8 x + 1 3 + 2 x − 3 = 5 Jason came across the above problem in his algebra test and solved it as follows: 8 x + 1 3 + 2 x − 3 ( 8 x + 1 3 + 2 x − 3 ) 2 8 x + 1 3 + 2 x − 3 1 0 x + 1 0 ⇒ x = 5 = 5 2 = 2 5 = 2 5 = 2 3 . We can see that the cancellation of square roots in step 3 is fallacious. So, what's the correct answer (to 2 decimal places)?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
This problem was of course engineered so the "wrong method" and the right method both worked.
There are a few circumstances where both a x + b + c x + d = e and a x + b + c x + d = e 2 will have the same value of x as a solution. This one uses the case where both a and a + c are nonzero and − d = a e 2 c − b c .
I'll leave justifying this as a challenge.
Where does the 25 come from?
Log in to reply
8 x + 1 3 = 4 ( 2 x − 3 ) + 1 2 + 1 3 = 4 u 2 + 2 5
I do not think that you are right in saying that the answer x = 127 / 18 is not an acceptable answer to this question. A square root can be negative as well as positive of course. And if you put x = 127 / 18 into the left hand side of this equation you get [(+/-)25 (+/-) 10] / 3. So there seem to be
Log in to reply
I DID NOT FINISH! 'Plus & Plus' gives an answer of 35 / 3. 'Negative & Negative' gives an answer of -35 / 3. 'PLUS & NEGATIVE' GIVES AN ANSWER OF 5!!!! Which is the one we are wanting!!! And 'Negative & Plus' gives an answer of -5. This is how it seems to me. I put this answer of 127 / 18 - 7.55556 in as the answer. I believed that the questioner would have expected 3/2 but I think that this is a valid answer. I do not think that I have made an error, though I would be interested in any response of course. Regards, David.
Log in to reply
Implicit surds. Yes x^2=c gives x=+-sqrt(c) But the question states positive surds (radicals)
@David Fairer - Square roots are defined to only be positive. There is a difference between x 2 = 2 5 and x = 2 5 . The answer for the first equation is ± 5 , and the answer for the second equation is just 5 . I believe you mixed those two up. I hope this helps you!! (FYI: x 2 = 2 5 is equal to x = ± 2 5 ).
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 |
|
Get complete square by adding square of ½ of the factor of x to both sides
1 2 3 4 5 6 |
|
However, only x = 1.5 satisfies the initial expression (8x +13)^0.50 + ()^0.50 = 5 Any value of x <1.5 will give negative value in the second term under the square route on the left hand-side, which is absurd and cannot be accepted Any value of x >1.5 will give a constant on the right hand-side that is >5 and, i.e. violates the initial expression and cannot be accepted
Log in to reply
I have tried to fix your formatting to some extent.
There is a typo, u 2 = 2 x − 3
Log in to reply
not u 3
Two solutions, x = 1.5, x ≈ 1.72
Log in to reply
@Chad Brittle - If you substitute 1.72 into the equation, I don't think it would work.
What is the reasoning and origin behind the subtraction of 10u in step 3?
I equate directly 8 x + 1 3 = 5 which provide the correct answer x = 2 3 = 1 . 5
Log in to reply
How did you know that √(8x+13) = 5
8 x + 1 3 + 2 x − 3 = 5
or, ( 8 x + 1 3 + 2 x − 3 ) 2 = 5 2
or, 8 x + 1 3 + 2 x − 3 + 2 8 x + 1 3 . 2 x + 3 = 2 5
or, 2 8 x + 1 3 . 2 x − 3 = 1 5 − 1 0 x
or, ( 2 8 x + 1 3 . 2 x − 3 ) 2 = ( 1 5 − 1 0 x ) 2
or, 6 4 x 2 − 9 6 x + 1 0 4 x − 1 5 6 = 2 2 5 − 3 0 0 x + 1 0 0 x 2
or, 6 4 x 2 − 9 6 x + 1 0 4 x + 3 0 0 x − 1 5 6 − 2 2 5 − 1 0 0 x 2 = 0
or, − 3 6 x 2 + 3 0 8 x − 3 8 1 = 0
or, 3 6 x 2 − 3 0 8 x + 3 8 1 = 0 ..........................[multiplying both sides by -1]
now,calculating that, we get that,
x = 1 8 1 2 7 , o r , x = 2 3 = 1 . 5
I used this method, and both answers were given as wrong. 7.05555 >>> 7.06; which may be wrong because of all the squaring. My 1.5 was supposedly wrong because they said it should be 1.50. I do NOT agree with that: if a number is exact I'm sure that you don't add trailing zeros.
