Second Term Is All You Need

Algebra Level 3

Let S S denote the sum of an infinite geometric sequence , with S > 0 S>0 . If the second term of this sequence is 1, what is the smallest possible value of S S ?


Try Part I .


The answer is 4.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Chew-Seong Cheong
Jul 27, 2016

The sum of infinite geometric progression with first term a a and common ratio r r is given by:

S = a 1 r Multiply up and down of RHS by r . = a r r ( 1 r ) Note that the second term is a r = 1 = 1 r ( 1 r ) = 1 r + 1 1 r By AM-HM inequality (see Note) 4 r + 1 r 4 \begin{aligned} S & = \frac a{1-r} & \small \color{#3D99F6}{\text{Multiply up and down of RHS by }r.} \\ & = \frac {ar}{r(1-r)} & \small \color{#3D99F6}{\text{Note that the second term is }ar=1} \\ & = \frac {\color{#3D99F6}{1}}{r(1-r)} \\ & = \color{#3D99F6}{\frac 1r + \frac 1{1-r}} & \small \color{#3D99F6}{\text{By AM-HM inequality (see Note)}} \\ & \ge \frac 4{r+1-r} \\ & \ge \boxed{4} \end{aligned}


Note: \color{#3D99F6}{\text{Note:}}

We note that for S > 0 S>0 , a > 0 \implies a >0 and r > 0 r > 0 and for the infinite GP to converge r < 1 r < 1 . Therefore, 1 r , 1 1 r > 0 \dfrac 1r, \dfrac 1{1-r} > 0 and AM-HM inequality applies.

Why must r be greater than 0?

Nick Schreiner - 4 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

No, (\frac 1r) and 1 1 r \frac 1{1-r} must be > 0 > 0 so that AM-GM inequality applies.

Chew-Seong Cheong - 4 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

You stated that 0<r<1, and while r<1 is clear from convergence, you need to use S>0 to show that r>0. I feel that your solution would be stronger with that detail added.

Nick Schreiner - 4 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

@Nick Schreiner Thanks, I have reworded the solution. I was trying to make it as short as possible.

Chew-Seong Cheong - 4 years, 10 months ago

Same solution. Just want to say that AM-HM seems easier.

Manuel Kahayon - 4 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks. You are right. I seldom use AM-HM. I have changed the solution.

Chew-Seong Cheong - 4 years, 10 months ago

amazing approach .

Ujjwal Mani Tripathi - 4 years, 10 months ago
Aaron Tsai
Jul 25, 2016

Relevant wiki: Geometric Progression Problem Solving

The sum S S of an infinite geometric series is S = a 1 1 r S=\dfrac{a_1}{1-r} , where a 1 a_1 is the first term and r r is the common ratio between consecutive terms.

Since it is a geometric series, a term multiplied by the common ratio yields the consecutive term. So, a 1 r = a 2 a_1\cdot r=a_2 . It is given that a 2 = 1 a_2=1 ; thus a 1 = 1 r a_1=\dfrac{1}{r} .

Substituting that into the infinite geometric series sum formula, we have

S = 1 r 1 r = 1 r 2 + r S=\dfrac{\dfrac{1}{r}}{1-r}=\dfrac{1}{-r^2+r}

We are asked to minimize S S . So, in order to minimize 1 r 2 + r \dfrac{1}{-r^2+r} we must maximize the denominator. The denominator, r 2 + r -r^2+r , is a quadratic expression in the form A x 2 + B x + C Ax^2+Bx+C , so its maximum/minimum (in this case maximum since A < 0 A<0 ) occurs when r = B 2 A = 0.5 r=-\dfrac{B}{2A}=0.5 .

Plugging r = 0.5 r=0.5 back in the equation for S S , we get S = 1 0. 5 2 + 0.5 = 4 S=\dfrac{1}{-0.5^2+0.5}=4 . Therefore, the smallest possible value of S S is 4 \boxed{4} .

you can derivate the expression to get answer

A Former Brilliant Member - 4 years, 10 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...