α = 1 2 π 6 5 0.174 \alpha = \dfrac 1{2\pi} \sqrt{\dfrac 65} \approx \boxed{0.174} .

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...