Does there exist a function f : N → N satisfying
6 f ( f ( n ) ) = 5 f ( n ) − n
for all n ∈ N ?
Notation:
N
denotes the
set
of
natural numbers
.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Unique method +1
Log in to reply
This is a standard approach when phrased in terms of linear recurrences. See my solution.
How did you know that g ( n ) ≡ 0 ( m o d 3 m ) ?
I'm still new at modular
Log in to reply
Cause g : N → N so 3 m g ( n ) is an integer from the equation I wrote above.
Log in to reply
If g ( n ) implies to all n , why is g ( n ) = 0 ?
Why not 9, not 27 ?
Log in to reply
@Jason Chrysoprase – 2 7 ≡ 0 ( m o d 8 1 ) . However, m can be any integer.
A more natural approach using the theory of recurrence relations. Identical to Chaebum's, just in a different language.
Suppose that such a function exists.
Fix an integer
n
=
0
.
Define
U
1
=
n
,
U
k
=
f
(
U
k
−
1
(
n
)
)
.
Observe that we have the recurrence relation
6
U
k
=
5
U
k
−
1
−
U
k
−
2
.
Since the characteristic equation is
6
m
2
−
5
m
+
1
=
0
, which has roots
m
=
3
1
,
2
1
, it follows that there are some constants
A
,
B
such that
U
k
=
A
3
k
1
+
B
2
k
1
If A , B are non-zero, there it is clear that there is a K large enough such that U K is not an integer. This contradicts the condition that the function maps the integers to the integers. Hence, we must have A = B = 0 .
In turn, we get a contradiction with k = 1 , since
n = U 1 = 0 3 k 1 + 0 2 k 1 = 0
I learned it Thanks
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Let g ( n ) = 2 f ( n ) − n .
From the question, we have 6 f ( f ( n ) ) = 5 f ( n ) − n ⟹ 3 g ( f ( n ) ) = 6 f ( f ( n ) ) − 3 f ( n ) = 2 f ( n ) − n = g ( n )
Now, since g ( n ) = 3 g ( f ( n ) ) = 9 g ( f ( f ( n ) ) = ⋯ = 3 m g ( m times f ( f ( f … f ( n ) )
Since g : N → N for any given n , m ∈ N , we have that g ( n ) ≡ 0 ( m o d 3 m )
This implies for all n , we have g ( n ) = 0 . Since this implies f ( n ) = 2 n , we have a contradiction as f : N → N .