Which Area is the Largest?

Geometry Level 1

The segments dividing this triangle are parallel to the triangle's base.

Which colored area is the largest?

Orange Blue Red Can’t be determined

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

17 solutions

We can count the number of smaller triangular tiles, each one has the same area, so the section with more tiles is the largest

this triangle is just a case from many, they're many triangles with the same height (6).

SALDEZ Zak - 2 years, 9 months ago

Playing around... I used Cavalieri's principle to make a right triangle I used Cavalieri's principle to make a right triangle

Uros Stojkovic - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

You should add this as your own solution.

Jason Dyer Staff - 2 years, 9 months ago

Excellent and succinct solution. I based my answer on the blue segment being the closest in shape to a square, thus likely to have a larger area than either the wide but shallow red trapezoid or the tall but narrow orange triangle.

Thomas Sutcliffe - 2 years, 9 months ago

It doesn't say that 2 is twice 1 and that 3 is three times. They are not given as measurements, but just segments. Misleading puzzle.

Irwin Price - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

The fact that the numbers 1, 2 and 3 appear with double ended arrows next to them makes it absolutely clear that they are intended as measurements. Without those numbers being measurements the question becomes a matter of guesswork. With them one can work out the answer in various different ways. The solution on which you posted this comment happens to be a particularly good one.

Thomas Sutcliffe - 2 years, 9 months ago

+1 Irwin Price. Totally agree.

Neil Gabbart - 2 years, 9 months ago

Jose - Smart & Simple Solution!

Bob Zabala - 2 years, 9 months ago

Beautiful answer

Abha Vishwakarma - 2 years, 9 months ago

Amazing answer! Not always we need complicated equations to determine somethings!

Rafael Ferreira - 2 years, 9 months ago

They are similar triangles so the ratio of

Orange : Orange + Blue : Orange + Blue + Red = 3^2 ; 5^2 : 6^2 = 9 : 25 : 36

So Blue = 25 - 9 = 16 and Red = 36 - 25 = 11

Therefore Area Orange : Blue : Red = 9 : 16 : 11 so blue is biggest

Vivian James - 2 years, 4 months ago
Arjen Vreugdenhil
Aug 19, 2018

The diagram shows three similar triangles, of heights 3, 5, and 6 respectively. Their areas are proportional to the heights; thus we have A 1 : A 2 : A 3 = 3 2 : 5 2 : 6 2 = 9 : 25 : 36. A_1 : A_2 : A_3 = 3^2 : 5^2 : 6^2 = 9 : 25 : 36. The blue area is the difference between the second and first triangle; the red area is the difference between the third and second triangle. Thus orange : blue : red = 9 : ( 25 9 ) : ( 36 25 ) = 9 : 16 : 11. \text{orange}\ :\ \text{blue}\ :\ \text{red} = 9 : (25 - 9) : (36 - 25) = 9 : 16 : 11. Thus the orange area is smallest, the red is slightly bigger, and the blue area \boxed{\text{blue area}} is almost twice as large.


