Why are you in a hurry?

An arrangement of smooth pair of long conducting rails which are non resisting are joined to a charged capacitor. The rails are connected by a rod of mass M M , length L L , and Resistance R R . A vertical Magnetic Field B B is established in the region. The rod starts moving due to the influence of the Magnetic Field.

What should be the mass of the rod M M (in mg) so that its Kinetic Energy in steady state is maximum ?

Details and Assumptions:
L = 1 m \bullet L=1m
B = 2 T \bullet B=2T
C = 1 μ F \bullet C=1\mu F
R = 1 \bullet R=1 ohm
\bullet The Rod is initially at rest
\bullet The Magnetic Field is constant and uniform in nature


The answer is 4.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Jatin Yadav
Jan 26, 2014

In this problem , our primary aim is to find the steady state velocity. This can be done by two methods, method one is more important, as it involves more learning.

_ Method-1 : Finding v(t) _

Let us consider the given figure. Clearly the current will start flowing anticlockwise. Hence, lorentz force would act forward. Also, there will be an induced EMF due to the motion of rod. Let, at a time t t , the current is i i , charge at capacitor is q q , and the velocity of rod is v v .

Clearly, i = d q d t i = \frac{-dq}{dt} (as q q is decreasing.).

Also, the lorentz force is i L B iLB , hence, the rate of change of velocity,

d v d t = i L B M = d q d t B L M \frac{dv}{dt} = \frac{iLB}{M} = -\frac{dq}{dt} \frac{BL}{M} , note that i = M B L d v d t i = \frac{M}{BL} \frac{dv}{dt}

Hence, we get : d v = B L M d q dv = -\frac{BL}{M} dq ,

Integrate to get:

v = B L M ( Q q ) q = Q M v B L v = \frac{BL}{M}(Q-q) \Rightarrow q = Q - \frac{Mv}{BL}

Now, we apply kirchoff's voltage law in the circuit, also considering the induced EMF, which clearly equals B v L BvL .

B v L + i R q C = 0 BvL + iR - \frac{q}{C} = 0

B v L + M R B L d v d t ( Q M v B L ) C = 0 \displaystyle \Rightarrow BvL + \frac{MR}{BL} \frac{dv}{dt} - \frac{(Q - \frac{Mv}{BL})}{C} = 0

Rearrange to get:

d v B L Q ( B 2 L 2 C + M ) v = d t M R C \displaystyle \frac{dv}{BLQ - (B^2L^2C +M)v} = \frac{dt}{MRC}

0 v d v B L Q ( B 2 L 2 C + M ) v = 0 t d t M R C \Rightarrow \displaystyle \int_{0}^{v} \frac{dv}{BLQ - (B^2L^2C +M)v} = \int_{0}^{t} \frac{dt}{MRC}

\Rightarrow v ( t ) = B L Q B 2 L 2 C + M ( 1 e B 2 L 2 C + M M R C t ) \boxed{\displaystyle v(t) = \frac{BLQ}{B^2L^2C + M} \bigg(1 - e^{- \frac{B^2L^2C+M}{MRC} t} \bigg)}

Clearly, v v in steady state would be v 0 = B L Q B 2 L 2 C + M v_{0} = \frac{BLQ}{B^2L^2C + M} .

Method-2 : Effortless.

Clearly, in steady state, the velocity becomes constant and hence the net force becomes 0 0 . Thus, i i also becomes 0 0 . Hence, using Kirchoff's voltage law equation, we get:

q = B v 0 L C q = Bv_{0} LC .

But we have already proved that v = B L M ( Q q ) v = \frac{BL}{M} (Q - q)

v 0 = B L M ( Q B v 0 L C ) \Rightarrow v_{0} = \frac{BL}{M} (Q- Bv_{0} LC) .