Log in to reply
Exactly the same for me. Completely agree with your argument about 1.5 and I still don't see why 7.05555.. when rounded to 2 dec places is not correct.
Log in to reply
the 7.05555... solution is an additional spurious solution which comes from squaring the square roots (twice), and needs to be checked in the original equation, which it doesn't satisfy, so can't be a solution!
Log in to reply
@Dan Wheatley – didn't understand what you said.if i make any mistake could you please correct me?
Log in to reply
@Mohammad Khaza – The $127/18$ solution, although it solves the quadratic you finish with, is NOT a solution to the original equation - try substituting it back in and you'll see! It comes from the fact that you've squared each side to get to a solution, and a common feature of this kind of problem is that you often have to check your final answers in the original equation to be sure. For example, the equation $x - \sqrt{x} = 2$ has only one real solution ($x=4$). However when you rearrange and square both sides, you get $(x-2)^2=x$ which is a quadratic and hence has (potentially) TWO solutions ($x=4$ and $x=1$). One of these, $x=1$, is NOT a solution to the original equation as you can see by substituting 1 into it. Hope this helps!
This method is long but is easier to understand.
1.5 = 1.50 = 1.500 ... @Vivian James So Brilliant is wrong.
Line 6 does not follow from equation on Line 5.
Line 7 does not follow from equation on Line 6
Log in to reply
i did a wrong calculation,now i have corrected that.thank you.is that okay now?
Log in to reply
Line 6 is correct, line 8 is correct, but line 7 is wrong. You're missing a -100x^2.
Log in to reply
@Michael McMullen – oh ho!thank you very much.it was a typing mistake..
Brilliant have obviously fixed this problem (see Vivian James comment) in the last year. I entered 1.5 and it was accepted as correct.
Out of curiosity I began with 7.0555 and this was rejected. I suppose they could argue it is not a valid answer since it is only correct if you take the negative square root of 2x-3.
Since 5 is the sum of two purely square root numbers. If 0 ≤ 8 x + 1 3 ≤ 4 then 2 x − 3 will be imaginary. So, 3 < 8 x + 1 3 < 6 and 0 < 2 x − 3 < 5 as sum is less than 6 .
If 8 x + 1 3 = 4 then x = 8 3 which is not true for 2 x − 3 (becomes imaginary) and left with 8 x + 1 3 = 5 ⇒ x = 8 1 2 = 2 3 which is too true for 2 x − 3 = 0 .
So the answer is 2 3 = 1 . 5
seems easier to note(i) x must be less than or equal to 3/2 or the first term will be greater than 5 and (ii) x must be greater than or equal to 3/2 or the second term will be imaginary. Therefore since x is both greater than or equal to 1.5 and less than or equal to 1.5, it has to equal 1.5. (sorry, my typewriter does not have math notation on it.)
Without digging through all of this, at one point you have 4 = sqrt(8x + 15) = 5. I.e., 4= 5. You seem to be taking a huge shortcut and getting lucky. Your first assertion, that sqrt(8x+13) < 4 implies x<0 is false. 8x+13 < 16 does not imply x < 0.
8 x + 1 3 = 5 − 2 x − 3 ; 8 x + 1 3 = ( 5 − 2 x − 3 ) 2 ; 8 x + 1 3 = 2 5 − 2 x + 3 − 1 0 2 x − 3 ; 1 0 x − 1 5 = − 1 0 2 x − 3 ; 3 − 2 x = 2 2 x − 3 ; ( 3 − 2 x ) 2 = 2 2 ( 2 x − 3 ) ; 4 x 2 − 1 2 x + 9 = 8 x − 1 2 ; 4 x 2 − 2 0 x + 2 1 = 0 ; ( 2 x − 3 ) ( 2 x − 7 ) = 0 ; 2 x = 3 or 2 x = 7 ; x = 2 3 or x = 2 7 .