Generalization

Suppose the triangle were divided into n n trapezoidal sections, with height ratios n : ( n 1 ) : ( n 2 ) : : 2 : 1 n : (n-1) : (n-2) : \dots : 2 : 1 . Then the total area of the first k k sections would be proportional to A 1 + + A k ( n + ( n 1 ) + ( n 2 ) + + ( n k + 1 ) ) 2 = ( 1 2 n ( n + 1 ) 1 2 ( n k ) ( n k + 1 ) ) 2 = ( 1 2 ( 2 n k + 1 ) k ) 2 . \begin{aligned} A_1 + \cdots + A_k & \propto {\big(\normalsize n + (n-1) + (n-2) + \cdots + (n-k+1)\big)\normalsize}^2 \\ & = {\big(\normalsize\tfrac12n(n+1) - \tfrac12(n-k)(n-k+1)\big)\normalsize}^2 \\ & = {\big(\normalsize \tfrac12(2n-k+1)k\big)\normalsize}^2. \end{aligned} Subtracting, we get A k ( 1 2 ( 2 n k + 1 ) k ) 2 ( 1 2 ( 2 n k + 2 ) ( k 1 ) ) 2 = k 3 3 k 2 ( n + 1 ) + k ( 2 n 2 + 5 n + 3 ) ( n + 1 ) 2 . \begin{aligned} A_k & \propto {\big(\normalsize \tfrac12(2n-k+1)k\big)\normalsize}^2 - {\big(\normalsize \tfrac12(2n-k+2)(k-1)\big)\normalsize}^2 \\ & = k^3 - 3k^2(n+1) + k(2n^2 + 5n + 3) - (n+1)^2. \end{aligned} To see which of the areas A k A_k is maximal, consider the difference A k A k 1 3 k 2 3 k ( 2 n + 3 ) + ( 2 n 2 + 8 n + 7 ) = 3 ( n + 3 2 k ) 2 ( n + 1 2 ) 2 + 1 2 . \begin{aligned} A_k - A_{k-1} & \propto 3k^2 - 3k(2n+3) + (2n^2 +8 n + 7) \\ & = 3\left(n + \frac32 - k\right)^2 - \left(n+ \tfrac12\right)^2 + \tfrac 12. \end{aligned} This expression is positive for 1 k < k 0 1 \leq k < k_0 and negative for k 0 < k n k_0 < k \leq n , where k 0 = n + 3 2 ( n + 1 2 ) 2 1 2 3 . k_0 = n + \frac 32 - \sqrt{\frac{(n + \tfrac12)^2 - \tfrac12}3}. This means that A k A_k grows as long as k < k 0 k < k_0 but shrinks after that. Thus the maximum value of A k A_k is obtained for the smallest integer k k less then k 0 k_0 , i.e. A k is maximal \ k = n + 3 2 ( n + 1 2 ) 2 1 2 3 . A_k\ \text{is maximal}\ \ \ \ \Longrightarrow\ \ \ \ \ k = \left\lfloor n + \frac 32 - \sqrt{\frac{(n + \tfrac12)^2 - \tfrac12}3} \right\rfloor.

The expression for k 0 k_0 may be approximated as k 0 n + 3 2 n + 1 2 3 = ( 1 1 3 ) n + ( 3 2 1 2 3 ) 0.42265 n + 1.21132. k_0 \approx n + \tfrac 32 - \frac{n + \tfrac12}{\sqrt 3} = \left(1 - \frac 1{\sqrt 3}\right) n + \left(\frac 3 2 - \frac 1{2\sqrt 3}\right) \approx 0.42265 n + 1.21132. This means that the section with the largest area is that with index k = 0.42265 n + 1.21132 , k = \left\lfloor 0.42265 n + 1.21132 \right\rfloor,

For the situation n = 3 n = 3 in this problem, we obtain k = 2 k = 2 , which means that the second section (the blue section) is largest.

Fun generalization.

Jeremy Galvagni - 2 years, 9 months ago

doesin't the base also come into play

Gopakumar MT - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

If the old area is A = 1 2 b h A = \frac{1}{2}bh , then the new area is A new = λ 2 1 2 b h A_{\text{new}} = \lambda^2 \frac{1}{2} bh , which follows linear algebra. Here, b b and h h are the old lengths, whereas λ b \lambda b and λ h \lambda h are the new lengths.

It's very interesting how Arjen looked at heights and areas, but not the bases.

Michael Huang - 2 years, 9 months ago

In general, if (any two corresponding) linear dimensions of two similar figures are in ratio a : b a:b , then their areas have ratio a 2 : b 2 a^2:b^2 . Specific details about the shape are not needed.

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 2 years, 9 months ago

The orange and red area are not equal. Please check the calculation 36-25 which is equal to 11.

Venkatachalam J - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

'kay. Fixed it.

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 2 years, 9 months ago

Nice analysis.

Jesse Otis - 2 years, 9 months ago

Wow. Very good.

Ben Folland - 2 years, 9 months ago

Why am I not getting your generalisation?

Aryan Gupta - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Dunno. The idea is simply to add sections to the top, of relative height 4, 5, 6, and so on.

