You can't do that!

Algebra Level 1

8 x + 13 + 2 x 3 = 5 \large \sqrt{8x + 13} + \sqrt{2x - 3} = 5 Jason came across the above problem in his algebra test and solved it as follows: 8 x + 13 + 2 x 3 = 5 ( 8 x + 13 + 2 x 3 ) 2 = 5 2 8 x + 13 + 2 x 3 = 25 10 x + 10 = 25 x = 3 2 . \begin{aligned} \sqrt{8x + 13} + \sqrt{2x - 3} & = 5 \\ \big(\sqrt{8x + 13} + \sqrt{2x - 3}\big)^2 & = 5^2 \\ 8x + 13 + 2x - 3 & = 25 \\ 10x + 10 & = 25 \\ \Rightarrow x & = \frac 32. \end{aligned} We can see that the cancellation of square roots in step 3 is fallacious. So, what's the correct answer (to 2 decimal places)?


The answer is 1.50.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

11 solutions

Chew-Seong Cheong
Sep 22, 2017

In response to Challenge Master's challenge:

Let a = 8 x + 13 a = 8x+13 , b = 2 x 3 b=2x-3 and c = 5 c=5 . From the problem, we have { a + b = c . . . ( 1 ) a + b = c 2 . . . ( 2 ) \begin{cases} \sqrt a + \sqrt b = c &...(1) \\ a + b = c^2 & ...(2) \end{cases}

We note that ( 1 ) 2 = ( 2 ) = c 2 (1)^2 = (2) = c^2 , therefore,

( a + b ) 2 = a + b a + 2 a b + b = a + b a b = 0 ( 8 x + 13 ) ( 2 x 3 ) = 0 x = 3 2 = 1.5 If x = 13 8 , 2 x 3 is unreal. \begin{aligned} (\sqrt a + \sqrt b)^2 & = a+b \\ a + 2\sqrt{ab} + b & = a+b \\ \implies ab & = 0 \\ (8x+13)(2x-3) & = 0 \\ \implies x & = \frac 32 = \boxed{1.5} & \small \color{#3D99F6} \text{If } x = - \frac {13}8, \sqrt{2x-3} \text{ is unreal.} \end{aligned}


Previous solution:

8 x + 13 + 2 x 3 = 5 Let u 2 = 2 x 3 4 u 2 + 25 + u 2 = 5 4 u 2 + 25 = 5 u 4 u 2 + 25 = 25 10 u + u 2 3 u 2 + 10 u = 0 u ( 3 u + 10 ) = 0 \begin{aligned} \sqrt{8x+13}+\sqrt{2x-3} &=5 & \small \color{#3D99F6} \text{Let }u^2=2x-3 \\ \sqrt{4u^2+25} + \sqrt{u^2}&=5 \\ \sqrt{4u^2+25} &=5-u \\ 4u^2+25 &= 25-10u +u^2 \\ 3u^2+10u &= 0 \\ u(3u +10) &= 0 \end{aligned}

{ u = 0 2 x 3 = 0 x = 3 2 u = 10 3 2 x 3 = 100 9 x = 127 18 \begin{cases} u=0 & \implies 2x-3=0 & \implies x = \dfrac 32 \\ u=-\dfrac {10}3 & \implies 2x-3= \dfrac {100}9 & \implies x = \dfrac {127}{18} \end{cases}

Substituting into the original equation, we find that the only acceptable solution is x = 3 2 = 1.5 x =\dfrac 32 =\boxed{1.5} .

Moderator note:

This problem was of course engineered so the "wrong method" and the right method both worked.

There are a few circumstances where both a x + b + c x + d = e \sqrt{ax + b} + \sqrt{cx + d} = e and a x + b + c x + d = e 2 ax + b + cx + d = e^2 will have the same value of x x as a solution. This one uses the case where both a a and a + c a+c are nonzero and d = e 2 c b c a . -d = \frac{e^2c - bc}{a} .

I'll leave justifying this as a challenge.

Where does the 25 come from?

