Wasted Expansion

Calculus Level 2

lim h 0 ( 1 + h ) 5 ( 1 h ) 5 h \large \lim_{h\to0} \dfrac{ (1+h)^{5} - (1-h)^{5} }h

The expansions of ( 1 + h ) 5 (1+h)^{5} and ( 1 h ) 5 (1-h)^{5} are very long. Can we find a way to evaluate the limit above without expanding and simplifying the expression? If yes, what is the value of this limit?


The answer is 10.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

5 solutions

Chung Kevin
Aug 19, 2016

Relevant wiki: Derivative by First Principle

As pointed out by Sambhrant Sachan in the solution discussion, we can evaluate this limit by applying the derivatives by first principle . That is, f ( x ) = lim h 0 f ( x + h ) f ( x ) h \displaystyle f'(x) = \lim_{h\to0}\dfrac{f(x+h) - f(x)}h .

Let f ( x ) = x 5 f(x) = x^5 , then f ( x + h ) = ( x + h ) 5 f(x+h) = (x + h)^5 and f ( x h ) = ( x h ) 5 f(x-h) = (x-h)^5 . So, f ( 1 + h ) f ( 1 h ) = ( 1 + h ) 5 ( 1 h ) 5 f(1+ h) - f(1-h) = (1+h)^5 - (1-h)^5 .

We have

lim h 0 ( 1 + h ) 5 ( 1 h ) 5 h = lim h 0 f ( 1 + h ) f ( 1 h ) h = lim h 0 ( f ( 1 + h ) f ( 1 ) ) ( f ( 1 h ) f ( 1 ) ) h = lim h 0 f ( 1 + h ) f ( 1 ) h lim h 0 f ( 1 h ) f ( 1 ) h \begin{aligned} \lim_{h\to0} \dfrac{(1+h)^5 - (1-h)^5}h &=& \lim_{h\to0} \dfrac{f(1+ h) - f(1-h)}h \\ &=& \lim_{h\to0} \dfrac{(f(1+ h) - f(1)) -( f(1-h) - f(1))}h \\ &=& \lim_{h\to0} \dfrac{f(1+h) - f(1)}h - \lim_{h\to0} \dfrac{f(1-h) - f(1)}h \\ \end{aligned}

For the second limit, we can let h = j h = -j , then lim h 0 f ( 1 h ) f ( 1 ) h = lim j 0 f ( 1 + j ) f ( 1 ) j \displaystyle \lim_{h\to0} \dfrac{f(1-h) - f(1)}h = - \lim_{j\to0} \dfrac{f(1+j) - f(1)}j .

And we can finish where we left off,

lim h 0 ( 1 + h ) 5 ( 1 h ) 5 h = lim h 0 f ( 1 + h ) f ( 1 ) h + lim j 0 f ( 1 + j ) f ( 1 ) j = lim h 0 f ( 1 + h ) f ( 1 ) h + lim h 0 f ( 1 + h ) f ( 1 ) h = 2 lim h 0 f ( 1 + h ) f ( 1 ) h = 2 f ( 1 ) = 2 ( d d x x 5 x = 1 ) = 2 5 ( 1 ) 4 = 10 . \begin{aligned} \lim_{h\to0} \dfrac{(1+h)^5 - (1-h)^5}h &=& \lim_{h\to0} \dfrac{f(1+h) - f(1)}h + \lim_{j\to0} \dfrac{f(1+j) - f(1)}j \\ &=& \lim_{h\to0} \dfrac{f(1+h) - f(1)}h + \lim_{h\to0} \dfrac{f(1+h) - f(1)}h \\ &=& 2 \lim_{h\to0} \dfrac{f(1+h) - f(1)}h \\ &=& 2 f'(1) = 2 \left( \left . \dfrac{d}{dx} x^5 \right |_{x=1} \right) = 2 \cdot 5 \cdot (1)^4 = \boxed{10} . \end{aligned}

Moderator note:

Yes, if the expansion of the expression becomes rather tedious, it would suggest that we should find other approaches. Note that f ( x ) = lim h 0 f ( x + a h ) f ( x + b h ) h ( a + b ) \displaystyle f'(x) = \lim_{h\to0} \dfrac{f(x+ah) - f(x + bh)}{h(a+b)} is also true for constants a a and b b satisfying a + b 0 a+b\ne0 .