Check both answers, and we see that only x = 3 / 2 works (after all!)
Why does it work?
In the incorrect, third step, Jason forgot the cross product 2 8 x + 1 3 2 x − 3 . However, if x = 3 / 2 then 2 x − 3 = 0 , so that the cross product is zero. By coincidence, leaving out the term had no effect on the sum!
I've been looking for this precise justification in every solution and you were the first one to mention it! Yes, this is exactly why x = 2 3 is the solution to the equation: it just so happens that 2 x − 3 evaluated at x = 2 3 is 0 , making the squaring of both sides a "valid" step. Thank you, Arjen! On point, as always :)
Log in to reply
Another way to look at it is that Jason's mistake essentially replaces f ( x ) = 8 x + 1 3 + 2 x − 3 with g ( x ) = ( 8 x + 1 3 ) + ( 2 x − 3 ) . These two functions differ for every x value in their domains EXCEPT x = 2 3 . When x = 2 3 , the second term of each function ( 2 x − 3 ) is zero, so f ( x ) and g ( x ) agree.
f ( 2 3 ) = g ( 2 3 ) = 5
if x = 2 3 , then f ( x ) = g ( x )
So Jason will only get the correct solution to 8 x + 1 3 + 2 x − 3 = K if the value of K is chosen to be 5 . Which it was!
Log in to reply
Indeed. This is a special case of a 2 + b 2 = ( a + b ) 2 ⟹ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 .
What a great way to look at it!
Line 3 should actually be 8x+13=25+2x-3-10(2x-3)^(1/2)
Note that LHS is an increasing function while RHS is constant. Thus there will be atmost one real solution.
Take a=2*x - 3
Now we have, sqrt(4a+25)+sqrt(a)=5=sqrt(25)
It is not hard to guess a=0
Or, x=3/2
I arrived at a quadratic with two solutions 1st X = 7.055555 and X = 1.50 ... But I encounter a strange problem the solution X = 7.055554 = 127/18 is not solution of the proposed problem as it should be ... This no he had never encintrado ... I arrive at the Quad: 36X ^ 2 - 308X + 381 = 0 With solutions: X = 127/18 and X = 3/2 li that is true, but only X = 3/2 is proposed exercise solution .... I can not find any errors ... This should have an explanation ... Can you help me.
15-10*(127/18)<0
Jason got lucky. Define S = 2 x − 3 and then note the following.
8 x + 1 3 = 8 x − 1 2 + 2 5 = 4 ( 2 x − 3 ) + 2 5 = 4 S + 2 5
So in terms of S , the equation reads 4 S + 2 5 + S = 5 .
For the left hand side to be real, S ≥ 0 . But that implies 4 S + 2 5 ≥ 0 + 2 5 = 5 .
Therefore 4 S + 2 5 + S ≥ 5 + 0 with equality if and only if S = 0 .
Solving S = 2 x − 3 = 0 , we find that x = 2 3 is the only solution ... just like Jason got in spite of his algebra error.
You could do all the complicated maths, or you could just test the supposedly incorrect answer and find that it proves to be accurate and is therefore the correct answer no matter how you work it out.