This makes for more complicated math, but it's also more fun (I think). Let me illustrate with the example n = 5 n = 5 . First, I calculated the areas of the triangles:

k A 1 + + A k = ( 1 2 ( 2 n k + 1 ) k ) 2 1 A 1 = ( 5 1 ) 2 = 25 2 A 1 + A 2 = ( 4 1 2 2 ) 2 = 81 3 A 1 + A 2 + A 3 = ( 4 3 ) 2 = 144 4 A 1 + A 2 + A 3 + A 4 = ( 3 1 2 4 ) 2 = 196 5 A 1 + A 2 + A 3 + A 4 + A 5 = ( 3 5 ) 2 = 225 \begin{array}{cr} k & A_1 + \cdots + A_k = \left(\tfrac12(2n - k + 1)k\right)^2 \\ \hline 1 & A_1 = (5\cdot 1)^2 = 25 \\ 2 & A_1 + A_2 = (4\tfrac12 \cdot 2)^2 = 81 \\ 3 & A_1 + A_2 + A_3 = (4\cdot 3)^2 = 144 \\ 4 & A_1 + A_2 + A_3 + A_4 = (3\tfrac12\cdot 4)^2 = 196 \\ 5 & A_1 + A_2 + A_3 + A_4 + A_5 = (3\cdot 5)^2 = 225 \\ \hline \end{array}

By subtracting, I obtained the areas of the trapezoidal sections: A k = k 3 3 k 2 ( n + 1 ) + k ( 2 n 2 + 5 n + 3 ) ( n + 1 ) 2 k = k 3 18 k 2 + 78 k 36 1 25 0 = 25 = 1 18 + 78 36 2 81 25 = 56 = 8 72 + 156 36 3 144 81 = 63 = 27 162 + 234 36 4 196 144 = 52 = 64 288 + 312 36 5 225 196 = 29 = 125 450 + 390 36 \begin{array}{cc} & A_k = k^3 - 3k^2(n+1) + k(2n^2+5n+3) - (n+1)^2 \\ k & = k^3 - 18k^2 + 78k - 36 \\ \hline 1 & 25 - 0 = \boxed{25} = 1 - 18 + 78 - 36 \\ 2 & 81 - 25 = \boxed{56} = 8 - 72 + 156 - 36 \\ 3 & 144 - 81 = \boxed{63} = 27 - 162 + 234 - 36 \\ 4 & 196 - 144 = \boxed{52} = 64 - 288 + 312 - 36 \\ 5 & 225 - 196 = \boxed{29} = 125 - 450 + 390 - 36 \\ \hline \end{array} From this table we see that k = 3 k = 3 has the greatest area. This can be established "mechanically" by calculating the differences A k A k 1 = 3 ( n + 3 2 k ) 2 ( n 2 + n 1 4 ) k = 1 4 ( 3 ( 13 2 k ) 2 119 ) 2 56 25 = 31 = 1 4 ( 3 81 119 ) 3 63 56 = 7 = 1 4 ( 3 49 119 ) 4 52 63 = 11 = 1 4 ( 3 25 119 ) 5 29 52 = 23 = 1 4 ( 3 9 119 ) \begin{array}{cc} & A_k - A_{k-1} = 3(n+\tfrac32-k)^2 - (n^2 + n -\tfrac14) \\ k & = \tfrac14(3(13-2k)^2 - 119) \\ \hline 2 & 56 - 25 = \boxed{31} = \tfrac14(3\cdot 81 - 119) \\ 3 & 63 - 56 = \boxed{7} = \tfrac14(3\cdot 49 - 119) \\ 4 & 52 - 63 = \boxed{-11} = \tfrac14(3\cdot 25 - 119) \\ 5 & 29 - 52 = \boxed{-23} = \tfrac14(3\cdot 9 - 119) \\ \hline\end{array} Because the last positive value in this list occurs when k = 3 k = 3 , we know that A 3 A_3 is the largest area. We find the last positive value by determining the zero of the expression for A k A k 1 A_k - A_{k-1} , 1 4 ( 3 ( 13 2 k ) 2 119 ) = 0 k = 1 2 ( 13 119 3 ) = 3.35 , \tfrac14(3(13-2k)^2 - 119) = 0 \ \ \therefore\ \ k =\frac12\left(13-\sqrt{\frac{119}3}\right) = 3.35, so that the switch from positive to negative happens between A 3 A 2 A_3 - A_2 and A 4 A 3 A_4 - A_3 . Rounding down gives k = 3 k = 3 for the largest area. A very good linear approximation simply gives k 0.42265 5 + 1.21132 3.32 k \approx 0.42265\cdot 5 + 1.21132 \approx 3.32 which also rounds down to k = 3 k = 3 .