Yaseen Ahammed - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

8 x + 13 = 4 ( 2 x 3 ) + 12 + 13 = 4 u 2 + 25 8x+13=4(2x-3)+12+13 = 4u^2 + 25

Chew-Seong Cheong - 3 years, 8 months ago

I do not think that you are right in saying that the answer x = 127 / 18 is not an acceptable answer to this question. A square root can be negative as well as positive of course. And if you put x = 127 / 18 into the left hand side of this equation you get [(+/-)25 (+/-) 10] / 3. So there seem to be

David Fairer - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

I DID NOT FINISH! 'Plus & Plus' gives an answer of 35 / 3. 'Negative & Negative' gives an answer of -35 / 3. 'PLUS & NEGATIVE' GIVES AN ANSWER OF 5!!!! Which is the one we are wanting!!! And 'Negative & Plus' gives an answer of -5. This is how it seems to me. I put this answer of 127 / 18 - 7.55556 in as the answer. I believed that the questioner would have expected 3/2 but I think that this is a valid answer. I do not think that I have made an error, though I would be interested in any response of course. Regards, David.

David Fairer - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Implicit surds. Yes x^2=c gives x=+-sqrt(c) But the question states positive surds (radicals)

Chaz Dodd - 3 years, 8 months ago

@David Fairer - Square roots are defined to only be positive. There is a difference between x 2 = 25 x^2=25 and x = 25 x=\sqrt{25} . The answer for the first equation is ± 5 ±5 , and the answer for the second equation is just 5 5 . I believe you mixed those two up. I hope this helps you!! (FYI: x 2 = 25 x^2=25 is equal to x = ± 25 x=±\sqrt{25} ).

Terry Yu - 3 years, 7 months ago

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
(A+B)^2 = A^2 + 2 AB + B^2 = 25
A = (8 x + 13)^0.50
A^2 = (8 x + 13)
B = (2 x - 3)^0.50
B^2 = (2 x - 3)
2 AB = 2 * [(8 x + 13)^0.50 * (2 x - 3)^0.50]
(A+B)^2 = (8 x + 13) +   [2 * (8 x + 13)^0.50 * (2 x - 3)^0.50]            + (2 x - 3)
       25   = 8 x + 13    +      [2 * (16 x^2 + 2 x – 39)^0.50 ]               + (2 x - 3)
       25   = 10 x + 10    +      [2 * (16 x^2 + 2 x – 39)^0.50 ]            
       25   = 10 x + 10    +      [4^0.50 * (16 x^2 + 2 x – 39)^0.50 ]            
       25   = 10 x + 10    +      (64 x^2 + 8 x –156)^0.50             
       15 – 10 x =      (64 x^2 + 8 x –156)^0.50             
       15 – 10 x =      (64 x^2 + 8 x –156)^0.50             
100 x^2 -300x + 225 = 64 x^2 + 8 x –156
36x^2 -308x +381 = 0
x^2 - (308/36) x = -381/36

Get complete square by adding square of ½ of the factor of x to both sides

1
2
3
4
5
6
x^2 - (308/36) x - (308/72)^2 = -381/36 - (308/72)^2 = -10.583 + 18.299 = 7.716
(x – 308/72)^2                          = 7.716 
x - 308/72                          = +/- (7.716^0.5)
x - 308/72                          = +/- 2.777
x - 308/72                          = + 2.777 + 308/72 = + 2.777 + 4.277 = 7.055
x                                           = - 2.777 + 308/72 = - 2.777 + 4.277 = 1.500

However, only x = 1.5 satisfies the initial expression (8x +13)^0.50 + ()^0.50 = 5 Any value of x <1.5 will give negative value in the second term under the square route on the left hand-side, which is absurd and cannot be accepted Any value of x >1.5 will give a constant on the right hand-side that is >5 and, i.e. violates the initial expression and cannot be accepted

Mohamed Fahmy Hussein - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

I have tried to fix your formatting to some extent.

Agnishom Chattopadhyay - 3 years, 8 months ago

There is a typo, u 2 = 2 x 3 u^2=2x-3

genis dude - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

not u 3 u^3

genis dude - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks, I was typing on a phone.

Chew-Seong Cheong - 3 years, 8 months ago

Two solutions, x = 1.5, x ≈ 1.72

Chad Brittle - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Chad Brittle - If you substitute 1.72 into the equation, I don't think it would work.