Bonus question : For the sake of variety, can you think of another approach that doesn't use Derivative by First Principle?

I hate the L'Hopital's Rule a bit. So, I applied the following:

lim h 0 ( 1 + h ) 5 ( 1 h ) 5 h \displaystyle \lim _{ h\to0 }{ \frac { ({ 1+h) }^{ 5 }-{ (1-h) }^{ 5 } }{ h } }

= 2 × lim h 0 ( 1 + h ) 5 ( 1 h ) 5 2 h \displaystyle = 2\times \lim _{ h\to0 }{ \frac { ({ 1+h) }^{ 5 }-{ (1-h) }^{ 5 } }{ 2h } }

= 2 × lim h 0 ( 1 + h ) 5 ( 1 h ) 5 1 + h 1 + h \displaystyle = 2\times \lim _{ h\to0 }{ \frac { ({ 1+h) }^{ 5 }-{ (1-h) }^{ 5 } }{ 1+h-1+h } }

= 2 × lim h 0 ( 1 + h ) 5 ( 1 h ) 5 ( 1 + h ) ( 1 h ) \displaystyle = 2\times \lim _{ h\to0 }{ \frac { ({ 1+h) }^{ 5 }-{ (1-h) }^{ 5 } }{ (1+h)-(1-h) } }

Observe that h 0 1 + h 1 h \rightarrow 0 \implies 1+h \rightarrow 1 and h 0 1 h 1 -h \rightarrow 0 \implies 1-h \rightarrow 1 . Hence, we have 1 + h 1 h 1+h \rightarrow 1-h . Now our limit advances to:

= 2 × lim ( 1 + h ) ( 1 h ) ( 1 + h ) 5 ( 1 h ) 5 ( 1 + h ) ( 1 h ) \displaystyle = 2\times \lim _{ (1+h)\to(1-h) }{ \frac { ({ 1+h) }^{ 5 }-{ (1-h) }^{ 5 } }{ (1+h)-(1-h) } }

Recall that lim x a x n a n x a = n a n 1 \displaystyle \lim _{ x\to a }{ \frac { { x }^{ n }-{ a }^{ n } }{ x-a } } =n{ a }^{ n-1 } (You can easily prove it by bashing a little with the binomial theorem). Applying this law here with x = 1 + h x=1+h and a = 1 h a=1-h , our limit evolves to:

= 2 × 5 ( 1 h ) 4 = 2 \times 5(1-h)^{4}

Recall that h h was approaching 0 0 . Hence substituting it in the limit our answer comes 10 \boxed{10} .

Yup! This is the detailed explanation for the L Hopital approach! Thank youuu

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

But I didn't use the L'Hopital's Rule. I've said that I've a certain hatred towards it. It does not let us nurture our algebraic skills.

Arkajyoti Banerjee - 4 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Oh sorry, I misread your comment.

By the way, I don't think (1+h) -> (1-h) is a correct terminology to use. Have you seen this somewhere else before?

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

@Pi Han Goh Well, then see this:

Since h 0 h \to 0 ,

Then, 2 h 2 × 0 2 h 0 \implies 2h \to 2 \times 0 \implies 2h \to 0

Subsequently, h + h 0 h h \implies h+h \to 0 \implies h \to -h

Finally, we have 1 + h 1 h \implies \boxed{1+h \to 1-h}

And yes, I've seen this step in many math textbooks.

Arkajyoti Banerjee - 4 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

@Arkajyoti Banerjee Well the problem is, if we have h 2 3 h^2 \to 3 , does it mean that h 3 h\to \sqrt3 and/or h 3 h\to -\sqrt3 ?

Just out of curiousity: What math textbooks have you seen this in?