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 2 years, 9 months ago

Arjen -- That is beautiful; If I study it for a month I might figure it out. :-) In the first sentence under Generalization you have "Suppose the triangle were divided into n trapezoidal sections...". For this situation you stated that the value of n is 3 -- but the 'top' section (call it the nth section) is not a trapezoid -- it's a triangle. Does that matter ?

Jesse Otis - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

I think of a triangle as a degenerate trapezoid, with top base of length zero :)

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Now I will have to look up 'degenerate trapezoid'. :-)

Jesse Otis - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

@Jesse Otis Picture a trapezoid. Now imagine that one of the bases grows smaller and smaller, until eventually it hits length zero. Then it is degenerate.

In the same way, a point is a degenerate circle, a line segment a degenerate rectangle or ellipse, and so on.

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

@Arjen Vreugdenhil Thanks; I have a better idea of that now. Can a trapezoid 'degenerate' all the way into a line segment (i.e. if one base can go to zero length can the other base do so along with it) ?

Jesse Otis - 2 years, 9 months ago

( •̀∀•́ ),it's perfect~(≧▽≦)/~

李 同喜 - 2 years, 9 months ago

A hell of a long description. Since everything is proportional simply now that if the large triangle base is 6 then the next base is 5 and the little triangle base is 3. Calculate areas and the blue is the largest.

Greg Grapsas - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Just read the part above the line. The rest is a generalization to bigger triangles. If the triangle were divided into 100 parts in the same manner, calculating areas and deciding which one is larger would take a lot of work. But now that I did the work here, I can simply conclude that of the 100 pieces, the 0.42265 × 100 + 1.21132 = 42 + 1 = 43 \lfloor 0.42265 \times 100 + 1.21132 \rfloor = 42 + 1 = 43 th piece is the biggest.

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Great!!.. You are really awesome! @Arjen Vreugdenhil

Prem Chebrolu - 2 years, 9 months ago

Wonderful solution, but I was a bit stuck trying to figure out what is wrong with this similar line of reasoning.

The ratio of the areas of trapezoid with both the blue and red regions, A B + A R A_B + A_R , to the blue trapezoid, A B A_B , is,

A B + A R A B = ( 3 2 ) 2 = 9 4 , \frac{A_B + A_R}{A_B} = (\frac{3}{2})^2 = \frac{9}{4}, A R A B = 9 4 1 = 5 4 \frac{A_R}{A_B} = \frac{9}{4} - 1 = \frac{5}{4}

Therefore, A R A_R is greater than A B A_B . There must be some mistake here, but I can’t think of what it is.

Calvin Osborne - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

The ratio is not correct, because the two trapezoids you are considering are not similar.

Their height ratios are 3:2, as you correctly observe; but their bases have ratios 1:1 for the top base and 6:5 for the bottom base.

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Oh yes of course, thank you for the help!

Calvin Osborne - 2 years, 9 months ago

Is it necessary to square the heights? Are you just trying to get bigger numbers?

Anton Kaminsky - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

The reason for squaring them is that the ratio of areas of similar figures is the square of the ratio of their linear dimensions.

Consider the simple case of two squares: if their sides have ratio s 1 : s 2 = 4 : 3 s_1:s_2 = 4:3 then their areas have ratio A 1 : A 2 = s 1 2 : s 2 2 = 16 : 9 A_1:A_2 = s_1^2:s_2^2 = 16:9 . The same is true for other similar shapes; in this case, triangles.

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 2 years, 9 months ago

A more graphical way to understand this: The length of the baseline (c) is proportional to the height (h): c h c \sim h , and the area (A) proportional to the baseline and height A c h A \sim c \cdot h , then that means the area is proportional to the square of the height: A h h A \sim h \cdot h .