Terry Yu - 3 years, 8 months ago

What is the reasoning and origin behind the subtraction of 10u in step 3?

A Former Brilliant Member - 3 years, 7 months ago

I equate directly 8 x + 13 = 5 \sqrt{8x+13}=5 which provide the correct answer x = 3 2 = 1.5 x=\frac{3}{2}=1.5

Naren Bhandari - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

How did you know that √(8x+13) = 5

Santanu Patra - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Santanu Patra you can see my solution. :)

Naren Bhandari - 3 years, 8 months ago
Mohammad Khaza
Oct 1, 2017

8 x + 13 + 2 x 3 = 5 \sqrt{8x+13}+\sqrt{2x-3}=5

or, ( 8 x + 13 + 2 x 3 ) 2 = 5 2 (\sqrt{8x+13}+\sqrt{2x-3} )^2=5^2

or, 8 x + 13 + 2 x 3 + 2 8 x + 13 . 2 x + 3 = 25 8x+13+2x-3+2\sqrt{8x+13}.\sqrt{2x+3}=25

or, 2 8 x + 13 . 2 x 3 = 15 10 x 2\sqrt{8x+13}.\sqrt{2x-3}=15-10x

or, ( 2 8 x + 13 . 2 x 3 ) 2 = ( 15 10 x ) 2 (2 \sqrt{8x+13}.\sqrt{2x-3})^{2}=(15-10x)^2

or, 64 x 2 96 x + 104 x 156 = 225 300 x + 100 x 2 64x^2-96x+104x-156=225-300x+100x^2

or, 64 x 2 96 x + 104 x + 300 x 156 225 100 x 2 = 0 64x^2-96x+104x+300x-156-225-100x^2=0

or, 36 x 2 + 308 x 381 = 0 -36x^2+308x-381=0

or, 36 x 2 308 x + 381 = 0 36x^2-308x+381=0 ..........................[multiplying both sides by -1]

now,calculating that, we get that, \text{now,calculating that, we get that,}

x = 127 18 , o r , x = 3 2 = 1.5 x=\frac{127}{18}, or, x=\frac{3}{2}=1.5

I used this method, and both answers were given as wrong. 7.05555 >>> 7.06; which may be wrong because of all the squaring. My 1.5 was supposedly wrong because they said it should be 1.50. I do NOT agree with that: if a number is exact I'm sure that you don't add trailing zeros.

Vivian James - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Exactly the same for me. Completely agree with your argument about 1.5 and I still don't see why 7.05555.. when rounded to 2 dec places is not correct.

Ben Bazzard - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

the 7.05555... solution is an additional spurious solution which comes from squaring the square roots (twice), and needs to be checked in the original equation, which it doesn't satisfy, so can't be a solution!

Dan Wheatley - 3 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

@Dan Wheatley didn't understand what you said.if i make any mistake could you please correct me?

Mohammad Khaza - 3 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

@Mohammad Khaza The $127/18$ solution, although it solves the quadratic you finish with, is NOT a solution to the original equation - try substituting it back in and you'll see! It comes from the fact that you've squared each side to get to a solution, and a common feature of this kind of problem is that you often have to check your final answers in the original equation to be sure. For example, the equation $x - \sqrt{x} = 2$ has only one real solution ($x=4$). However when you rearrange and square both sides, you get $(x-2)^2=x$ which is a quadratic and hence has (potentially) TWO solutions ($x=4$ and $x=1$). One of these, $x=1$, is NOT a solution to the original equation as you can see by substituting 1 into it. Hope this helps!

Dan Wheatley - 3 years, 4 months ago

This method is long but is easier to understand.

The S.G.D.T - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

thank you very much.

Mohammad Khaza - 3 years, 8 months ago

1.5 = 1.50 = 1.500 ... @Vivian James So Brilliant is wrong.

KMD - 3 years, 8 months ago

Line 6 does not follow from equation on Line 5.
Line 7 does not follow from equation on Line 6

Brenda Kock - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

i did a wrong calculation,now i have corrected that.thank you.is that okay now?