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

@Pi Han Goh Obviously it would approach both. See this:

While x 2 x^2 is approaching 3 3 , x x is approaching both 3 \sqrt{3} and 3 -\sqrt{3} .

Well, I don't recall in which textbooks I've noticed it, but I do remember one of the statements:

"If x 0 x \to 0 , then sin x sin 0 sin x 0 \sin x \to \sin 0 \implies \sin x \to 0 . Combining these two, we can assert that sin x x \sin x \to x ."

When I saw it for the first time, I was bewildered a bit. Then I thought about it practically and experimented with some graphs. Then I understood that these transformations must make sense, what do you say?

Arkajyoti Banerjee - 4 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

@Arkajyoti Banerjee No, that's not correct. if x>0+ or if x>0-, then the limit may turn out to be different.

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

@Pi Han Goh Well, but it is correct when LHL=RHL.

This limit satisfies LHL=RHL, so I applied this.

Arkajyoti Banerjee - 4 years, 9 months ago
Ayush Choubey
Aug 15, 2016

Since it's a 0/0 form:

We can use L'Hopital Rule... By differentiating the numerator and putting h=0, numerator =10 and denominator =1

HENCE ANSWER = 10

Yup. That's the standard approach. For the sake of variety, can you think of another approach?

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

The Above expression is similar to this form : f ( x ) = lim h 0 f ( x + h ) f ( x ) h Equation 1 f ( x ) = lim h 0 f ( x h ) f ( x ) h Equation 2 Add the two equations to get : 2 f ( x ) = lim h 0 f ( x + h ) f ( x h ) h The question is basically asking the derivative of 2 x 5 at x = 1 Which is equal to 10 \text{The Above expression is similar to this form : } \\ f^{'}(x)=\displaystyle\lim_{h \to 0} \dfrac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h} \quad \quad \text{Equation 1} \\ f^{'}(x)=\displaystyle\lim_{h \to 0} \dfrac{f(x-h)-f(x)}{-h} \quad \quad \text{Equation 2} \\ \text{Add the two equations to get :} \\ 2f^{'}(x)=\displaystyle\lim_{h \to 0} \dfrac{f(x+h)-f(x-h)}{h} \\ \text{The question is basically asking the derivative of } 2x^5 \text{ at } x=1 \\ \text{Which is equal to } 10

Sabhrant Sachan - 4 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

Great!!! =D =D

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 10 months ago
Richard Costen
Aug 24, 2016

A different solution from First Principles is to factor the expression, using the fact that x 5 y 5 = ( x y ) ( x 4 + x 3 y + x 2 y 2 + x y 3 + y 4 ) x^5-y^5=(x-y)(x^4+x^3y+x^2y^2+xy^3+y^4) lim h 0 ( 1 + h ) 5 ( 1 h ) 5 h = lim h 0 [ ( 1 + h ) ( 1 h ) ] [ ( 1 + h ) 4 + ( 1 + h ) 3 ( 1 h ) + . . . + ( 1 h ) 4 ] h = lim h 0 2 h [ ( 1 + h ) 4 + . . . ] h (cancel monomial $h$ on top and bottom, & then substitute zero for $h$) = 2 [ 1 4 + 1 3 × 1 + 1 2 × 1 2 + 1 × 1 3 + 1 4 ] = 2 × 5 = 10 \begin{aligned} \lim_{h\to0} \dfrac{ (1+h)^{5} - (1-h)^{5} }h & = \lim_{h\to0} \dfrac{[(1+h)-(1-h)][(1+h)^4+(1+h)^3(1-h)+...+(1-h)^4]}h \\ & = \lim_{h\to0} \dfrac{2h[(1+h)^4+ ... ]}h \\ \text{(cancel monomial \$h\$ on top and bottom, \& then substitute zero for \$h\$)} \\ & = 2[1^4+1^3\times 1 +1^2\times{1^2}+1 \times{1^3}+ 1^4] \\ & = 2\times 5 = \boxed{10} \end{aligned}

Correcttttttttt!!!

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 9 months ago

the best method to do this would be using binomial theorm as h<<<1 ( as h-> 0) it would be 1-5h

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...