Frank Bitterlich - 2 years, 9 months ago

They are proportional to the heights, but the bases have different sizes, no?

Evgeny Kolev - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Yes, but the triangles are all similar. So the bases are in the same proportions as their heights.

Jeremy Galvagni - 2 years, 9 months ago
Uros Stojkovic
Aug 21, 2018

Use Cavalieri's principle to transform the given triangle to a right triangle, and then flip the triangle over to get a rectangle.

From the image below it's clear that the blue area is the greatest.

So, you are using shearing where you keep the base and height of the triangle constant so the areas of the original triangle and the right triangle are congruent.

Christine Kincaid Dewey - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Exactly and not only that -- Cavalieri's principle guarantees me that segments retain their original area too.

Uros Stojkovic - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Which one can also quickly see if we look at the formula for the area of a tringle. Base x Height / 2. => every triangle with the same base and height have the same area.

gilles colling - 2 years, 9 months ago

Flipping it makes a rhomboid, which is not a square.

Evgeny Kolev - 2 years, 9 months ago

Simple. Beautiful. I did it like Arjen and just calculated it through, but this visual proof makes it so obvious.

gilles colling - 2 years, 9 months ago
David Vreken
Aug 19, 2018

Let b 1 b_1 be the base of the red area, b 2 b_2 the base of the blue area, and b 3 b_3 the base of the orange area.

By similar triangles, b 2 3 + 2 = b 1 3 + 2 + 1 \frac{b_2}{3 + 2} = \frac{b_1}{3 + 2 + 1} , so b 2 = 5 6 b 1 b_2 = \frac{5}{6}b_1 . Also, b 3 3 = b 1 3 + 2 + 1 \frac{b_3}{3} = \frac{b_1}{3 + 2 + 1} , so b 3 = 1 2 b 1 b_3 = \frac{1}{2}b_1 .

The orange area is the orange triangle with an area of A o = 1 2 b 3 3 A_o = \frac{1}{2}b_3 \cdot 3 , and since b 3 = 1 2 b 1 b_3 = \frac{1}{2}b_1 , A o = 1 2 ( 1 2 b 1 ) 3 = 3 4 b 1 A_o = \frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{2}b_1)3 = \frac{3}{4}b_1 .

The blue area is the blue trapezoid with an area of A b = 1 2 ( b 3 + b 2 ) 2 A_b = \frac{1}{2}(b_3 + b_2)2 , and since b 2 = 5 6 b 1 b_2 = \frac{5}{6}b_1 and b 3 = 1 2 b 1 b_3 = \frac{1}{2}b_1 , A b = 1 2 ( 1 2 b 1 + 5 6 b 1 ) 2 = 4 3 b 1 A_b = \frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{2}b_1 + \frac{5}{6}b_1)2 = \frac{4}{3}b_1 .

The red area is the red trapezoid with an area of A r = 1 2 ( b 2 + b 1 ) 1 A_r = \frac{1}{2}(b_2 + b_1)1 , and since b 2 = 5 6 b 1 b_2 = \frac{5}{6}b_1 , A r = 1 2 ( 5 6 b 1 + b 1 ) 1 = 11 12 b 1 A_r = \frac{1}{2}(\frac{5}{6}b_1 + b_1)1 = \frac{11}{12}b_1 .

Since 4 3 b 1 > 11 12 b 1 > 3 4 b 1 \frac{4}{3}b_1 > \frac{11}{12}b_1 > \frac{3}{4}b_1 , the blue area has the largest area.

This one was the same that I made up. Is the most clear and precise solution. Graphical solutions are nice but more than a solution are a guide to formalize a solution.

Francisco Palm - 2 years, 9 months ago
Galvin Summer
Aug 19, 2018

this is the best solution in this discussion.

SALDEZ Zak - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Thank you.

Galvin Summer - 2 years, 9 months ago

My answer too

Teddy abou jaoude - 2 years, 9 months ago
Stephan E
Aug 20, 2018

Trapezoid area is height times average of top side and bottom side.

