⎩ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎧ lo g 2 x + lo g 4 y + lo g 4 z = 2 lo g 3 y + lo g 9 z + lo g 9 x = 2 lo g 4 z + lo g 1 6 x + lo g 1 6 y = 2
3 x + 8 y + 3 z = ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I upvoted this solution just because of that pic you posted at the end. :D I was having the exact same feels when I solved this problem, the only difference being that I was using a rocket launcher. :P By the way, this problem is overrated. It should've been a level 3 problem.
A funny fact is that the photo of the prob contained 132 which is double of 61 . Haha ....
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Oh my .... this days multiplying variables has brought me failure to multiplying constants .
and @John Muradeli 61.2=122 ... you wrote the answer again in the pic !!my whole life is a lie! O_O
Log in to reply
@Soumo Mukherjee – Um... lol... WHAT??
I never even intended for "Fact 132" to be close to the answer in some way. Where are you guys pulling these things out from? :O
Log in to reply
@John M. – Ok ..Ok.. :D But 2 times your pic contained the answer :D ...
c'mon man just having a bit fun...
Photo! OMG you were counting them! @_@
Log in to reply
I dont know what you meant , I solved and while submitting a wrong simple multiplication crossed my mind !
pretty good observation bro
I got lost. I got terms like x 2 y z instead of x y z . After that God knows what I did and couldn't solve 3 equation of 3 variable (Shame!).
Smart solution by the way.
Log in to reply
You were going right. If you'd square root both sides you'd get x y z . But this wasn't needed since you could directly solved it.
Log in to reply
Yes, instead I would be getting ( x y z ) 4 ...But i started dividing and all... and went far...very far from the solution.
Hey Math Philic!
Hm that's interesting. I wonder how you got that. Well, you could've rooted all of them and gotten where I got, I guess. In the end I do square all of them, but the fact that I had them all in rooted form first helped me obtain the expression for ( x y z ) 2 .
Stay cool, Math Philic b(o.o)d
Log in to reply
Yeah! John is back ^_^. Behold and travel through my stupidity.You are going to be very annoyed by knowing what kinda stupidity I was doing in solution.
First thought:Since the expression which need to be evaluated is a linear f ( x , y , z ) [without any log], So, get rid of log.
I proceeded as :
2 lo g 2 x + lo g 2 y + lo g 2 z = 4 lo g 3 x + 2 lo g 3 y + lo g 3 z = 4 lo g 4 x + lo g 4 y + 2 lo g 4 z = 4 lo g 2 y z x 2 = 4 lo g 3 x z y 2 = 4 lo g 4 y x z 2 = 4 y z x 2 = 2 4 . . . . ( a ) x z y 2 = 3 4 . . . . ( b ) y x z 2 = 4 4 . . . . ( c )
Then finally got 3 equation in 3 variable.
Second thought:Solve them. Solved ? No, not now.
Then, [only God knows], what chemical reaction went inside my head that I started dividing (a) with (b) then (b) with (c) .... .Then I got equations in terms of x/y, y/z, x/z .Couldn't hold my excitement went for them and kept wandering till I clicked 'Reveal Solution'.And couldn't shoot the zombies :'(.
Yours is a simpler one.Your all solutions are simple no doubt about that.
Log in to reply
@Soumo Mukherjee – well.. Math Philic.. multyply eq. a,b and c then you simply get xyz=2.3.4=24 and then dividing you will get required solution.
I've also done the problem in the same way.
log 2x+log 4y+log 4z = 2 log 2x+log 4y+log 4z = (log x/ log 2) + (log y/ log4) + (log z/log4) = (log x/ log 2) + (log y/ 2log2) + (log z/2log2) = (1/2log2)(logx^2 + log y + log z) .
(1/2log2)(logx^2 + log y + log z) = 2.
logx^2yz = log 16.
x^2yz= 16 - (1)...
Similarly xy^2z=81 - (2)... xyz^2=256 - (3)... multiplying (1), (2), (3) 〖(xyz)〗^4= 〖(2 4 3)〗^4. xyz = 24. eqn(1) becomes x(xyz) = 16. eqn (2) Becomes y(xyz) = 81. eqn(3) Becomes z(xyz) = 256. Substitute xyz in above equations x = 16/24 = 2/3. y = 81/24 = 27/8. z = 256/24 = 32/3. therefore, 3x+8y+3z = 3(2/3)+8(27/8)+3(32/3) = 3 + 27 + 32 = 61.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Using the formula
lo g a N = lo g b a lo g b N ,
we can rewrite our system of equation in a following way:
⎩ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎧ lo g 2 x + 2 1 lo g 2 y + 2 1 lo g 2 z = 2 lo g 3 y + 2 1 lo g 3 z + 2 1 lo g 3 x = 2 lo g 4 z + 2 1 lo g 4 x + 2 1 lo g 4 y = 2
Simplifying 1 , we obtain
⎩ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎧ x y z = 4 y z x = 9 z x y = 1 6 ( a )
Multiplying all of the equations out, we get
( x y z ) 2 = 4 ⋅ 9 ⋅ 1 6
from which
x y z = 2 4 . ( b )
(from the given problem we take the principal root of the equation in order to make sense for the original x , y , and z arguments of the logs).
Squaring each equation in system ( a ) and dividing them by ( b ) , we obtain
x = 3 2 , y = 8 2 7 , z = 3 3 2 .
1 - simplification took place in a following way:
⎩ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎧ lo g 2 x + 2 1 lo g 2 y + 2 1 lo g 2 z = 2 lo g 3 y + 2 1 lo g 3 z + 2 1 lo g 3 x = 2 lo g 4 z + 2 1 lo g 4 x + 2 1 lo g 4 y = 2 ⇒ ⎩ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎧ lo g 2 x y z = 2 lo g 3 y z x = 2 lo g 4 z x y = 2 ⇒ ⎩ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎧ 2 lo g 2 x y z = 2 2 3 lo g 3 y z x = 3 2 4 lo g 4 z x y = 4 2
s