(A+B)^2 = A^2 + 2 AB + B^2 = 25
A = (8 x + 13)^0.50
A^2 = (8 x + 13)
B = (2 x - 3)^0.50
B^2 = (2 x - 3)
2 AB = 2 * [(8 x + 13)^0.50 * (2 x - 3)^0.50]
(A+B)^2 = (8 x + 13) + [2 * (8 x + 13)^0.50 * (2 x - 3)^0.50] + (2 x - 3)
25 = 8 x + 13 + [2 * (16 x^2 + 2 x – 39)^0.50 ] + (2 x - 3)
25 = 10 x + 10 + [2 * (16 x^2 + 2 x – 39)^0.50 ]
25 = 10 x + 10 + [4^0.50 * (16 x^2 + 2 x – 39)^0.50 ]
25 = 10 x + 10 + (64 x^2 + 8 x –156)^0.50
15 – 10 x = (64 x^2 + 8 x –156)^0.50
15 – 10 x = (64 x^2 + 8 x –156)^0.50
100 x^2 -300x + 225 = 64 x^2 + 8 x –156
36x^2 -308x +381 = 0
x^2 - (308/36) x = -381/36
Get complete square by adding square of ½ of the factor of x to both sides
x^2 - (308/36) x - (308/72)^2 = -381/36 - (308/72)^2 = -10.583 + 18.299 = 7.716
(x – 308/72)^2 = 7.716
x - 308/72 = +/- (7.716^0.5)
x - 308/72 = +/- 2.777
x - 308/72 = + 2.777 + 308/72 = + 2.777 + 4.277 = 7.055
x = - 2.777 + 308/72 = - 2.777 + 4.277 = 1.500
However, only x = 1.5 satisfies the initial expression (8x +13)^0.50 + ()^0.50 = 5
Any value of x <1.5 will give negative value in the second term under the square route on the left hand-side, which is absurd and cannot be accepted
Any value of x >1.5 will give a constant on the right hand-side that is >5 and, i.e. violates the initial expression and cannot be accepted
Hi Mohamed I am wondering how long it took you to enter this solution? Apart from being very difficult to read you’ve decided to use the ‘complete the square’ method. The discriminant, delta = 40,000 suggesting 2 real unequal rational roots which could be solved by factorisation or the use of the quadratic formula (for the lazy student ;) ) Of course it’s a valid method it’s use is prone to errors. Eg add to both sides not subtraction.
Humm, why does the author of this problem wrote a fallacious reasoning which gives a wrong answer ?
...
Did he dare give us the solution ? Let's try x = 2 3 on the equation...
You did not carefully read the question. The fallacious step of the problem is that ( a + b ) 2 = a 2 + b 2 , which is not generally the case.
Take a look at this equation:
8 x + 1 5 + 2 x + 5 = 1 0
When you square both sides as Jason did above , you get
1 0 x + 2 0 = 1 0 0 ⟹ x = 8
Testing x = 8 , we find that this is the wrong solution to the equation, for the same reason. Read the other solutions to see why Jason "got lucky."
Log in to reply
I totally understood the question actually. I applied my first reasoning to solve the problem, which was to use all the informations provided. One of them is a fallacious reasoning (which appears to be useless, pretty much everybody here knows why it is fallacious), and another is an answer following his reasoning. As the reasoning is (too) obviously wrong, Jason may got lucky, or at least we can try his answer :-)
Let's add new variable k = 8x+13,
In than case our equation will look like this:
k + 1/2* k − 2 5 =5.
K must be equal or more than 25 to prevent us taking square route from negative number.
At the same time k must be less or equal 25, otherwise the sum of 2 square routes will be more than 5.
Only k=25 meets both requirements. That means 8x = 12, x = 1.5
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
In response to Challenge Master's challenge:
Let a = 8 x + 1 3 , b = 2 x − 3 and c = 5 . From the problem, we have { a + b = c a + b = c 2 . . . ( 1 ) . . . ( 2 )
We note that ( 1 ) 2 = ( 2 ) = c 2 , therefore,
( a + b ) 2 a + 2 a b + b ⟹ a b ( 8 x + 1 3 ) ( 2 x − 3 ) ⟹ x = a + b = a + b = 0 = 0 = 2 3 = 1 . 5 If x = − 8 1 3 , 2 x − 3 is unreal.
Previous solution:
8 x + 1 3 + 2 x − 3 4 u 2 + 2 5 + u 2 4 u 2 + 2 5 4 u 2 + 2 5 3 u 2 + 1 0 u u ( 3 u + 1 0 ) = 5 = 5 = 5 − u = 2 5 − 1 0 u + u 2 = 0 = 0 Let u 2 = 2 x − 3
⎩ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎧ u = 0 u = − 3 1 0 ⟹ 2 x − 3 = 0 ⟹ 2 x − 3 = 9 1 0 0 ⟹ x = 2 3 ⟹ x = 1 8 1 2 7
Substituting into the original equation, we find that the only acceptable solution is x = 2 3 = 1 . 5 .