1x(6+5)/2=5.5 (red),

2x(5+3)/2=8 (winner),

3x(3+0)/2=4.5 (Top triangle)

Joël Ganesh
Aug 23, 2018

If we graph the triangle in the Oxy-plane, where the most left corner of the triangle is at the origin O ( 0 , 0 ) O(0, 0) and label the top of the triangle as T ( t , 1 + 2 + 3 ) = ( t , 6 ) T(t, 1+2+3)=(t, 6) and label the most right corner of the triangle as A ( a , 0 ) A(a, 0) , we will get the following: In this picture, I named the red line f ( x ) f(x) , the purple line g ( x ) g(x) and the green line is just the line y = 0 y=0 . To get to a formula for f ( x ) f(x) , we see the line goes through the origin and the point T ( t , 6 ) T(t, 6) , this implies that f ( x ) = Δ y Δ x x = 6 0 t 0 x = 6 x t f(x)= \frac{\Delta y }{\Delta x} \cdot x = \frac{6-0}{t-0} \cdot x = \frac{6x}{t} . With the same strategy in mind, we can find that g ( x ) = 6 ( x t ) a t + 6 g(x)= \frac{-6(x-t)}{a-t} + 6

Now we want to find the coordinates of the intersections of f ( x ) f(x) and g ( x ) g(x) with the lines y = 1 y=1 and y = 1 + 2 = 3 y=1+2=3 , so we want to know the values of x that saturate the equations f ( x ) = 1 , g ( x ) = 1 , f ( x ) = 3 f(x)=1, g(x)=1, f(x)=3 and g ( x ) = 3 g(x)=3 . Isolating x in the 4 equations, will give us f ( a 6 ) = 1 , g ( t 6 + 5 a 6 ) = 1 , f ( t 2 ) = 3 f(\frac{a}{6})=1, g(\frac{t}{6}+\frac{5a}{6})=1, f(\frac{t}{2})=3 and g ( t 2 + a 2 ) = 3 g(\frac{t}{2}+\frac{a}{2})=3 .

With this information it is clear that the line y = 1 y=1 between the two intersections has a length of 5 a 6 \frac{5a}{6} and that the line y = 3 y=3 has a length of a 2 \frac{a}{2} . This implies firstly that the red area is equal to a + 5 a 6 2 1 = 11 a 12 \frac{a+\frac{5a}{6}}{2} \cdot 1=\frac{11a}{12} , secondly that the blue area is equal to 5 a 6 + a 2 2 2 = 8 a 6 \frac{\frac{5a}{6}+\frac{a}{2}}{2} \cdot 2 = \frac{8a}{6} and at last that the yellow area is equal to a 2 2 3 = 3 a 4 \frac{\frac{a}{2}}{2} \cdot 3 = \frac{3a}{4} . Because a is strictly positive, the blue area is the biggest. So, B l u e \boxed{Blue} is the right answer.

Gabor Koranyi
Aug 20, 2018

Let the base of the big triangel be a. Then the area of the big triangel is T=a 6/2=3a. The area of the similar orange triangel is O=(1/2) (a/2) 3=(9/12) a; the orange and the blue together O+B=1/2 (5/6) a 5=(25/12) a hence B=(16/12) a. The red area R=T-(B+O)=3a-(25/12) a=(11/12)*a. B is largest.

Gopakumar Mt
Aug 19, 2018

draw a perpendicular through the triangle which will be of 6 units. then we will have two pairs of three similar triangles( both will have the height as a side).as they are similar, the ratio of heights and bases will be the same. calculate the areas of each color in the two triangles(we divided it into two with the height) then observe.BLUE HAS MAX AREA.

Nahyan Aijaz
Aug 19, 2018

As you can see in the diagram above, the triangle is separated into 3 sections. Now, if you consider the base of each individual section as the value a then you can easily see, even at first glance, that placing each section through it's corresponding shape's area equation would place the parallelogram with height '1' to be the one with the one having the least area; hence having the colored area which is the smallest. So this eliminates the bottom section.