Mohammad Khaza - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Line 6 is correct, line 8 is correct, but line 7 is wrong. You're missing a -100x^2.

Michael McMullen - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Michael McMullen oh ho!thank you very much.it was a typing mistake..

Mohammad Khaza - 3 years, 8 months ago

Brilliant have obviously fixed this problem (see Vivian James comment) in the last year. I entered 1.5 and it was accepted as correct.

Out of curiosity I began with 7.0555 and this was rejected. I suppose they could argue it is not a valid answer since it is only correct if you take the negative square root of 2x-3.

Paul Cockburn - 2 years, 8 months ago
Naren Bhandari
Sep 24, 2017

Since 5 5 is the sum of two purely square root numbers. If 0 8 x + 13 4 0≤ \sqrt{8x+13}≤4 then 2 x 3 \sqrt{2x-3} will be imaginary. So, 3 < 8 x + 13 < 6 3<\sqrt{8x+13}<6 and 0 < 2 x 3 < 5 0<\sqrt{2x-3}<5 as sum is less than 6 6 .

If 8 x + 13 = 4 \sqrt{8x+13}=4 then x = 3 8 x= \frac{3}{8} which is not true for 2 x 3 \sqrt{2x-3} (becomes imaginary) and left with 8 x + 13 = 5 x = 12 8 = 3 2 \sqrt{8x+13}=5 \Rightarrow x = \frac{12}{8} = \frac{3}{2} which is too true for 2 x 3 = 0 \sqrt{2x-3} =0 .

So the answer is 3 2 = 1.5 \dfrac{3}{2} = \boxed{1.5}

seems easier to note(i) x must be less than or equal to 3/2 or the first term will be greater than 5 and (ii) x must be greater than or equal to 3/2 or the second term will be imaginary. Therefore since x is both greater than or equal to 1.5 and less than or equal to 1.5, it has to equal 1.5. (sorry, my typewriter does not have math notation on it.)

Howard Newman - 3 years, 8 months ago

Without digging through all of this, at one point you have 4 = sqrt(8x + 15) = 5. I.e., 4= 5. You seem to be taking a huge shortcut and getting lucky. Your first assertion, that sqrt(8x+13) < 4 implies x<0 is false. 8x+13 < 16 does not imply x < 0.

Richard Desper - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

I have edited the solution. Thank you! :)

Naren Bhandari - 3 years, 8 months ago

8 x + 13 = 5 2 x 3 ; 8 x + 13 = ( 5 2 x 3 ) 2 ; 8 x + 13 = 25 2 x + 3 10 2 x 3 ; 10 x 15 = 10 2 x 3 ; 3 2 x = 2 2 x 3 ; ( 3 2 x ) 2 = 2 2 ( 2 x 3 ) ; 4 x 2 12 x + 9 = 8 x 12 ; 4 x 2 20 x + 21 = 0 ; ( 2 x 3 ) ( 2 x 7 ) = 0 ; 2 x = 3 or 2 x = 7 ; x = 3 2 or x = 7 2 . \sqrt{8x + 13} = 5 - \sqrt{2x - 3}; \\ 8x + 13 = (5 - \sqrt{2x -3})^2; \\ 8x + 13 = 25 - 2x + 3 - 10\sqrt{2x-3}; \\ 10 x - 15 = -10\sqrt{2x-3}; \\ 3 - 2x = 2\sqrt{2x-3}; \\ (3 - 2x)^2 = 2^2(2x - 3); \\ 4x^2 - 12 x + 9 = 8x - 12; \\ 4x^2 - 20 x + 21 = 0; \\ (2x - 3)(2x - 7) = 0; \\ 2x = 3\ \ \text{or}\ \ 2x = 7; \\ x = \frac 3 2 \ \ \text{or}\ \ x = \frac 7 2.

Check both answers, and we see that only x = 3 / 2 x = 3/2 works (after all!)


Why does it work?

In the incorrect, third step, Jason forgot the cross product 2 8 x + 13 2 x 3 2\sqrt{8x+13}\sqrt {2x - 3} . However, if x = 3 / 2 x = 3/2 then 2 x 3 = 0 2x - 3 = 0 , so that the cross product is zero. By coincidence, leaving out the term had no effect on the sum!