Solve to get v 0 = B L Q B 2 L 2 C + M \boxed{v_{0} = \frac{BLQ}{B^2L^2C + M}}

Maximising kinetic energy

Clearly, kinetic energy at steady state is K = 1 2 M v 0 2 = B 2 L 2 Q 2 2 M ( B 2 L 2 C + M ) 2 K = \frac{1}{2} Mv_{0}^2 = \frac{B^2L^2Q^2}{2} \frac{M}{(B^2L^2C+M)^2}

To maximise K K , we have to maximise M ( B 2 L 2 C + M ) 2 \frac{M}{(B^2L^2C+M)^2} , as other term is constant.

Rest part involves taking derivative with respect to M M and putting 0 0 , i.e.

M B 2 L 2 C ( M + B 2 L 2 C ) 2 = 0 \frac{M - B^2L^2C}{(M+B^2L^2C)^2} = 0 M = B 2 L 2 C \Rightarrow \boxed{M = B^2L^2C} .

Put values to get M = 4 M = 4 mg

I don't understand the last part, Why I got the derivative respect to M M like this B 2 C L 2 M ( B 2 C L 2 + M ) 3 \frac{B^{2} C L^{2}-M}{(B^{2} C L^{2}+M)^{3}} but the rest is same M = B 2 L 2 C M=B^2L^2C ?

Resha Dwika Hefni Al-Fahsi - 5 years, 1 month ago
Anish Puthuraya
Jan 26, 2014

Let, at a general time t t ,
Current through the rod = i = i

Then,
we know that the Force on the Rod = B i L = BiL

Hence,
B i L = M a BiL = Ma , where a a is the acceleration of the Rod
B L d q d t = M d v d t \Rightarrow BL\frac{dq}{dt} = M\frac{dv}{dt}

B L Q q d q = M 0 v d v \Rightarrow BL\int_Q^q dq = M\int_0^v dv
B L ( q Q ) = M v \Rightarrow BL(q-Q) = Mv

Also,
When the velocity of the Rod is v v , the EMF induced in the rod is B L v BLv
Hence,
q = C V = C ( B L v ) q=CV=C(BLv)

Substituting the value of q q ,
B L ( C B L v Q ) = M v BL(CBLv-Q)=Mv

v = B L Q M + C B 2 L 2 \Rightarrow v=\frac{BLQ}{M+CB^2L^2}

Thus,
Kinetic Energy K = 1 2 M ( B L Q M + C B 2 L 2 ) 2 =\frac{1}{2}M(\frac{BLQ}{M+CB^2L^2})^2

Differentiating with respect to M M ,
d K d M = 0 \frac{dK}{dM} = 0

1 2 M M + C B 2 L 2 = 0 \frac{1}{2}-\frac{M}{M+CB^2L^2}=0

M = 4 × 1 0 6 K g = 4 m g \Rightarrow M=4\times10^{-6}Kg = \boxed{4mg}

i = d q d t i = -\frac{dq}{dt} , not d q d t \frac{dq}{dt} , and hence, B L ( Q q ) = M v BL(Q-q) = Mv

jatin yadav - 7 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

Sorry, I forgot to put in the "-" sign.

Anish Puthuraya - 7 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

But if you were asked to find velocity as a function of time, all that followed would also have been wrong :P

Anyways, cute problem. A variation could also involve finding the heat loss.

jatin yadav - 7 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

@Jatin Yadav Thanks. I think I might post a couple more problems of this type involving capacitors, inductors etc., when I get free time...as I am working on Organic Chemistry notes and problems.

Anish Puthuraya - 7 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

@Anish Puthuraya Wait! All that follows is still wrong :P

jatin yadav - 7 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

@Jatin Yadav Just ignore this solution...i dont know what I did. Yours is a much better solution.

Anish Puthuraya - 7 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

@Anish Puthuraya 240 problems in 2hrs

Anirudha Nayak - 7 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

@Anirudha Nayak in a hurry

Anirudha Nayak - 7 years, 4 months ago

@Anish Puthuraya Do you yourself make these questions

Ronak Agarwal - 6 years, 10 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...