Consider the idealized situation shown in the above figure. If
T
refers to the tension in the string and
f
refers to the frictional force between the box and the floor, select the correct option:
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I envy your handwriting.... :P
Log in to reply
from that, i got to know that your handwriting is not good but handwriting doesn't matter as most of the competitive exams are objective :P
Log in to reply
My handwriting is just...bleh...It's kinda bad,really...I'll soon get a handwriting just as good as yours :P just watch...
Log in to reply
@Yashwanth Manivannan – All the best :) i hope u get it soon ...
I don't quite get why the friction comes first than the tension. The string seems to be tensioned (it is an actual word, right?) and it is also inextensible. My heart says that the string has just as much reason to act than the friction, so what is the deal?
I suggest a slight modification on the figure. If the string wasn't so linear and was, instead, a bit curvy, I would agree that the friction would come first.
Please correct me if I said anything really stupid.
Log in to reply
for curvy there is no problem you got it, now suppose there is no friction than F=40 N is applied then tension will oppose it " as box will be having a ability to move " same is this here to have tension in action box will have to be in tendency to move but friction interrupts and tension does not come into play ... hope you got it .... if not ask clearly the point you are not getting
Log in to reply
Well, I still don't quite get it.
I feel that the last bit of your explanations could be rewritten like this: "(...) to have FRICTION in action, box will have to be in tendency to move but TENSION interrupts and FRICTION does not come into play (...)".
You see, the rewritten sentence makes sense to me, so I couldn't really tell which one is true.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to contest classical mechanics, I just want to understand it.
Log in to reply
@Fernando Tsurukawa – YEAH. I know exactly how you feel man, I was trying to understand the same concept intuitively. It's easy to explain if you consider an extreme case.
Imagine a really really heavy box resting on the ground with a string having a little bit of slack in it at the start. If you pull it, what will happen? Nothing, since friction prevents you from moving it! But if you keep pulling, the box will move until the string becomes taut. Only then does tension begin acting.
Another way to think about it is that friction is the gluey force that holds things down to the ground and prevents them from moving laterally. If you want to move an object, you first have to melt the glue (overcome the friction) and then other forces can act on it.
EDIT: I just read your first comment and realized that I had just explained your curvy string thing. The answer to your question is that there is no difference between a straight string and a curvy string since tension is 0 in both cases initially, though they are drawn differently.
Log in to reply
@Raj Magesh – great explanation same i was trying to explain , and by the way there is difference between curvy string and straight string , just suppose a situation using data of this question where string is taut and external force is 51 N then tension will appear but if with the same force an curvy string is pulled tension will be zero till string is taut and may be full extra force (after friction) is not enough to let the string be taut :) :)
@Fernando Tsurukawa – Friction is a self adjusting force, here when force is more than 50 (maximum value of static friction ) then only tension comes into play
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...