I've been looking for this precise justification in every solution and you were the first one to mention it! Yes, this is exactly why x = 3 2 x = \dfrac 32 is the solution to the equation: it just so happens that 2 x 3 \sqrt{2x - 3} evaluated at x = 3 2 x = \dfrac 32 is 0 0 , making the squaring of both sides a "valid" step. Thank you, Arjen! On point, as always :)

Zach Abueg - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Another way to look at it is that Jason's mistake essentially replaces f ( x ) = 8 x + 13 + 2 x 3 f(x) = \sqrt{8x + 13} + \sqrt{2x - 3} with g ( x ) = ( 8 x + 13 ) + ( 2 x 3 ) g(x) = \sqrt{(8x+13) + (2x-3)} . These two functions differ for every x x value in their domains EXCEPT x = 3 2 x = \frac{3}{2} . When x = 3 2 x = \frac{3}{2} , the second term of each function ( 2 x 3 2x-3 ) is zero, so f ( x ) f(x) and g ( x ) g(x) agree.

f ( 3 2 ) = g ( 3 2 ) = 5 f(\frac{3}{2}) = g(\frac{3}{2}) = 5

if x 3 2 x \neq \frac{3}{2} , then f ( x ) g ( x ) f(x) \neq g(x)

So Jason will only get the correct solution to 8 x + 13 + 2 x 3 = K \sqrt{8x + 13} + \sqrt{2x - 3} = K if the value of K K is chosen to be 5 5 . Which it was!

Matthew Feig - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Indeed. This is a special case of a 2 + b 2 = ( a + b ) 2 a = 0 b = 0. a^2 + b^2 = (a + b)^2\ \ \ \implies\ \ \ a = 0\ \vee\ b = 0.

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 3 years, 8 months ago

What a great way to look at it!

Zach Abueg - 3 years, 8 months ago

Line 3 should actually be 8x+13=25+2x-3-10(2x-3)^(1/2)

John Daniel - 3 years, 8 months ago
Geeta .
Oct 5, 2017

Note that LHS is an increasing function while RHS is constant. Thus there will be atmost one real solution.

Take a=2*x - 3

Now we have, sqrt(4a+25)+sqrt(a)=5=sqrt(25)

It is not hard to guess a=0

Or, x=3/2

Jaime Maldonado
Oct 4, 2017

I arrived at a quadratic with two solutions 1st X = 7.055555 and X = 1.50 ... But I encounter a strange problem the solution X = 7.055554 = 127/18 is not solution of the proposed problem as it should be ... This no he had never encintrado ... I arrive at the Quad: 36X ^ 2 - 308X + 381 = 0 With solutions: X = 127/18 and X = 3/2 li that is true, but only X = 3/2 is proposed exercise solution .... I can not find any errors ... This should have an explanation ... Can you help me.

15-10*(127/18)<0

欣玮 程 - 3 years, 8 months ago
Matthew Feig
Oct 2, 2017

Jason got lucky. Define S = 2 x 3 S= 2x-3 and then note the following.

8 x + 13 = 8 x 12 + 25 = 4 ( 2 x 3 ) + 25 = 4 S + 25 \begin{aligned} 8x + 13 & = 8x -12 + 25 \\ & = 4(2x-3) + 25 \\ & = 4S + 25 \end{aligned}

So in terms of S S , the equation reads 4 S + 25 + S = 5 \sqrt{4S + 25} + \sqrt{S} = 5 .

For the left hand side to be real, S 0 S \geq 0 . But that implies 4 S + 25 0 + 25 = 5 \sqrt{4S + 25} \geq \sqrt{0 + 25} = 5 .

Therefore 4 S + 25 + S 5 + 0 \sqrt{4S + 25} + \sqrt{S} \geq 5 + 0 with equality if and only if S = 0 S = 0 .

Solving S = 2 x 3 = 0 S = 2x-3 = 0 , we find that x = 3 2 x = \frac{3}{2} is the only solution ... just like Jason got in spite of his algebra error.

Gavin Glaum
Oct 8, 2017

You could do all the complicated maths, or you could just test the supposedly incorrect answer and find that it proves to be accurate and is therefore the correct answer no matter how you work it out.

