Woodworking

Geometry Level 5

A person finds a piece of wood in a shape of irregular tetrahedron with base edges of length: 5, 6, 7 cm and the remaining three edges of length 8 cm.

Because the surface of the wooden block is damaged, the person decides to take 0.5 cm off each face of the tetrahedron. After doing so, he notices further damage near the vertices of the tetrahedron so he decides to make a sphere shape. What is the radius r r of the largest sphere he can make of the remaining wooden block?

Submit your answer as 10000 r \lfloor 10000r \rfloor .

Try also Woodworks II


The answer is 7968.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Maria Kozlowska
Jan 22, 2016

Insphere is the largest sphere that can fit inside a given tetrahedron. First we are going to calculate radius of the insphere of the original tetrahedron. The formula is given as

r = 3 V S A r=\frac{3V}{SA}

where S A SA is a Surface Area and V = 1 3 ! 1 2 3 d e t ( a i j 2 , 1 1 , 0 ) V=\frac{1}{3!}\sqrt{\frac{1}{2^3} det {a_{ij}^2, 1 \choose 1, 0}}

a i j a_{ij} denotes an edge connecting vertex A i A_{i} and A j A_{j} and

d e t ( a i j 2 , 1 1 , 0 ) = d e t ( 0 a 1 , 2 2 a 1 , 3 2 a 1 , 4 2 1 a 1 , 2 2 0 a 2 , 3 2 a 2 , 4 2 1 a 1 , 3 2 a 2 , 3 2 0 a 3 , 4 2 1 a 1 , 4 2 a 2 , 4 2 a 3 , 4 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 ) det {a_{ij}^2, 1 \choose 1, 0} = det \begin{pmatrix} 0 & a_{1,2}^2 & a_{1,3}^2 & a_{1,4}^2 & 1 \\ a_{1,2}^2 & 0 & a_{2,3}^2 & a_{2,4}^2 & 1 \\ a_{1,3}^2 & a_{2,3}^2 & 0 & a_{3,4}^2 & 1 \\ a_{1,4}^2 & a_{2,4}^2 & a_{3,4}^2 & 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}

Our determinant:

d e t ( 0 8 2 8 2 8 2 1 8 2 0 5 2 6 2 1 8 2 5 2 0 7 2 1 8 2 6 2 7 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 ) = 354168 det \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 8^2 & 8^2 & 8^2 & 1 \\ 8^2 & 0 & 5^2 & 6^2 & 1 \\ 8^2 & 5^2 & 0 & 7^2 & 1 \\ 8^2 & 6^2 & 7^2 & 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix} = 354168

which gives volume of 4919 / 2 \sqrt{4919}/2 .

S A 81.12200460734 SA \approx 81.12200460734

r 1.296853732595 r \approx 1.296853732595

After removing 0.5 0.5 cm off each face the insphere's radius will be:

r 2 = r 0.5 0.796853732595 r_2 = r - 0.5 \approx 0.796853732595 .

The answer is 7968 \boxed{7968} .

Since V V is the volume of the tetrahedron and S A SA is the surface area, shouldn't the formula for the inradius be 3 V S A ? \frac{3V}{SA} \;? This is what you must have used to get the answer. The volume of a tetrahedron is 1 3 × \tfrac13 \,\times base × \,\times\, height, and so the volume of the tetrahedron is the sum of 1 3 r A \tfrac13r A , where A A is the area of each of the faces and r r is the inradius, in other words the volume is 1 3 r S A \tfrac13 r SA .

Mark Hennings - 5 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

Thank you. I corrected the typo in the solution.

Maria Kozlowska - 5 years, 4 months ago
Michael Mendrin
Jan 23, 2016

I kept thinking there was some subtle trickery involved in shaving off that 0.5 cm from the faces.

It would be interesting to do a proper proof for that. I think it would be equivalent to proving that original solid and the shaved one are similar.

Just found something interesting. The inradius formula for any solid is the same. Further read can be found here .

Maria Kozlowska - 5 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

The link you posted is bad. Try again. here

However, it should be pointed out that finding the inradius of a solid depends on all of its faces being tangent to the insphere. That's not always the case. Think of an ordinary shoebox.

Michael Mendrin - 5 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

One time I did not check a link and got a bad one; fixed now. The author uses a term "CIRCUMSOLIDS", which would not apply to a shoebox.

I just did more thorough checking of the result, working face by face, and it looks correct to me.

Maria Kozlowska - 5 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

@Maria Kozlowska Oh, I don't have any doubt that your answer is correct, it's just that you made me think two or three times to make sure I wasn't falling into some kind of a trap.

Michael Mendrin - 5 years, 4 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...