The largest length of a one-dimensional rod that can be fitted inside a cube is 6 2 1 8 7 . Find the volume of that cube.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
You need to explain why the length of the largest rod is a 3 which is the most important part of this problem.
Log in to reply
Diagonal of cube = a 2 + a 2 + a 2 = 3 a 2 = a 3 .
Done, thanks!
EASYYYYYY !!!!!
@Nihar Mahajan how can a rod be one-dimensional?
Log in to reply
It might have been a thin rod. ⌣ ¨
Log in to reply
@Samara Simha Reddy – But only a point or dot is one-dimensional. I cant image a rod which does not have length or height, then this question does not exist :/
Log in to reply
@Ashish Menon – A point is zero dimensional. A line is one dimensional.
Log in to reply
@Janardhanan Sivaramakrishnan – Let me get this straight, we see 3D objects because they have length, breadth and height. So, a rod has length and breadth and can be plotted between the x and y axis so it is 2D and a point has only configuration due to which it is one-dimensional. Any object which is 0-dimensional is nothing right?
Log in to reply
@Ashish Menon – In reality a rod is a 3D object, it has length and its ends are 2D surfaces. For the purpose of mathematics of the problem, the rod is considered as a line with the end being a point. You are mistaken in assuming that a point is one dimensional.
The key to determine dimension is the number of independent directions in which you can move within the 'space' that is being
A point has no dimension. There is no movement possible. A line has one dimension. You can move along the line. But, moving in any other direction will take you 'out' of the line. Similarly surfaces are two dimensional and so on.
Of course, in reality a zero dimensional or a 1-dimensional object cannot be seen by us.
Log in to reply
@Janardhanan Sivaramakrishnan – Ah... I get the difference what nihar means anyways it is wierd that I assumed i that way, I feel that after your explanation. Just a moment before it seemed so silly for me, now something serious thanks, :)
Magically :P
Log in to reply
@Nihar Mahajan – That was not a funny comment :P A jolly Niha should have told something more jollier that this. XD
@Nihar Mahajan – @Nihar Mahajan Help me solve this REALLY HARD Olympiad Geometry
Lol, I'd found a similar question in my 8th standard maths book.
It is evident that the longest possible one-dimensional rod that can be fitted inside a cube is equal to the length of its diagonal.
Let the side of the cube be a , then its diagonal will be 3 a , then:
d i a g o n a l = ( 2 1 8 7 ) 6 1
⟹ 3 a = ( 2 1 8 7 ) 6 1
Cubing both sides, we have:
⟹ 3 3 a 3 = [ ( 2 1 8 7 ) 6 1 ] 3
⟹ 3 3 a 3 = ( 2 1 8 7 ) 2 1
⟹ 3 3 a 3 = 2 1 8 7
⟹ a 3 = 3 3 2 1 8 7
⟹ a 3 = 3 1 × 3 2 1 8 7
⟹ a 3 = 3 1 × 3 2 1 8 7
⟹ a 3 = 3 1 × 7 2 9
⟹ a 3 = 3 1 × 2 7
⟹ a 3 = 9 ⟹ V = 9
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
The longest rod that can be fit inside a cube is its diagnol which can be found by the formula a 3 for a cube of side length a .
a 3 a 3 a Volume a 3 = ( 3 3 2 ) 3 = 6 2 1 8 7 = 6 7 2 9 × 3 = 3 3 × 6 3 = 3 × 6 3 = 3 2 1 × 3 6 1 = 3 3 2 = a 3 = 3 2 = 9 . 0 0