True or false :
r ( cos θ + i sin θ ) = r ( cos ( 2 θ ) + i sin ( 2 θ ) )
where r > 0 .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Relevant wiki: De Moivre's Theorem
LHS = r e i 2 θ = RHS .
As De-Moivre's theorem states : c o s θ + i s i n θ = e i θ
With complex exponentiation, we have to be careful with the values that we're picking. The equality refers to "one of these set of values is equal to one of these set of values". If we picked particular values, then they might not be equal.
That isn't De Moivre's theorem, its Euler's Formula . Also you cannot apply De Moivre's theorem here since its applicable only if the index is an integer :3
Log in to reply
I've got a doubt about De Moivre's Theorem. Why can't you apply it for non integer numbers? I tried to prove this theorem by taking Euler's Formula this way: e i x = c i s ( x ) ( e i x ) k = ( c i s ( x ) ) k e i ( k x ) = ( c i s ( x ) ) k c i s ( k x ) = ( c i s ( x ) ) k For any real k .....
Log in to reply
Hjalmar, my guess is that non-integer exponentiation of iota would be a messy affair. Also compare your proof with the proof here: https://goo.gl/OXMZUq. You'll find that the exponentiation law used is for integer powers. Your question demands a better answer, and I too am looking forward to one.
Log in to reply
@Arjun Bahuguna – The exponention law must be on integers when we are talking about real numbers, with complex it doesn't matter, realize that that's the only fact that may make a mistake for non integer numbers... that's what I think
Yeah Mistake. euler's formulae. If the index is rational i.e. not an integer, then one of the values is this.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
For r = 1 and θ = 2 π , r ( cos θ + i sin θ ) = 1 = 1 , but r ( cos 2 θ + i sin 2 θ ) = − 1 .