Now we are left with the two larger sections above. The one with height '2' being a parallelogram as well and the top most section with height '3' being a triangle. Now if you want to give values to the upper and lower horizontal lines for the parallelogram, do that at your own risk because every value is not suitable for every side of every shape. But if you need to do that at any cost, then please figure out the ratios of both these lines before giving ANY values to them.

Now looking at the figure, the triangle being at the top, has the smallest base which can also be imagined as 1/3 a , therefore it is smaller than the parallelogram which can have an imagined base of 1/2 a . But since the parallelogram is a quadrilateral it will always have an area that is greater than a triangle of equal size. So there is really no need to look at the base at all. For example a triangle of size 1x1 or 2x2 would have less area when compared to a quadrilateral of size 1x1x1 or 2x2x2, and since the triangle is already smaller than the parallelogram there is no possible way for it to have a greater colored area than the parallelogram. In either case the middle section has a greater area than the bottom or top section, which comes to the conclusion that it is the largest colored area within the large triangle.

Except the parallelogram with height '1' does NOT have the least area. And the triangle has height 3, which is NOT "already smaller" than the parallelogram of height '2'... -.-

C . - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

That might be true, but did you consider that I am a teenager.

Nahyan Aijaz - 2 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

I'm sorry that i haven't, but this still should not be an excuse for using incorrect terms and invalid reasoning...

Specifically, can you please try to not use the term "parallelogram" for trapezoids/trapeziums? A parallelogram is a quadrilateral with two PAIRS of parallel sides. Meaning both pairs of opposing sides need to be parallel.

C . - 2 years, 8 months ago

Let b b represent the base length of the triangle. Now imagine two points starting at either side of the base and moving inward at different rates so that the height from both points straight up to the sides of the triangle is always the same. These points can move inward until they meet beneath the top vertex, where the maximum height is reached. Call the combined movement inward by both points x x , and the height of the triangle's sides directly above both points after this movement y y . These are related by a constant ratio since the sides of the triangle have constant slope. When the points meet beneath the top vertex, their combined movement is equal to the base length, b b , and the height above them is 6, since this is the height of the vertex above the base according to the diagram. So, the constant ratio x y \frac{x}{y} is b 6 \frac{b}{6} . Thus, x = b 6 y x = \frac{b}{6}y . Using this fact, when y = 1 y = 1 (top of the red region), x = b 6 x = \frac{b}{6} , while when y = 3 y = 3 (top of the blue region), x = b 2 x = \frac{b}{2} . The new base length at a given height is equal to b x b - x , since x x is the distance moved inward, so b 1 = 5 6 b b_1 = \frac{5}{6}b and b 3 = b 2 b_3 = \frac{b}{2} , where b 1 b_1 and b 3 b_3 denote the base lengths at y = 1 y = 1 and y = 3 y = 3 , respectively. Using the triangle area formula A = 1 2 b h A = \frac{1}{2}bh , the total area of the triangle ( A 0 A_0 ) as well as the areas from y = 1 y = 1 up ( A 1 A_1 ) and from y = 3 y = 3 up ( A 3 A_3 ) can be calculated:

A 0 = 1 2 6 b = 3 b A_0 = \frac{1}{2} \cdot 6b = 3b A 1 = 1 2 5 6 5 b = 25 12 b A_1 = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{5}{6} \cdot 5b = \frac{25}{12}b A 3 = 1 2 1 2 3 b = 3 4 b A_3 = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot 3b = \frac{3}{4}b

The area of the red region is the total area of the triangle ( A 0 A_0 ) minus the area above the red region A 1 A_1 . The area of the blue region is the area above the red region minus the area of the orange region, and the area of the orange region is simply A 3 A_3 . So, the calculations are:

A r e d = A 0 A 1 = 3 b 25 12 b = 36 12 b 25 12 b = 11 12 b A_{red} = A_0 - A_1 = 3b - \frac{25}{12}b = \frac{36}{12}b - \frac{25}{12}b = \frac{11}{12}b A b l u e = A 1 A 3 = 25 12 b 3 4 b = 25 12 b 9 12 b = 16 12 b A_{blue} = A_1 - A_3 = \frac{25}{12}b - \frac{3}{4}b = \frac{25}{12}b - \frac{9}{12}b = \frac{16}{12}b A o r a n g e = A 3 = 3 4 b A_{orange} = A_3 = \frac{3}{4}b

A b l u e A_{blue} is the largest of these.