(A+B)^2 = A^2 + 2 AB + B^2 = 25 A = (8 x + 13)^0.50 A^2 = (8 x + 13) B = (2 x - 3)^0.50 B^2 = (2 x - 3) 2 AB = 2 * [(8 x + 13)^0.50 * (2 x - 3)^0.50] (A+B)^2 = (8 x + 13) + [2 * (8 x + 13)^0.50 * (2 x - 3)^0.50] + (2 x - 3) 25 = 8 x + 13 + [2 * (16 x^2 + 2 x – 39)^0.50 ] + (2 x - 3) 25 = 10 x + 10 + [2 * (16 x^2 + 2 x – 39)^0.50 ]
25 = 10 x + 10 + [4^0.50 * (16 x^2 + 2 x – 39)^0.50 ]
25 = 10 x + 10 + (64 x^2 + 8 x –156)^0.50
15 – 10 x = (64 x^2 + 8 x –156)^0.50
15 – 10 x = (64 x^2 + 8 x –156)^0.50
100 x^2 -300x + 225 = 64 x^2 + 8 x –156 36x^2 -308x +381 = 0 x^2 - (308/36) x = -381/36 Get complete square by adding square of ½ of the factor of x to both sides x^2 - (308/36) x - (308/72)^2 = -381/36 - (308/72)^2 = -10.583 + 18.299 = 7.716 (x – 308/72)^2 = 7.716 x - 308/72 = +/- (7.716^0.5) x - 308/72 = +/- 2.777 x - 308/72 = + 2.777 + 308/72 = + 2.777 + 4.277 = 7.055 x = - 2.777 + 308/72 = - 2.777 + 4.277 = 1.500 However, only x = 1.5 satisfies the initial expression (8x +13)^0.50 + ()^0.50 = 5 Any value of x <1.5 will give negative value in the second term under the square route on the left hand-side, which is absurd and cannot be accepted Any value of x >1.5 will give a constant on the right hand-side that is >5 and, i.e. violates the initial expression and cannot be accepted




Hi Mohamed I am wondering how long it took you to enter this solution? Apart from being very difficult to read you’ve decided to use the ‘complete the square’ method. The discriminant, delta = 40,000 suggesting 2 real unequal rational roots which could be solved by factorisation or the use of the quadratic formula (for the lazy student ;) ) Of course it’s a valid method it’s use is prone to errors. Eg add to both sides not subtraction.

Chaz Dodd - 3 years, 8 months ago

Humm, why does the author of this problem wrote a fallacious reasoning which gives a wrong answer ?

...

Did he dare give us the solution ? Let's try x = 3 2 x = \frac 3 2 on the equation...

You did not carefully read the question. The fallacious step of the problem is that ( a + b ) 2 = a 2 + b 2 \left(a + b\right)^2 = a^2 + b^2 , which is not generally the case.

Take a look at this equation:

8 x + 15 + 2 x + 5 = 10 \sqrt{8x + 15} + \sqrt{2x + 5} = 10

When you square both sides as Jason did above , you get

10 x + 20 = 100 x = 8 10x + 20 = 100 \implies x = 8

Testing x = 8 x = 8 , we find that this is the wrong solution to the equation, for the same reason. Read the other solutions to see why Jason "got lucky."

Zach Abueg - 3 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

I totally understood the question actually. I applied my first reasoning to solve the problem, which was to use all the informations provided. One of them is a fallacious reasoning (which appears to be useless, pretty much everybody here knows why it is fallacious), and another is an answer following his reasoning. As the reasoning is (too) obviously wrong, Jason may got lucky, or at least we can try his answer :-)

Steven De Oliveira - 3 years, 8 months ago
Dennis K
Oct 3, 2017

Let's add new variable k = 8x+13,

In than case our equation will look like this:

k \sqrt{k} + 1/2* k 25 \sqrt{k-25} =5.

K must be equal or more than 25 to prevent us taking square route from negative number.

At the same time k must be less or equal 25, otherwise the sum of 2 square routes will be more than 5.

Only k=25 meets both requirements. That means 8x = 12, x = 1.5

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...