2 3 2 4 2 5 2 ⋯
Let the value of the above expression be denoted by I . Find ⌊ 1 0 0 0 I ⌋ .
Details and Assumptions:
You may use a scientific calculator to evaluate the final result.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
this question and your solution increased my knowlede, thanks for sharing knowledge.
After a lot struggling to find the answer , I am really delighted by ur solution @Micah Wood
amazing, tks!
Log in to reply
@Micah Wood , Nice solution, but it would help if you would derive the sum to be e − 2 for most of the users. Thanks!:)
Log in to reply
I'll give you a clue, consider the taylor series of e x and set x = 1 .
Log in to reply
@Julian Poon – Haha...Thanks @Julian Poon , i knew the derivation! I was just saying that it would be important for someone who doesn't:D
Log in to reply
@A Former Brilliant Member – Oh....
Yeah, I agree with you. It's kinda important.
@Micah Wood really amazing........you are genius "Micah Wood"
Beautiful... (removes tear from corner of eye)
This is amazing. Solutions like this exemplify why I love mathematics. Thank you
Can you elaborate how you obtained 2 2 1 ( 1 + 3 1 ( 1 + 4 1 ( 1 + 5 1 ( 1 + ⋯ ) ) ) ) from 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 ⋯ ??
Log in to reply
2 2 2 3 2 . . . = 2 2 1 ⋅ 2 2 1 ⋅ 3 1 ⋅ 2 2 1 ⋅ 3 1 ⋅ 4 1 . . . = 2 2 ! 1 ⋅ 2 3 ! 1 ⋅ 2 4 ! 1 . . . = 2 2 ! 1 + 3 ! 1 + 4 ! 1 . . .
Didn't think of nesting in this way can be simplified. This is a very good "question and answer".
Same way!!
Please forgive my ignorance, but shouldn’t the solution equal 1000 because e = 2 mathematicly, therefore 2 to the e – 2 power would be the same as 2 to the 0 power. Then I would equal 1 and 1000I would equal 1000. That’s how I solved it after I got the equation with the denominator factorially increasing in value.
Log in to reply
No, the value of e is approximately 2.71828 . My solution relies on the knowledge of Taylor series of e x at x = 1 .
Totally over my head :-)
i've done the same, we are great!
same solution (y) :)
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
x 3 x 4 x 5 x ⋯ can be rewritten as
x 2 1 ( 1 + 3 1 ( 1 + 4 1 ( 1 + 5 1 ( 1 + ⋯ ) ) ) ) = x 2 ! 1 + 3 ! 1 + 4 ! 1 + 5 ! 1 + ⋯ = x e − 2
since e = 1 + 1 ! 1 + 2 ! 1 + 3 ! 1 + 4 ! 1 + ⋯ .
Let x = 2 and we have I = 2 e − 2 = 1 . 6 4 5 2 …
So we have ⌊ 1 0 0 0 I ⌋ = 1 6 4 5