Virento Voshe
Aug 22, 2018

First, we can divide the triangle into 6 sections in which in each step to the top, it is 1/6th of lesser than before. (as in each level 1/6 is deducted, we assume that the ratio between each level is consistent)

Using the formula to find the area of a trapezoid A=h(a+b/2), we can try to estimate each section of the triangle.

  1. With the first slab being 1(6/6 + 5/6)/2 = 11/12
  2. On to the second slab: 2(5/6 + 3/6)/2 = 4/3 (2 and 2 cancel out, leaving 8/6 which is 4/3 )
  3. Third slab: (3/6 x 3)/2 = 3/4 (Since this is a triangle, not a trapezoid)

We can see that the second section (the blue one) is bigger.

My logic goes a little something like this:

-The horizontal lines only represent the level of each slab out of 6 total level. In other words the height only. (1/6 is 1 out of 6 levels)

-First, there's a total of 6 levels that's proportionally stacked on top. (in other words, the height is 6)

-It is a triangle that is slightly slanted to the right, otherwise, there is no discernible difference. (I'm sure there are some math and explanation to this in which I will not go into because I'm just a rookie)

-I assumed that at each level, the ratio is 1/6 lesser than the level beneath it.

Are each of these lines representing 1/6? so when du look at the whole figure, the last line is 6/6?

and how did u get (5/2 + 4/6)/2? Could you explain in more details?

Ayesha Javed - 2 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

To answer your question:

-The horizontal lines only represent the level of each slab out of 6 total level. In other words the height only. (1/6 is 1 out of 6 levels)

-(5/2 + 4/6)/2; 2 is the height of the trapezium or trapezoid. I miswrote it, I apologize and thanks for pointing that out. It's actually ((5/6 + 3/6)/2)2 which is 4/3.

I don't know how to explain the exact logic behind the geometry but, as you can see in @Jose Fernandez Goycoolea's answer, at the top. The base of the triangle is turned into 6 divisible slabs at proportional lengths on each level of the triangle.

My logic goes a little something like this:

-First, there's a total of 6 levels that's proportionally stacked on top. (in other words, the height is 6)

-It is a triangle that is slightly slanted to the right, otherwise, there is no discernible difference. (there are some math and explanation to this in which I will not go into because I'm just a rookie)

-Which means I can assume that at each level, the ratio is 1/6 lesser than the level beneath it.

I also updated the answer to be more clear.

Virento Voshe - 2 years, 9 months ago
Benjamin Rogers
Aug 21, 2018

Knowing that the centre of gravity of a triangle occurs at a third from the base in the vertical direction, and that a third of the total height in this case is 2, using intuition it's pretty safe to assume that it occurs in the blue region which has a height of two and covers the centre of gravity (where the most mass - in this case area - is distributed).

Umm... what if the values were 19, 2, and 9 (instead of the 3, 2, and 1) ? The center of gravity would fall within the strip that actually only covers 8% of the area. ;-)

C . - 2 years, 9 months ago
Ervyn Manuyag
Aug 20, 2018

It’s because 2x2>1x3.

Anthony Balognius
Aug 26, 2018

I superimposed a portion of the middle segment onto the top segment. You can see that the very top triangle that sticks out will not have enough area to cover the difference of the superimposed portion and the top segment.. For the next comparison the portion of the middle segment that is not covered by the superimposed rectangle is enough to cover not only the difference between the two but also the two tiny traingles that stick out from the bottom.

Svein Tore Sinnes
Aug 24, 2018

Total height of the triangle is 6. If the base is called B, we know (can be proven using trigonometry) that the base of the orange triangle is B 2 \frac{B}{2} and the base of the triangle combined by the blue and the orange area is 5 B 6 \frac{5B}{6} . Thus the red area is 11 B 12 \frac{11B}{12} , the blue area is 16 B 12 \frac{16B}{12} and the orange area is 9 B 12 \frac{9B}{12} .

Jonah Ebent
Aug 21, 2018

I just looked at it

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...